Folland E D, Parisi A F, Comei C
Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Brigham.
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1990 Aug;20(4):271-5. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810200413.
Estimation of the aortic valve gradient by simultaneous recording of left ventricular and peripheral arterial pressures is subject to error due to delay and modulation of the arterial pressure contour as it propagates from the ascending aorta. This error can be corrected by averaging the mean gradients derived from unaltered and temporally aligned simultaneous left ventricular-peripheral arterial pressure tracings. In 26 patients with aortic stenosis and simultaneous recordings of ascending aortic and femoral arterial pressure we compared this method with a simplified approach in which the peripheral arterial pressure is partially aligned by advancing it against the left ventricular pressure by 50% of the time delay of the simultaneously recorded upstrokes. Gradients measured this way predicted the true aortic valve gradients (left ventricular-ascending aortic) with a mean difference of +1.1 mm Hg (range = +10 to -5 mm Hg). We recommend use of this simplified method of correction because it predicts true aortic valve gradient equally well as the averaging technique (r = 0.977 vs. 0.979) and requires half the time and effort.
通过同时记录左心室和外周动脉压力来估计主动脉瓣压差,由于动脉压力轮廓从升主动脉传播时存在延迟和调制,会产生误差。这种误差可以通过对未改变且时间对齐的同时左心室 - 外周动脉压力描记图得出的平均压差进行平均来校正。在26例主动脉瓣狭窄患者中,同时记录了升主动脉和股动脉压力,我们将这种方法与一种简化方法进行了比较,在简化方法中,外周动脉压力通过将其相对于左心室压力提前同时记录的上升支延迟时间的50%来部分对齐。以这种方式测量的压差预测真实主动脉瓣压差(左心室 - 升主动脉)的平均差值为 +1.1 mmHg(范围 = +10至 -5 mmHg)。我们建议使用这种简化的校正方法,因为它预测真实主动脉瓣压差的效果与平均技术相同(r = 0.977对0.979),并且所需时间和精力仅为一半。