• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大样本儿童和成人药物过敏评估结果。

Results of drug hypersensitivity evaluations in a large group of children and adults.

机构信息

Allergy Department and INSERM U657, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

出版信息

Clin Exp Allergy. 2012 Jan;42(1):123-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03887.x. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03887.x
PMID:22092779
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Proven IgE or T-cell mediated drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) seem less common in children compared with adults. However, this has never been proved by data.

OBJECTIVE

To determine and compare proven DHR prevalence in children and adults.

METHODS

Using the DAHD (Drug Allergy and Hypersensitivity Database) cohort, children with proven DHRs were compared with adults. The international EAACI-ENDA recommendations were followed. Patients were divided into four groups: index reaction and test during childhood (C/C), index reaction at childhood and test at adulthood (C/A), index reactions at childhood and adulthood and test at adulthood (CA/A), index reaction and test at adulthood (A/A).

RESULTS

A total of 3275 patients (67.9% female), comprising a total of 4370 patient-episodes, were evaluated (74.5% belonged to the A/A group). Prevalence of positive tests was 15.2% (95%CI, 14.1-16.2) for all tested classes, 10.6% (8.3-13.0) for C/C, 10.6% (7.5-13.6) for C/A, 22.1% (12.8-31.3) for CA/A and 16.5% (15.2-17.8) for A/A. The prevalence was lower in group C/C compared with groups A/A (P < 0.0001) and CA/A (P = 0.003). It was also lower in group C/A compared with the two latter groups (respectively P = 0.003 and P = 0.005). Significant differences were found for maculopapular exanthemas only, and not for urticaria/angiœdema and anaphylaxis. The difference was mainly observed with β-lactams and not for NSAIDs.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Suspicions of DHRs are less likely to be confirmed in children.

摘要

背景

与成人相比,已证实的免疫球蛋白 E 或 T 细胞介导的药物超敏反应(DHR)在儿童中似乎较少见。然而,这从未被数据证明过。

目的

确定并比较儿童和成人中已证实的 DHR 患病率。

方法

使用 DAHD(药物过敏和超敏反应数据库)队列,将患有已证实的 DHR 的儿童与成人进行比较。遵循国际 EAACI-ENDA 建议。患者分为四组:儿童期的索引反应和测试(C/C)、儿童期的索引反应和成年期的测试(C/A)、儿童期和成年期的索引反应和成年期的测试(CA/A)、索引反应和成年期的测试(A/A)。

结果

共评估了 3275 名患者(67.9%为女性),共 4370 名患者(74.5%属于 A/A 组)。所有测试类别的阳性测试率为 15.2%(95%CI,14.1-16.2),C/C 为 10.6%(8.3-13.0),C/A 为 10.6%(7.5-13.6),CA/A 为 22.1%(12.8-31.3),A/A 为 16.5%(15.2-17.8)。与 A/A 组和 CA/A 组相比,C/C 组的患病率较低(P<0.0001)和 CA/A 组(P=0.003)。与后两组相比,C/A 组的患病率也较低(分别为 P=0.003 和 P=0.005)。仅发现斑丘疹性皮疹有显著差异,而荨麻疹/血管性水肿和过敏反应无差异。差异主要与β-内酰胺类药物有关,而与非甾体抗炎药无关。

