Suppr超能文献

基于图谱的与基于个体的多发性硬化症患者胼胝体纤维束追踪:可靠性和临床相关性。

Atlas-based versus individual-based fiber tracking of the corpus callosum in patients with multiple sclerosis: reliability and clinical correlations.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Neuroimaging. 2012 Oct;22(4):355-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2011.00650.x. Epub 2011 Sep 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In multiple sclerosis (MS), the presence of lesions and normal-appearing white matter damage may affect the reliability of diffusion tensor (DT) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based tractography. We compared the performance of an individual-based method for corpus callosum (CC) fiber tracking in MS with those of two atlas-based methods.

METHODS

Brain DT MRI scans were acquired from 35 patients with MS and 18 age-matched healthy volunteers (HV). DT-derived metrics from the CC-the mean diffusivity (MD) and fractional anisotropy (FA)-were calculated using an individual-based and two atlas-based methods with different types of subject registration (linear and nonlinear) to a CC atlas. Customized termination criteria were applied to stop the tracking algorithm when using the individual-based method.

RESULTS

All the methods were able to distinguish between MS patients and HV. Using the individual-based method, stronger relationships were found between CC DT-derived metrics and the subjects' clinical condition.

CONCLUSION

CC DT tractography using an individual-based method is more sensitive than the atlas-based ones to tract-specific alterations related to MS disability. An atlas-based method with nonlinear registration can be a valid alternative when an automated postprocessing is warranted, such as in the case of high volumes of data.

摘要

背景与目的

在多发性硬化症(MS)中,病灶和正常表现的白质损伤的存在可能会影响基于弥散张量(DT)磁共振成像(MRI)的束追踪的可靠性。我们比较了基于个体的胼胝体(CC)纤维追踪方法与两种基于图谱的方法在 MS 中的性能。

方法

对 35 例 MS 患者和 18 名年龄匹配的健康志愿者(HV)进行脑 DT MRI 扫描。使用基于个体和两种基于图谱的方法,分别使用线性和非线性的主体注册方式,对 CC 图谱进行 CC 内的平均弥散度(MD)和各向异性分数(FA)等 DT 衍生指标的计算。在使用基于个体的方法时,使用定制的终止标准来停止追踪算法。

结果

所有方法均能区分 MS 患者和 HV。使用基于个体的方法,CC 的 DT 衍生指标与患者的临床状况之间存在更强的相关性。

结论

与基于图谱的方法相比,使用基于个体的方法进行 CC DT 束追踪对与 MS 残疾相关的特定束变化更敏感。在需要自动后处理的情况下(例如在数据量较大的情况下),非线性注册的基于图谱的方法可能是一种有效的替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验