Brown Aisling F, Leech John M, Rogers Thomas R, McLoughlin Rachel M
Host-Pathogen Interactions Group, School of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity Biomedical Sciences Institute , Dublin , Ireland.
Sir Patrick Dun Laboratory, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Trinity College Dublin, St James's Hospital , Dublin , Ireland.
Front Immunol. 2014 Jan 8;4:507. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00507.
In apparent contrast to its invasive potential Staphylococcus aureus colonizes the anterior nares of 20-80% of the human population. The relationship between host and microbe appears particularly individualized and colonization status seems somehow predetermined. After decolonization, persistent carriers often become re-colonized with their prior S. aureus strain, whereas non-carriers resist experimental colonization. Efforts to identify factors facilitating colonization have thus far largely focused on the microorganism rather than on the human host. The host responds to S. aureus nasal colonization via local expression of anti-microbial peptides, lipids, and cytokines. Interplay with the co-existing microbiota also influences colonization and immune regulation. Transient or persistent S. aureus colonization induces specific systemic immune responses. Humoral responses are the most studied of these and little is known of cellular responses induced by colonization. Intriguingly, colonized patients who develop bacteremia may have a lower S. aureus-attributable mortality than their non-colonized counterparts. This could imply a staphylococcal-specific immune "priming" or immunomodulation occurring as a consequence of colonization and impacting on the outcome of infection. This has yet to be fully explored. An effective vaccine remains elusive. Anti-S. aureus vaccine strategies may need to drive both humoral and cellular immune responses to confer efficient protection. Understanding the influence of colonization on adaptive response is essential to intelligent vaccine design, and may determine the efficacy of vaccine-mediated immunity. Clinical trials should consider colonization status and the resulting impact of this on individual patient responses. We urgently need an increased appreciation of colonization and its modulation of host immunity.
与金黄色葡萄球菌的侵袭潜力形成明显对比的是,它定植于20%-80%人群的前鼻孔。宿主与微生物之间的关系似乎具有很强的个体特异性,而定植状态似乎在某种程度上是预先确定的。在去定植后,持续携带者常常会被其先前的金黄色葡萄球菌菌株重新定植,而非携带者则能抵抗实验性定植。迄今为止,确定促进定植因素的努力主要集中在微生物而非人类宿主身上。宿主通过局部表达抗菌肽、脂质和细胞因子来应对金黄色葡萄球菌的鼻腔定植。与共存微生物群的相互作用也会影响定植和免疫调节。短暂或持续的金黄色葡萄球菌定植会诱导特定的全身免疫反应。其中,体液反应是研究最多的,而定植诱导的细胞反应则知之甚少。有趣的是,发生菌血症的定植患者的金黄色葡萄球菌归因死亡率可能低于未定植患者。这可能意味着定植会引发葡萄球菌特异性免疫“启动”或免疫调节,并影响感染的结局。这一点尚未得到充分探索。有效的疫苗仍然难以实现。抗金黄色葡萄球菌疫苗策略可能需要激发体液和细胞免疫反应以提供有效的保护。了解定植对适应性反应的影响对于智能疫苗设计至关重要,并且可能决定疫苗介导免疫的效果。临床试验应考虑定植状态及其对个体患者反应的影响。我们迫切需要提高对定植及其对宿主免疫调节的认识。