结论和临床相关性

儿童中 DHR 的怀疑不太可能得到证实。

相似文献

1
Results of drug hypersensitivity evaluations in a large group of children and adults.大样本儿童和成人药物过敏评估结果。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2012 Jan;42(1):123-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03887.x. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
2
Early presentation with angioedema and urticaria in cross-reactive hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs among young, Asian, atopic children.亚洲特应性体质的年轻儿童对非甾体抗炎药交叉反应性超敏反应中血管性水肿和荨麻疹的早期表现
Pediatrics. 2005 Nov;116(5):e675-80. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0969. Epub 2005 Oct 17.
3
[Analysis of 76 patients with urticaria and angioedema induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in Japan].
Arerugi. 2011 Jun;60(6):699-707.
4
Non-immediate reactions to beta-lactams: diagnostic value of skin testing and drug provocation test.β-内酰胺类药物的非即刻反应:皮肤试验和药物激发试验的诊断价值
Clin Exp Allergy. 2008 May;38(5):822-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.02961.x. Epub 2008 Mar 6.
5
A statement on cefazolin immediate hypersensitivity: data from a large database, and focus on the cross-reactivities.头孢唑林即刻过敏反应声明:来自大型数据库的数据,重点关注交叉反应性。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2011 Nov;41(11):1602-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03846.x. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
6
Risk factors for acetaminophen and nimesulide intolerance in patients with NSAID-induced skin disorders.非甾体抗炎药诱导的皮肤疾病患者对乙酰氨基酚和尼美舒利不耐受的危险因素。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1999 Jun;82(6):554-8. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63166-3.
7
Oral drug challenges in non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced urticaria, angioedema and anaphylaxis.非甾体类抗炎药诱导的荨麻疹、血管性水肿和过敏反应的口服药物挑战。
Intern Med J. 2012 Jun;42(6):665-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02601.x.
8
Value of the clinical history in the diagnosis of urticaria/angioedema induced by NSAIDs with cross-intolerance.临床病史在诊断 NSAIDs 交叉不耐受所致荨麻疹/血管性水肿中的价值。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2013 Jan;43(1):85-91. doi: 10.1111/cea.12013.
9
Immediate Reactions to More Than 1 NSAID Must Not Be Considered Cross-Hypersensitivity Unless Tolerance to ASA Is Verified.除非对阿司匹林的耐受性得到证实,否则对一种以上非甾体抗炎药的即刻反应不应被视为交叉过敏。
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2017;27(1):32-39. doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0080.
10
Frequency of adverse drug reactions in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.系统性红斑狼疮患者药物不良反应的发生率
J Rheumatol. 2003 Mar;30(3):480-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug hypersensitivity reactions in children in clinical practice: A WAO Statement.临床实践中儿童药物过敏反应:世界过敏组织声明
World Allergy Organ J. 2025 Aug 29;18(9):101087. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2025.101087. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Perioperative anaphylaxis in children and first successful cisatracurium desensitization.儿童围手术期过敏反应与首次成功的顺式阿曲库铵脱敏治疗
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2025 Mar;36(3):e70066. doi: 10.1111/pai.70066.
3
Drug allergy.药物过敏
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2025 Jan 22;20(Suppl 3):78. doi: 10.1186/s13223-024-00936-1.
4
An overview of a preliminary multicenter retrospective study on food and drug allergies in Moroccan pediatric population.一项关于摩洛哥儿科人群食物和药物过敏的初步多中心回顾性研究概述。
Pan Afr Med J. 2024 Jan 22;47:24. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2024.47.24.41038. eCollection 2024.
5
How to manage drug-virus interplay underlying skin eruptions in children.如何应对儿童皮疹背后的药物与病毒相互作用。
World Allergy Organ J. 2024 Feb 8;17(3):100877. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100877. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
NSAID Hypersensitivity in the Pediatric Population: Classification and Diagnostic Strategies.儿科人群中的非甾体抗炎药超敏反应:分类与诊断策略
J Asthma Allergy. 2022 Sep 28;15:1383-1399. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S267005. eCollection 2022.
7
Immediate and Delayed Hypersensitivity Reactions to Beta-Lactam Antibiotics.β-内酰胺类抗生素的即刻和迟发性超敏反应。
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2022 Jun;62(3):449-462. doi: 10.1007/s12016-021-08903-z. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
8
β-Lactam Allergy in Children.儿童β-内酰胺类药物过敏
Sisli Etfal Hastan T&#305;p Bul. 2021 Sep 24;55(3):374-381. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2021.24434. eCollection 2021.
9
Viral Infections and Cutaneous Drug-Related Eruptions.病毒感染与皮肤药物相关疹
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Mar 10;11:586407. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.586407. eCollection 2020.
10
Drug Allergy Profile From a National Drug Allergy Registry.来自国家药物过敏登记处的药物过敏概况
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jan 8;11:555666. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.555666. eCollection 2020.