St Vincent's Clinic/UNSW/VCCRI, Darlinghurst, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2012 Feb;14(1):8-20. doi: 10.1007/s11906-011-0236-5.
Our purpose is to review noninvasive methods for measuring central arterial pressure. Indices of central arterial pressure measured from central aortic and peripheral arterial waveforms have shown value in predicting cardiovascular events and death, as well as in guiding therapeutic management. This article reviews noninvasive techniques of measuring central arterial pressure that have been validated against intra-arterial pressure. This paper explains methods to derive central (aortic and carotid) pressure from radial and brachial sites. It focuses on specific issues of brachial calibration applied to carotid pressure waveforms, which were regarded as a surrogate of aortic pressures used in three major studies (Framingham, Asklepios, and Australian National Blood Pressure 2 studies). We explain why radial-based methods are superior to carotid-based methods for estimating central pressure. Physiological principles of pressure measurement need be satisfied to ensure accurate recording.
我们的目的是回顾用于测量中心动脉压的无创方法。从中心主动脉和外周动脉波形测量的中心动脉压指标已被证明在预测心血管事件和死亡方面具有价值,并且在指导治疗管理方面也具有价值。本文综述了已通过与动脉内压进行验证的测量中心动脉压的无创技术。本文介绍了从桡动脉和肱动脉部位推导中心(主动脉和颈动脉)压的方法。它重点介绍了应用于颈动脉压力波形的肱动脉校准的具体问题,这在三项主要研究(Framingham、Asklepios 和澳大利亚国家血压 2 项研究)中被视为主动脉压的替代方法。我们解释了为什么基于桡动脉的方法优于基于颈动脉的方法来估计中心压。需要满足压力测量的生理原理以确保准确记录。