C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Élisabeth Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON.
Can Fam Physician. 2011 Nov;57(11):1300-9.
To assess whether the model of service delivery affects the equity of the care provided across age groups.
Cross-sectional study.
Ontario.
One hundred thirty-seven practices, including traditional fee-for-service practices, salaried community health centres (CHCs), and capitation-based family health networks and health service organizations.
To compare the quality of care across age groups using multilevel linear or logistic regressions. Health service delivery measures and health promotion were assessed through patient surveys (N = 5111), which were based on the Primary Care Assessment Tool, and prevention and chronic disease management were assessed, based on Canadian recommendations for care, through chart abstraction (N = 4108).
Older individuals reported better health service delivery in all models. This age effect ranged from 1.9% to 5.7%, and was larger in the 2 capitation-based models. Individuals aged younger than 30 years attending CHCs had more features of disadvantage (ie, living below the poverty line and without high school education) and were more likely than older individuals to report discussing at least 1 health promotion subject at the index visit. These differences were deemed an appropriate response to greater needs in these younger individuals. The prevention score showed an age-sex interaction in all models, with adherence to recommended care dropping with age for women. These results are largely attributable to the fact that maneuvers recommended for younger women are considerably more likely to be performed than other maneuvers. Chronic disease management scores showed an inverted U relationship with age in fee-for-service practices, family health networks, and health service organizations but not in CHCs.
The salaried model might have an organizational structure that is more conducive to providing appropriate care across age groups. The thrust toward adopting capitation-based payment is unlikely to have an effect on age disparities.
评估服务提供模式是否会影响各年龄段护理的公平性。
横断面研究。
安大略省。
137 家诊所,包括传统的按服务收费模式、受薪社区卫生中心(CHC)、按人头付费的家庭健康网络和卫生服务组织。
使用多层线性或逻辑回归比较各年龄段的护理质量。通过患者调查(N=5111)评估卫生服务提供措施和健康促进情况,调查内容基于初级保健评估工具;通过图表摘录(N=4108),根据加拿大护理建议评估预防和慢性病管理情况。
在所有模式中,年龄较大的个体报告的卫生服务提供情况更好。这种年龄效应范围为 1.9%至 5.7%,在 2 个按人头付费模式中更大。在 CHC 就诊的年龄小于 30 岁的个体有更多的劣势特征(即生活在贫困线以下且未接受过高中教育),并且比年龄较大的个体更有可能在就诊时至少讨论 1 个健康促进主题。这些差异被认为是对这些年轻个体更大需求的适当回应。预防评分在所有模式中均存在年龄-性别交互作用,女性遵医嘱进行护理的比例随年龄增长而下降。这些结果在很大程度上归因于这样一个事实,即推荐给年轻女性的操作更有可能实施,而其他操作则不然。在按服务收费模式、家庭健康网络和卫生服务组织中,慢性病管理评分与年龄呈倒 U 型关系,但在 CHC 中则不然。
受薪模式的组织结构可能更有利于为各年龄段提供适当的护理。采用按人头付费的趋势不太可能对年龄差异产生影响。