• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Quantification of image quality using information theory.

作者信息

Niimi Takanaga, Maeda Hisatoshi, Ikeda Mitsuru, Imai Kuniharu

机构信息

Department of Radiological Technology, Nagoya University School of Health Sciences, 1-1-20 Daiko-minami, Higashi-ku, Nagoya 461-8673, Japan.

出版信息

Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2011 Dec;34(4):481-8. doi: 10.1007/s13246-011-0108-y. Epub 2011 Nov 15.

DOI:10.1007/s13246-011-0108-y
PMID:22083504
Abstract

Aims of present study were to examine usefulness of information theory in visual assessment of image quality. We applied first order approximation of the Shannon's information theory to compute information losses (IL). Images of a contrast-detail mammography (CDMAM) phantom were acquired with computed radiographies for various radiation doses. Information content was defined as the entropy Σp( i )log(1/p ( i )), in which detection probabilities p ( i ) were calculated from distribution of detection rate of the CDMAM. IL was defined as the difference between information content and information obtained. IL decreased with increases in the disk diameters (P < 0.0001, ANOVA) and in the radiation doses (P < 0.002, F-test). Sums of IL, which we call total information losses (TIL), were closely correlated with the image quality figures (r = 0.985). TIL was dependent on the distribution of image reading ability of each examinee, even when average reading ratio was the same in the group. TIL was shown to be sensitive to the observers' distribution of image readings and was expected to improve the evaluation of image quality.

摘要

相似文献

1
Quantification of image quality using information theory.
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2011 Dec;34(4):481-8. doi: 10.1007/s13246-011-0108-y. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
2
Contrast-detail phantom scoring methodology.对比细节体模评分方法。
Med Phys. 2005 Mar;32(3):807-14. doi: 10.1118/1.1862097.
3
Information loss in visual assessments of medical images.医学图像视觉评估中的信息损失。
Eur J Radiol. 2007 Feb;61(2):362-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.09.009. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
4
Toward objective and quantitative evaluation of imaging systems using images of phantoms.迈向使用体模图像对成像系统进行客观和定量评估。
Med Phys. 2006 Jan;33(1):83-95. doi: 10.1118/1.2140117.
5
A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.全视野数字乳腺摄影系统客观与主观图像质量测量的比较
Phys Med Biol. 2006 May 21;51(10):2441-63. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/10/006. Epub 2006 Apr 26.
6
Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part II. NPWE as a validated alternative for contrast detail analysis.数字乳腺 X 线摄影中的图像质量评估:第二部分。NPWE 作为对比细节分析的经过验证的替代方法。
Phys Med Biol. 2011 Jul 21;56(14):4221-38. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/14/003. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
7
Study of digital mammographic equipments by phantom image quality.通过体模图像质量对数字乳腺摄影设备的研究。
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;2006:1994-6. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2006.259245.
8
Automated analysis of phantom images for the evaluation of long-term reproducibility in digital mammography.用于评估数字乳腺摄影长期再现性的体模图像自动分析
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Mar 7;52(5):1387-407. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/5/012. Epub 2007 Feb 8.
9
Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: an overview.全视野数字乳腺摄影中的图像质量测量与指标:综述
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;117(1-3):120-30. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nci711. Epub 2006 Feb 3.
10
[Image quality and optical density in mammography: study on phantoms].
J Radiol. 1998 Apr;79(4):331-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Thermodynamics-Based Evaluation of Various Improved Shannon Entropies for Configurational Information of Gray-Level Images.基于热力学的灰度图像构型信息各种改进香农熵评估
Entropy (Basel). 2018 Jan 2;20(1):19. doi: 10.3390/e20010019.