• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在医院环境中实施脓毒症捆绑治疗以降低严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的死亡率。

Decreasing mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock patients by implementing a sepsis bundle in a hospital setting.

机构信息

Critical Care Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e26790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026790. Epub 2011 Nov 3.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0026790
PMID:22073193
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3207817/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines for the management of severe sepsis (SS) and septic shock (SSh) have been recommended to reduce morbidity and mortality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A quasi-experimental study was conducted in a medical-surgical ICU. Multiple interventions to optimize SS and SSh shock patients' clinical outcomes were performed by applying sepsis bundles (6- and 24-hour) in May 2006. We compared bundle compliance and patient outcomes before (July 2005-April 2006) and after (May 2006-December 2009) implementation of the interventions.

RESULTS

A total of 564 SS and SSh patients were identified. Prior to the intervention, compliance with the 6 hour-sepsis resuscitation bundle was only 6%. After the intervention, compliance was as follows: 8.2% from May to December 2006, 9.3% in 2007, 21.1% in 2008 and 13.7% in 2009. For the 24 hour-management bundle, baseline compliance was 15.0%. After the intervention, compliance was 15.1% from May to December 2006, 21.4% in 2007, 27.8% in 2008 and 44.4% in 2009. The in-hospital mortality was 54.0% from July 2005 to April 2006, 41.1% from May to December 2006, 39.3% in 2007, 41.4% in 2008 and 16.2% in 2009.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest reducing SS and SSh patient mortality is a complex process that involves multiple performance measures and interventions.

摘要

背景

为了降低发病率和死亡率,《拯救脓毒症运动(SSC)严重脓毒症(SS)和脓毒性休克(SSh)管理指南》被推荐用于临床。

材料和方法

这是一项在外科重症监护病房(ICU)进行的准实验研究。通过 2006 年 5 月应用脓毒症包(6 小时和 24 小时)对 SS 和 SSh 休克患者进行了多项干预,以优化其临床结局。我们比较了干预前后(2005 年 7 月-2006 年 4 月和 2006 年 5 月-2009 年 12 月)包裹依从性和患者结局。

结果

共纳入 564 例 SS 和 SSh 患者。在干预之前,6 小时脓毒症复苏包的依从性仅为 6%。干预后,依从性如下:2006 年 5 月至 12 月为 8.2%,2007 年为 9.3%,2008 年为 21.1%,2009 年为 13.7%。对于 24 小时管理包,基线依从性为 15.0%。干预后,2006 年 5 月至 12 月为 15.1%,2007 年为 21.4%,2008 年为 27.8%,2009 年为 44.4%。2005 年 7 月至 2006 年 4 月住院死亡率为 54.0%,2006 年 5 月至 12 月为 41.1%,2007 年为 39.3%,2008 年为 41.4%,2009 年为 16.2%。

结论

这些结果表明,降低 SS 和 SSh 患者的死亡率是一个复杂的过程,需要多项绩效措施和干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b647/3207817/4164430ff6b6/pone.0026790.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b647/3207817/4164430ff6b6/pone.0026790.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b647/3207817/4164430ff6b6/pone.0026790.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Decreasing mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock patients by implementing a sepsis bundle in a hospital setting.在医院环境中实施脓毒症捆绑治疗以降低严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的死亡率。
PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e26790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026790. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
2
Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain.西班牙一项多中心严重脓毒症教育项目实施后护理过程及结局的改善
JAMA. 2008 May 21;299(19):2294-303. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.19.2294.
3
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: association between performance metrics and outcomes in a 7.5-year study.拯救脓毒症运动:一项为期7.5年的研究中绩效指标与结果之间的关联
Crit Care Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):3-12. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000723.
4
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: association between performance metrics and outcomes in a 7.5-year study.拯救脓毒症运动:一项长达 7.5 年的研究中,绩效指标与结局之间的关系。
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Nov;40(11):1623-33. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3496-0. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
5
Guideline bundles adherence and mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock.严重脓毒症和感染性休克中指南集束的依从性与死亡率
Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug;42(8):1890-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000297.
6
Resuscitation bundle compliance in severe sepsis and septic shock: improves survival, is better late than never.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克中复苏集束化治疗的依从性:可提高生存率,亡羊补牢,为时未晚。
J Intensive Care Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(5):304-13. doi: 10.1177/0885066610392499. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
7
Effect of performance improvement programs on compliance with sepsis bundles and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.绩效改进计划对脓毒症集束化治疗依从性及死亡率的影响:一项观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 May 6;10(5):e0125827. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125827. eCollection 2015.
8
Mortality rate among patients with septic shock after implementation of 6-hour sepsis protocol in the emergency department of Thammasat University Hospital.泰国国立法政大学医院急诊科实施6小时脓毒症治疗方案后脓毒性休克患者的死亡率
J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Aug;97 Suppl 8:S182-93.
9
Implementation of early goal-directed therapy and the surviving sepsis campaign resuscitation bundle in Asia.亚洲地区早期目标导向治疗和拯救脓毒症运动复苏捆绑方案的实施情况。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Oct;24(5):452-62. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs045. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
10
Relationship Between a Sepsis Intervention Bundle and In-Hospital Mortality Among Hospitalized Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Data.脓毒症干预集束与住院患者院内死亡率之间的关系:基于真实世界数据的回顾性分析
Anesth Analg. 2017 Aug;125(2):507-513. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002085.

