Suppr超能文献

阅读与健康老龄化:句子信息结构的影响。

Reading in healthy ageing: the influence of information structuring in sentences.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Psychol Aging. 2012 Jun;27(2):529-40. doi: 10.1037/a0026028. Epub 2011 Nov 14.

Abstract

In three experiments, we investigated the cognitive effects of linguistic prominence to establish whether focus plays a similar or different role in modulating language processing in healthy ageing. Information structuring through the use of cleft sentences is known to increase the processing efficiency of anaphoric references to elements contained with a marked focus structure. It also protects these elements from becoming suppressed in the wake of subsequent information, suggesting selective mechanisms of enhancement and suppression. In Experiment 1 (using self-paced reading), we found that focus enhanced (faster) integration for anaphors referring to words contained within the scope of focus; but suppressed (slower) integration for anaphors to words contained outside of the scope of focus; and in some cases, the effects were larger in older adults. In Experiment 2 (using change detection), we showed that older adults relied more on the linguistic structure to enhance change detection when the changed word was in focus. In Experiment 3 (using delayed probe recognition and eye-tracking), we found that older adults recognized probes more accurately when they were made to elements within the scope of focus than when they were outside the scope of focus. These results indicate that older adults' ability to selectively attend or suppress concepts in a marked focus structure is preserved.

摘要

在三项实验中,我们研究了语言突出程度对认知的影响,以确定焦点在调节健康老龄化人群的语言处理中是否发挥相似或不同的作用。通过使用分裂句进行信息结构组织,已知可以提高对包含在标记焦点结构中的元素的回指参考的处理效率。它还可以防止这些元素在后续信息的影响下被抑制,这表明存在选择性增强和抑制机制。在实验 1(使用自定步速阅读)中,我们发现焦点增强(加快)了对包含在焦点范围内的单词的回指的整合;但对包含在焦点范围外的单词的回指的整合则受到抑制(变慢);在某些情况下,老年人的效果更大。在实验 2(使用变化检测)中,我们表明,当变化的单词处于焦点时,老年人更多地依赖语言结构来增强变化检测。在实验 3(使用延迟探针识别和眼动跟踪)中,我们发现当探针指向焦点范围内的元素时,老年人对探针的识别更准确,而当探针指向焦点范围外的元素时,识别则不准确。这些结果表明,老年人在标记焦点结构中选择性关注或抑制概念的能力得以保留。

相似文献

1
Reading in healthy ageing: the influence of information structuring in sentences.
Psychol Aging. 2012 Jun;27(2):529-40. doi: 10.1037/a0026028. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
2
Age differences in resolving anaphoric expressions during reading.
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2011 Nov;18(6):678-707. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2011.607228. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
3
Enhancement and suppression effects resulting from information structuring in sentences.
Mem Cognit. 2009 Sep;37(6):880-8. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.6.880.
4
Constituent order and semantic parallelism in online comprehension: eye-tracking evidence from German.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2009 Dec;62(12):2338-71. doi: 10.1080/17470210902790070. Epub 2009 May 2.
5
Task effects on eye movements during reading.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Nov;36(6):1561-6. doi: 10.1037/a0020693.
6
[Text comprehension, cognitive resources and aging].
Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2007 Mar;5(1):47-64.
7
The contributions of attention and working memory to age differences in concept identification.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2004 Apr;26(2):227-45. doi: 10.1076/jcen.26.2.227.28083.
8
The effects of ageing and visual noise on conceptual integration during sentence reading.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(9):1833-47. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.674146. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
9
Attention, working memory, and grammaticality judgment in typical young adults.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Jun;54(3):918-31. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0009). Epub 2010 Nov 24.
10
Spatial distance effects on incremental semantic interpretation of abstract sentences: evidence from eye tracking.
Cognition. 2014 Dec;133(3):535-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Sep 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Noise-Vocoded Sentence Recognition and the Use of Context in Older and Younger Adult Listeners.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Jan 12;66(1):365-381. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00184. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
2
Are older adults more risky readers? Evidence from meta-analysis.
Psychol Aging. 2022 Mar;37(2):239-259. doi: 10.1037/pag0000522. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
4
Focus takes time: structural effects on reading.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Dec;22(6):1733-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0843-2.
5
The manuscript that we finished: structural separation reduces the cost of complement coercion.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Mar;41(2):526-40. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000042. Epub 2014 Jul 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验