• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外周动脉支架的磁共振血管造影:22种不同支架类型的体外评估

MR Angiography of Peripheral Arterial Stents: In Vitro Evaluation of 22 Different Stent Types.

作者信息

Burg Matthias C, Bunck Alexander C, Seifarth Harald, Buerke Boris, Kugel Harald, Hesselmann Volker, Köhler Michael, Heindel Walter, Maintz David

机构信息

Department of Clinical Radiology, University of Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Str. 33, 48149 Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Radiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:478175. doi: 10.1155/2011/478175. Epub 2010 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1155/2011/478175
PMID:22091380
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3197262/
Abstract

Purpose. To evaluate stent lumen visibility of a large sample of different peripheral arterial (iliac, renal, carotid) stents using magnetic resonance angiography in vitro. Materials and Methods. 21 different stents and one stentgraft (10 nitinol, 7 316L, 2 tantalum, 1 cobalt superalloy, 1 PET + cobalt superalloy, and 1 platinum alloy) were examined in a vessel phantom (vessel diameters ranging from 5 to 13 mm) filled with a solution of Gd-DTPA. Stents were imaged at 1.5 Tesla using a T1-weighted 3D spoiled gradient-echo sequence. Image analysis was performed measuring three categories: Signal intensity in the stent lumen, lumen visibility of the stented lumen, and homogeneity of the stented lumen. The results were classified using a 3-point scale (good, intermediate, and poor results). Results. 7 stents showed good MR lumen visibility (4x nitinol, 2x tantalum, and 1x cobalt superalloy). 9 stents showed intermediate results (5x nitinol, 2x 316L, 1x PET + cobalt superalloy, and 1x platinum alloy) and 6 stents showed poor results (1x nitinol, and 5x 316L). Conclusion. Stent lumen visibility varies depending on the stent material and type. Some products show good lumen visibility which may allow the detection of stenoses inside the lumen, while other products cause artifacts which prevent reliable evaluation of the stent lumen with this technique.

摘要

目的。在体外使用磁共振血管造影术评估大量不同外周动脉(髂动脉、肾动脉、颈动脉)支架的支架管腔可视性。材料与方法。在充满钆喷酸葡胺溶液的血管模型(血管直径范围为5至13毫米)中检查21种不同的支架和1种支架移植物(10种镍钛合金、7种316L不锈钢、2种钽、1种钴基高温合金、1种聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯 + 钴基高温合金以及1种铂合金)。使用T1加权三维扰相梯度回波序列在1.5特斯拉场强下对支架进行成像。进行图像分析时测量三类指标:支架管腔内的信号强度、支架管腔的可视性以及支架管腔的均匀性。结果采用三分制进行分类(良好、中等和差)。结果。7种支架显示出良好的磁共振管腔可视性(4种镍钛合金、2种钽和1种钴基高温合金)。9种支架显示出中等结果(5种镍钛合金、2种316L不锈钢、1种聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯 + 钴基高温合金和1种铂合金),6种支架显示出较差结果(1种镍钛合金和5种316L不锈钢)。结论。支架管腔可视性因支架材料和类型而异。一些产品显示出良好的管腔可视性,这可能有助于检测管腔内的狭窄,而其他产品会产生伪影,妨碍使用该技术对支架管腔进行可靠评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d5a/3197262/d9f7aafeb76c/RRP2011-478175.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d5a/3197262/d9f7aafeb76c/RRP2011-478175.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d5a/3197262/d9f7aafeb76c/RRP2011-478175.001.jpg