引用本文的文献

1
A nursing-led sepsis response team guiding resuscitation with point-of-care ultrasound: A review and model for improving bundle compliance while individualizing sepsis care.由护士主导的脓毒症应对团队利用床旁超声指导复苏:提高集束化方案依从性并实现脓毒症个体化治疗的综述与模式
SAGE Open Med. 2024 Nov 8;12:20503121241290378. doi: 10.1177/20503121241290378. eCollection 2024.
2
Risk factors for mortality from sepsis in an intensive care unit in Ecuador: A prospective study.厄瓜多尔重症监护病房脓毒症患者死亡的危险因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Mar 18;101(11). doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029096.
3
Prevalence and outcome of sepsis and septic shock in intensive care units in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A prospective observational study.

本文引用的文献

1
Tight glucose control versus intermediate glucose control: a quasi-experimental study.严格血糖控制与中等血糖控制:一项准实验研究。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010 May;38(3):467-73. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1003800309.
2
Impact of a program to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infection in the zero tolerance era.零容忍时代预防中心静脉导管相关血流感染项目的影响。
Am J Infect Control. 2010 Aug;38(6):434-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.11.012. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
3
Impact of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign protocols on hospital length of stay and mortality in septic shock patients: results of a three-year follow-up quasi-experimental study.
埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴重症监护病房中脓毒症和脓毒性休克的患病率及转归:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Afr J Emerg Med. 2021 Mar;11(1):188-195. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2020.10.001. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
4
Compliance with 6 h-Sepsis Resuscitation Bundle of Surviving Sepsis Campaign before and after Resident Physicians' Training: A Quality Improvement Interventional Study among Indian Patients.住院医师培训前后对脓毒症存活行动6小时脓毒症复苏集束化治疗的依从性:一项针对印度患者的质量改进干预性研究
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2019 Jan-Mar;12(1):3-9. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_26_18.
5
Characteristics and outcomes of patients with community-acquired and hospital-acquired sepsis.社区获得性和医院获得性脓毒症患者的特征及预后
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2019 Jan-Mar;31(1):71-78. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20190013.
6
An electronic warning system helps reduce the time to diagnosis of sepsis.电子预警系统有助于缩短脓毒症的诊断时间。
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2018 Oct-Dec;30(4):414-422. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20180059. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
7
Single-blinded, randomized, and controlled clinical trial evaluating the effects of Omega-3 fatty acids among septic patients with intestinal dysfunction: A pilot study.评估ω-3脂肪酸对脓毒症伴肠功能障碍患者影响的单盲、随机对照临床试验:一项初步研究。
Exp Ther Med. 2017 Aug;14(2):1505-1511. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4680. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
8
The impact of a multifaceted intervention including sepsis electronic alert system and sepsis response team on the outcomes of patients with sepsis and septic shock.包括脓毒症电子警报系统和脓毒症应对小组在内的多方面干预措施对脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者预后的影响。
Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;7(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0280-7. Epub 2017 May 30.
9
Effect of a multifaceted educational intervention for anti-infectious measures on sepsis mortality: a cluster randomized trial.多方面教育干预对抗感染措施对脓毒症死亡率的影响:一项集群随机试验。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Nov;43(11):1602-1612. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4782-4. Epub 2017 May 2.
10
Early traditional Chinese medicine bundle therapy for the prevention of sepsis acute gastrointestinal injury in elderly patients with severe sepsis.早期中医捆绑疗法预防老年严重脓毒症患者脓毒症急性胃肠损伤。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 6;7:46015. doi: 10.1038/srep46015.
《存活脓毒症运动方案对脓毒性休克患者住院时间和死亡率的影响:一项为期三年的随访类实验研究结果》。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Apr;38(4):1036-43. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181d455b6.
4
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis.拯救脓毒症运动:以严重脓毒症为目标的基于国际指南的绩效改进计划的结果。
Crit Care Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):367-74. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cb0cdc.
5
Implementation of a bundle of actions to improve adherence to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines at the ED.实施一系列行动以提高急诊科对《拯救脓毒症运动指南》的依从性。
Am J Emerg Med. 2009 Jul;27(6):668-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.05.010.
6
Surviving sepsis in low-income and middle-income countries: new directions for care and research.低收入和中等收入国家的脓毒症生存:护理与研究的新方向
Lancet Infect Dis. 2009 Sep;9(9):577-82. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70135-5.
7
Successful prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in an intensive care setting.重症监护环境中呼吸机相关性肺炎的成功预防
Am J Infect Control. 2009 Oct;37(8):619-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.03.009. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
8
Australasian resuscitation of sepsis evaluation (ARISE): A multi-centre, prospective, inception cohort study.澳大利亚脓毒症复苏评估研究(ARISE):一项多中心、前瞻性、起始队列研究。
Resuscitation. 2009 Jul;80(7):811-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.03.008. Epub 2009 May 20.
9
Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients.危重症患者强化血糖控制与常规血糖控制的比较
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1283-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810625. Epub 2009 Mar 24.
10
Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain.西班牙一项多中心严重脓毒症教育项目实施后护理过程及结局的改善
JAMA. 2008 May 21;299(19):2294-303. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.19.2294.