• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健领域的大规模改进举措:文献综述

Large-scale improvement initiatives in healthcare: a scan of the literature.

作者信息

Perla Rocco J, Bradbury Elizabeth, Gunther-Murphy Christina

机构信息

Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, USA.

出版信息

J Healthc Qual. 2013 Jan-Feb;35(1):30-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2011.00164.x. Epub 2011 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1111/j.1945-1474.2011.00164.x
PMID:22093021
Abstract

CONTEXT

The goal of this article is to provide a succinct scan of the literature as it relates to the current thinking and practice in large-scale improvement initiatives in healthcare.

METHOD

We employed a scan of the literature using a modified Delphi technique. A standard review form was used. The scan was limited to large-scale spread efforts in hospitals and healthcare systems. Each of the main factors that emerged during the scan was linked to secondary factors and organized using a driver diagram.

FINDINGS

Four primary drivers (factors) emerged during our scan that inform large-scale change initiatives in healthcare: Planning and Infrastructure; Individual, Group, Organizational, and System Factors; The Process of Change; and Performance Measures and Evaluation.

CONCLUSION

Our scan identified a tremendous amount of work being done around the world to improve healthcare. In general, our findings suggest these initiatives tend to be fragmented from an implementation standpoint. We identified primary and secondary drivers (factors) that can be used by those responsible for implementing large-scale improvement initiatives both at a strategy level and in their daily work. These drivers could serve as a "checklist" of ideas to consider in different testing and implementation situations.

摘要

背景

本文的目的是简要梳理与医疗保健领域大规模改进举措的当前思路和实践相关的文献。

方法

我们采用了一种经过改进的德尔菲技术对文献进行梳理。使用了标准的综述表格。梳理工作局限于医院和医疗保健系统中的大规模推广工作。梳理过程中出现的每个主要因素都与次要因素相关联,并使用驱动因素图进行组织。

结果

在我们的梳理过程中出现了四个主要驱动因素,这些因素为医疗保健领域的大规模变革举措提供了依据:规划与基础设施;个人、群体、组织和系统因素;变革过程;以及绩效衡量与评估。

结论

我们的梳理发现世界各地正在开展大量改善医疗保健的工作。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,从实施角度来看,这些举措往往是零散的。我们确定了主要和次要驱动因素,负责实施大规模改进举措的人员在战略层面及其日常工作中都可以使用这些因素。这些驱动因素可作为在不同测试和实施情况下需要考虑的想法的“清单”。

相似文献

1
Large-scale improvement initiatives in healthcare: a scan of the literature.医疗保健领域的大规模改进举措:文献综述
J Healthc Qual. 2013 Jan-Feb;35(1):30-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2011.00164.x. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
2
Success factors for strategic change initiatives: a qualitative study of healthcare administrators' perspectives.战略变革举措的成功因素:一项对医疗保健管理人员观点的定性研究。
J Healthc Manag. 2014 Jan-Feb;59(1):65-81.
3
System-level quality improvement initiatives: lessons from Keystone and other large-scale projects.系统层面的质量改进措施:基石项目和其他大型项目的经验教训。
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Aug;33(4):370-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1322400. Epub 2012 Aug 8.
4
What initiatives do healthcare leaders agree are needed for healthcare system improvement? Results of a modified-Delphi study.医疗保健领导者认为医疗保健系统改进需要哪些举措?一项改良德尔菲研究的结果。
J Health Organ Manag. 2018 Nov 19;32(8):1002-1012. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-08-2017-0216. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
5
Implementing quality initiatives in healthcare organizations: drivers and challenges.在医疗保健组织中实施质量改进措施:驱动因素与挑战
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2014;27(3):166-81. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-05-2012-0047.
6
[Chronic diseases: towards a change of the healthcare paradigm].[慢性病:迈向医疗保健范式的转变]
Sante Publique. 2015 Jan-Feb;27(1 Suppl):S9-11.
7
Development and Validation of the CPO Scale, a New Instrument for Evaluation of Health Care Improvement Efforts.CPO量表的开发与验证:一种评估医疗保健改进工作的新工具。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2015 Jul-Sep;24(3):109-20. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000065.
8
Accelerating quality improvement within your organization: Applying the Model for Improvement.加速组织内部的质量改进:应用改进模型。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2015 Jul-Aug;55(4):e364-74; quiz e375-6. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2015.15533.
9
Learn to Change: Teaching Toward a Shifting Health Care Horizon.学会改变:面向不断变化的医疗保健前景开展教学。
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2016 Summer;36 Suppl 1:S14-5. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000087.
10
Innovation to improve health care provision and health systems in sub-Saharan Africa - promoting agency in mid-level workers and district managers.创新以改善撒哈拉以南非洲的医疗服务提供和卫生系统 - 促进中层工作人员和地区经理的能动性。
Glob Public Health. 2011;6(6):657-68. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2010.489905. Epub 2011 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging intermediaries' skillsets to build implementation research and practice infrastructure: a qualitative case study.利用中介机构的技能来构建实施研究与实践基础设施:一项定性案例研究。
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Aug 2;6(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00765-2.
2
What has the appraisal for hospitals brought to job satisfaction of healthcare professionals? A cross-sectional survey in China.医院评鉴对医疗专业人员工作满意度有何影响?一项中国的横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 29;14(8):e079285. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079285.
3
Key elements and contextual factors that influence successful implementation of large-system transformation initiatives in the New Zealand health system: a realist evaluation.
影响新西兰卫生系统中大型系统转型计划成功实施的关键要素和背景因素:一项现实主义评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 10;24(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10497-5.
4
Health System-Level Barriers to Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: Protocol for a Comparative Case Study Analysis.活体供肾移植的卫生系统层面障碍:一项比较案例研究分析的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Mar 7;12:e44172. doi: 10.2196/44172.
5
Continuous quality improvement at the frontline: One interdisciplinary clinical team's four-year journey after completing a virtual learning program.一线的持续质量改进:一个跨学科临床团队在完成虚拟学习项目后的四年历程。
Learn Health Syst. 2022 Sep 27;6(4):e10345. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10345. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
Tools for assessing the scalability of innovations in health: a systematic review.评估卫生创新可扩展性的工具:系统评价。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Mar 24;20(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00830-5.
7
Evaluation of a -inspired symposium to spread primary health care innovations in Quebec, Canada: a mixed-methods study using quality-improvement e-surveys.评估一项在加拿大魁北克传播初级卫生保健创新的 - 启发式研讨会:使用质量改进电子调查的混合方法研究。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Mar 22;10(1):E247-E254. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200251. Print 2022 Jan-Mar.
8
The Implementation of National Dementia Plans: A Multiple-Case Study on Denmark, Germany, and Italy.《国家痴呆症计划的实施:丹麦、德国和意大利的多案例研究》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 28;18(19):10220. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910220.
9
Understanding the implementation of evidence-informed policies and practices from a policy perspective: a critical interpretive synthesis.从政策角度理解循证政策和实践的实施:批判性综合分析。
Implement Sci. 2021 Feb 15;16(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01082-7.
10
Sustainable waiting time reductions after introducing the STAT model for access and triage: 12-month follow up of a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial.引入 STAT 就诊通道和分诊模型后可持续减少等候时间:一项阶梯式楔形群随机对照试验的 12 个月随访结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 21;20(1):968. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05824-z.