相似文献

1
MR Angiography of Peripheral Arterial Stents: In Vitro Evaluation of 22 Different Stent Types.外周动脉支架的磁共振血管造影:22种不同支架类型的体外评估
Radiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:478175. doi: 10.1155/2011/478175. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
2
Revealing in-stent stenoses of the iliac arteries: comparison of multidetector CT with MR angiography and digital radiographic angiography in a Phantom model.显示髂动脉支架内狭窄:在体模模型中多排螺旋CT与磁共振血管造影及数字X线血管造影的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Nov;179(5):1319-22. doi: 10.2214/ajr.179.5.1791319.
3
Multislice CT angiography of the iliac arteries in the presence of various stents: in vitro evaluation of artifacts and lumen visibility.存在各种支架情况下髂动脉的多层螺旋CT血管造影:伪影和管腔可视性的体外评估
Invest Radiol. 2001 Dec;36(12):699-704. doi: 10.1097/00004424-200112000-00004.
4
3.0 T vs. 1.5 T MR angiography: in vitro comparison of intravascular stent artifacts.3.0T与1.5T磁共振血管造影:血管内支架伪影的体外比较
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Dec;22(6):772-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20445.
5
Stent appearance at contrast-enhanced MR angiography: in vitro examination with 14 stents.对比增强磁共振血管造影术下支架的表现:14个支架的体外检查
Radiology. 2000 Oct;217(1):173-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.217.1.r00se28173.
6
Dual-Source CT Angiography of Peripheral Arterial Stents: In Vitro Evaluation of 22 Different Stent Types.外周动脉支架的双源CT血管造影:22种不同支架类型的体外评估
Radiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:103873. doi: 10.1155/2011/103873. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
7
64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents.64层多探测器冠状动脉CT血管造影术:68种不同支架的体外评估
Eur Radiol. 2006 Apr;16(4):818-26. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-0062-8. Epub 2005 Dec 7.
8
In vitro evaluation of intravascular stent artifacts in three-dimensional MR angiography.三维磁共振血管造影中血管内支架伪影的体外评估
Invest Radiol. 2001 Apr;36(4):218-24. doi: 10.1097/00004424-200104000-00004.
9
Artifact-free in-stent lumen visualization by standard magnetic resonance angiography using a new metallic magnetic resonance imaging stent.使用新型金属磁共振成像支架通过标准磁共振血管造影实现无伪影的支架内管腔可视化。
Circulation. 2002 Apr 16;105(15):1772-5. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000015852.60212.db.
10
Update on multidetector coronary CT angiography of coronary stents: in vitro evaluation of 29 different stent types with dual-source CT.冠状动脉支架的多排螺旋CT血管造影术进展:采用双源CT对29种不同类型支架进行体外评估
Eur Radiol. 2009 Jan;19(1):42-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1132-5. Epub 2008 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Utility of follow-up ultra-high-resolution CT angiography with model-based iterative reconstruction after flow diverter treatment for cerebral aneurysms.血流导向装置治疗颅内动脉瘤后应用基于模型的迭代重建后随访超高分辨率 CT 血管造影的效用。
Radiol Med. 2023 Oct;128(10):1262-1270. doi: 10.1007/s11547-023-01692-9. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
2
(In)comparability of Carotid Artery Stent Characteristics: A Systematic Review on Assessment and Comparison with Manufacturer Data.颈动脉支架特征的不可比性:评估及与制造商数据比较的系统评价。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 Oct;43(10):1430-1437. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02499-1. Epub 2020 May 14.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Qualitative and quantitative analysis of routinely postprocessed (CLEAR) CE-MRA data sets: are SNR and CNR calculations reliable?常规后处理(CLEAR)对比增强磁共振血管造影(CE-MRA)数据集的定性和定量分析:信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)计算是否可靠?
Acad Radiol. 2008 Sep;15(9):1111-7. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.04.002.
2
3.0 T vs. 1.5 T MR angiography: in vitro comparison of intravascular stent artifacts.3.0T与1.5T磁共振血管造影:血管内支架伪影的体外比较
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Dec;22(6):772-9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20445.
3
In vivo evaluation of patency and in-stent stenoses after implantation of nitinol stents in iliac arteries using MR angiography.
Magnetic resonance imaging of patients with airway stents.
气道支架置入患者的磁共振成像
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Oct;10(10):5939-5945. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.09.132.
4
Emergency Covered Stent Implantation For Rupture Of A Pulmonary Vein After Balloon Angioplasty For Postinterventional Pulmonary Vein Stenosis.介入后肺静脉狭窄球囊血管成形术后肺静脉破裂的急诊覆膜支架植入术
J Atr Fibrillation. 2016 Oct 31;9(3):1418. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1418. eCollection 2016 Oct-Nov.
5
In vitro stent lumen visualisation of various common and newly developed femoral artery stents using MR angiography at 1.5 and 3 tesla.在 1.5T 和 3T 磁共振血管造影下观察各种常见和新型股动脉支架的体外支架管腔显影。
Eur Radiol. 2013 Feb;23(2):588-95. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2625-9. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
使用磁共振血管造影术对髂动脉植入镍钛诺支架后通畅性及支架内狭窄进行体内评估。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Nov;185(5):1282-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.04.1389.
4
Peripheral artery stent visualization and in-stent stenosis analysis in 16-row computed tomography: an in-vitro evaluation.16排计算机断层扫描对周围动脉支架的可视化及支架内狭窄分析:一项体外评估
Eur Radiol. 2005 Nov;15(11):2276-83. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-2797-7. Epub 2005 Jul 14.
5
Sonographic follow-up after visceral artery stenting.
J Ultrasound Med. 2004 Aug;23(8):1057-64. doi: 10.7863/jum.2004.23.8.1057.
6
3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance angiography of endovascular aortic stent grafts: phantom measurements in comparison with 1.5 Tesla.3.0特斯拉磁共振血管造影术对血管内主动脉支架移植物的研究:与1.5特斯拉的体模测量对比
Invest Radiol. 2004 Jul;39(7):413-7. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000129470.63758.c1.
7
Revealing in-stent stenoses of the iliac arteries: comparison of multidetector CT with MR angiography and digital radiographic angiography in a Phantom model.显示髂动脉支架内狭窄:在体模模型中多排螺旋CT与磁共振血管造影及数字X线血管造影的比较
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Nov;179(5):1319-22. doi: 10.2214/ajr.179.5.1791319.
8
Improved in-stent magnetic resonance angiography with high flip angle excitation.采用高翻转角激发的改良血管内磁共振血管造影术。
Invest Radiol. 2001 Nov;36(11):677-81. doi: 10.1097/00004424-200111000-00007.
9
MR imaging of vascular stents: effects of susceptibility, flow, and radiofrequency eddy currents.血管支架的磁共振成像:磁化率、血流及射频涡流的影响
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001 Mar;12(3):365-71. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61918-6.
10
In vitro evaluation of intravascular stent artifacts in three-dimensional MR angiography.三维磁共振血管造影中血管内支架伪影的体外评估
Invest Radiol. 2001 Apr;36(4):218-24. doi: 10.1097/00004424-200104000-00004.