Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Front Public Health. 2021 Oct 27;9:750122. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.750122. eCollection 2021.
The benefits of prevention are widely recognized; ranging from avoiding disease onset to substantially reducing disease burden, which is especially relevant considering the increasing prevalence of chronic diseases. However, its delivery has encountered numerous obstacles in healthcare. While healthcare professionals play an important role in stimulating prevention, their behaviors can be influenced by incentives related to reimbursement schemes. The purpose of this research is to obtain a detailed description and explanation of how reimbursement schemes specifically impact primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary prevention. Our study takes a mixed-methods approach. Based on a rapid review of the literature, we include and assess 27 studies. Moreover, we conducted semi-structured interviews with eight Dutch healthcare professionals and two representatives of insurance companies, to obtain a deeper understanding of healthcare professionals' behaviors in response to incentives. Nor fee-for-service (FFS) nor salary can be unambiguously linked to higher or lower provision of preventive services. However, results suggest that FFS's widely reported incentive to increase production might work in favor of preventive services such as immunizations but provide less incentives for chronic disease management. Salary's incentive toward prevention will be (partially) determined by provider-organization's characteristics and reimbursement. Pay-for-performance (P4P) is not always necessarily translated into better health outcomes, effective prevention, or adequate chronic disease management. P4P is considered disruptive by professionals and our results expose how it can lead professionals to resort to (over)medicalization in order to achieve targets. Relatively new forms of reimbursement such as population-based payment may incentivize professionals to adapt the delivery of care to facilitate the delivery of some forms of prevention. There is not one reimbursement scheme that will stimulate all levels of prevention. Certain types of reimbursement work well for certain types of preventive care services. A volume incentive could be beneficial for prevention activities that are easy to specify. Population-based capitation can help promote preventive activities that require efforts that are not incentivized under other reimbursements, for instance activities that are not easily specified, such as providing education on lifestyle factors related to a patient's (chronic) disease.
预防的好处已被广泛认可;从避免疾病发作到大大减轻疾病负担,这在考虑到慢性病的患病率不断上升的情况下尤为重要。然而,在医疗保健中,它的实施遇到了许多障碍。虽然医疗保健专业人员在激发预防方面发挥着重要作用,但他们的行为可能会受到与报销计划相关的激励因素的影响。本研究的目的是详细描述和解释报销计划如何具体影响初级、二级、三级和四级预防。我们的研究采用混合方法。基于对文献的快速审查,我们包括并评估了 27 项研究。此外,我们还对 8 名荷兰医疗保健专业人员和 2 名保险公司代表进行了半结构化访谈,以更深入地了解医疗保健专业人员对激励措施的反应行为。无论是按服务收费(FFS)还是薪水都不能明确地与提供更多或更少的预防服务联系起来。然而,结果表明,FFS 广泛报道的增加生产的激励措施可能有利于免疫等预防服务,但对慢性病管理的激励措施较少。薪水对预防的激励将(部分)由提供者组织的特点和报销决定。按绩效付费(P4P)并不总是必然转化为更好的健康结果、有效的预防或适当的慢性病管理。P4P 被专业人士认为具有颠覆性,我们的研究结果揭示了它如何导致专业人士诉诸(过度)医疗化以实现目标。相对较新的报销形式,如基于人群的支付,可能会激励专业人员调整护理交付方式,以促进某些形式的预防。没有一种报销方案可以刺激所有级别的预防。某些类型的报销方案对某些类型的预防保健服务效果良好。对于易于指定的预防活动,数量激励可能是有益的。基于人群的总额支付可以帮助促进那些在其他报销方式下没有激励的预防活动,例如不易指定的活动,例如提供与患者(慢性)疾病相关的生活方式因素的教育。