Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet Stockholm, and School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Sweden.
Vaccine. 2012 Jun 19;30(29):4336-40. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.10.074. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
Numerous epidemiological studies suggest that there is an inverse relationship between "immunologically mediated diseases of affluence", such as allergy, diabetes and inflammatory bowel disease on one hand and few infections encountered in early childhood, on the other hand. Careful analysis of the epidemiological, clinical and animal studies taken together, however, suggests that the protection is mediated by broad exposure to a wealth of commensal, non-pathogenic microorganisms early in life, rather than by infections. Microbial exposure has little relationship with "hygiene" in the usual meaning of the word and the term "hygiene hypothesis" is therefore misleading. A better term would be "microbial deprivation hypothesis". The suggestion that childhood infections would protect against allergic disease led to unfortunate speculations that vaccinations would increase the risk for allergies and diabetes. Numerous epidemiological studies have therefore been conducted, searching for a possible relationship between various childhood vaccinations on one hand and allergy on the other hand. It is reasonable from these studies to conclude that vaccinations against infectious agents neither significantly increase, nor reduce the likelihood of immunologically mediated diseases. It is established that the postnatal maturation of immune regulation is largely driven by exposure to microbes. Germ free animals manifest excessive immune responses when immunised and they do not develop normal immune regulatory function. The gut is by far the largest source of microbial exposure, as the human gut microbiome contains up to 1014 bacteria, i.e. ten times the number of cells in the human body. Several studies in recent years have shown differences in the composition of the gut microbiota between allergic and non-allergic individuals and between infants living in countries with a low and a high prevalence of immune mediated diseases. The administration of probiotic bacteria to pregnant mothers and postnatal to their infants has immune modulatory effects. So far, however, probiotic bacteria do not seem to significantly enhance immune responses to vaccines. The potential to improve vaccine responses by modifying the gut microbiota in infants and the possibility to employ probiotic bacteria as adjuvants and/or delivery vehicles, is currently explored in several laboratories. Although to date few clinical results have been reported, experimental studies have shown some encouraging results.
大量的流行病学研究表明,一方面,过敏、糖尿病和炎症性肠病等“与免疫相关的富裕病”与儿童早期接触的少数感染之间存在反比关系;另一方面,综合分析流行病学、临床和动物研究表明,这种保护作用是通过广泛接触丰富的共生、非致病性微生物而介导的,而不是通过感染。微生物暴露与通常意义上的“卫生”关系不大,因此“卫生假说”这个术语具有误导性。一个更好的术语是“微生物剥夺假说”。儿童期感染会预防过敏疾病的说法导致了不幸的推测,即疫苗接种会增加过敏和糖尿病的风险。因此,进行了大量的流行病学研究,以寻找儿童期各种疫苗接种与过敏之间的可能关系。从这些研究中可以合理地得出结论,针对传染性病原体的疫苗接种既不会显著增加,也不会降低免疫介导疾病的可能性。已经确定,免疫调节的产后成熟在很大程度上是由接触微生物驱动的。无菌动物在免疫时表现出过度的免疫反应,并且它们不会发展出正常的免疫调节功能。肠道是迄今为止最大的微生物暴露来源,因为人类肠道微生物组中含有多达 1014 个细菌,即人体细胞数量的 10 倍。近年来的几项研究表明,过敏和非过敏个体之间以及生活在免疫介导疾病低流行和高流行国家的婴儿之间的肠道微生物群组成存在差异。给孕妇和产后婴儿服用益生菌具有免疫调节作用。然而,到目前为止,益生菌似乎并没有显著增强对疫苗的免疫反应。通过改变婴儿肠道微生物群来提高疫苗反应的潜力,以及将益生菌作为佐剂和/或递送载体的可能性,目前正在几家实验室进行探索。尽管迄今为止报告的临床结果很少,但实验研究已经显示出一些令人鼓舞的结果。
Vaccine. 2011-11-8
Nestle Nutr Workshop Ser Pediatr Program. 2009
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009-6
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2012-11
Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2012-12
Br J Nutr. 2010-8
Benef Microbes. 2010-11
Br J Nutr. 2006-10
Front Allergy. 2023-3-14
Front Allergy. 2022-11-24
Curr Opin Virol. 2019-6-1
Indian J Clin Biochem. 2018-7
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015
Clin Transl Allergy. 2014-6-25