College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, UK.
Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Jan;33(1):31-5. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.10.009. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
It might appear odd or even perverse to be arguing for the essay as a vehicle for academic thought and writing, particularly given the current emphasis on scientific research and evidence-based practice. In fact, the scholarly essay has virtually ceased to exist as an academic form in practice disciplines such as nursing, excluded by what we will identify and refer to as the hegemony of the laboratory. In a practical as well as an intellectual attempt to reinstate it, this paper is structured in the form of two consecutive short essays. In the first, we identify the character, features and purpose of the scholarly essay and examine its demise as an academic form. In the second, we explore some possible reasons why the essay never became fully accepted as an academic form in nursing. We suggest that the essay is thematically eclectic and stylistically promiscuous, drawing from a broad range of cultural, disciplinary and academic reference points. As such, it presents a challenge to the dominant technical rational approach to academic nursing in both its form and its content, particularly in its disregard for the rigidly imposed genres and structures increasingly demanded by academic nursing journals.
将论文作为学术思想和写作的载体似乎有些奇怪,甚至有些反常,尤其是在当前强调科学研究和基于证据的实践的情况下。事实上,在护理等实践学科中,学术论文实际上已经不再作为一种学术形式存在,被我们称之为实验室霸权的东西所排斥。本文试图以实际和理智的方式恢复它,以两个连续的短文的形式构建。在第一部分中,我们确定了学术论文的特点、特征和目的,并研究了它作为一种学术形式的消亡。在第二部分中,我们探讨了为什么论文从未在护理领域完全被接受为一种学术形式的一些可能原因。我们认为,论文在主题上是折衷的,在风格上是混杂的,从广泛的文化、学科和学术参考点中汲取灵感。因此,它在形式和内容上都对占主导地位的护理学术技术理性方法提出了挑战,尤其是在它不重视学术护理期刊日益要求的严格规定的体裁和结构方面。