• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响新西兰卫生系统中大型系统转型计划成功实施的关键要素和背景因素:一项现实主义评价。

Key elements and contextual factors that influence successful implementation of large-system transformation initiatives in the New Zealand health system: a realist evaluation.

机构信息

Te Tai Ōhanga- The Treasury, 1 The Terrace, 6011, Wellington, New Zealand.

Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, 34 Princes Street, Auckland CBD, 1010, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 10;24(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10497-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-023-10497-5
PMID:38200522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10782523/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite three decades of policy initiatives to improve integration of health care, delivery of health care in New Zealand remains fragmented, and health inequities persist for Māori and other high priority populations. An evidence base is needed to increase the chances of success with implementation of large-system transformation (LST) initiatives in a complex adaptive system.

METHODS

This research aimed to identify key elements that support implementation of LST initiatives, and to investigate contextual factors that influence these initiatives. The realist logic of enquiry, nested within the macro framing of complex adaptive systems, formed the overall methodology for this research and involved five phases: theory gleaning from a local LST initiative, literature review, interviews, workshop, and online survey. NVivo software programme was used for thematic analysis of the interview, workshop, and the survey data. We identified key elements and explained variations in success (outcomes) by identifying mechanisms triggered by various contexts in which LST initiatives are implemented.

RESULTS

The research found that a set of 10 key elements need to be present in the New Zealand health system to increase chances of success with implementation of LST initiatives. These are: (i) an alliancing way of working; (ii) a commitment to te Tiriti o Waitangi; (iii) an understanding of equity; (iv) clinical leadership and involvement; (v) involved people, whānau, and community; (vi) intelligent commissioning; (vii) continuous improvement; (viii) integrated health information; (ix) analytic capability; and (x) dedicated resources and time. The research identified five contextual factors that influenced implementation of LST initiatives: a history of working together, distributed leadership from funders, the maturity of Alliances, capacity and capability for improvement, and a continuous improvement culture. The research found that the key mechanism of trust is built and nurtured over time through sharing of power by senior health leaders by practising distributed leadership, which then creates a positive history of working together and increases the maturity of Alliances.

DISCUSSION

Two authors (KMS and PBJ) led the development and implementation of the local LST initiative. This prior knowledge and experience provided a unique perspective to the research but also created a conflict of interest and introduced potential bias, these were managed through a wide range of data collection methods and informed consent from participants. The evidence-base for successful implementation of LST initiatives produced in this research contains knowledge and experience of senior system leaders who are often in charge of leading these initiatives. This evidence base enables decision makers to make sense of complex processes involved in the successful implementation of LST initiatives.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of informal trust-based networks provided a critical platform for successful implementation of LST initiatives in the New Zealand health system. Maturity of these networks relies on building and sustaining high-trust relationships among the network members. The role of local and central agencies and the government is to provide the policy settings and conditions in which trust-based networks can flourish.

OTHER

This study was approved by the Victoria University of Wellington Human Ethics Committee (Ethics Approval Number 27,356). The research was supported by the Victoria University of Wellington research grant (222,809) and from the University of Auckland Department of Medicine research fund (H10779).

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3484/10782523/524a742c6c4c/12913_2023_10497_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3484/10782523/524a742c6c4c/12913_2023_10497_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3484/10782523/524a742c6c4c/12913_2023_10497_Fig1_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

尽管三十年来一直在推行政策以改善医疗保健的整合,但新西兰的医疗保健服务仍然分散,毛利人和其他高优先级人群的健康不平等现象仍然存在。需要有一个证据基础,以增加在复杂适应系统中实施大型系统转型(LST)计划成功的机会。

方法

本研究旨在确定支持 LST 计划实施的关键要素,并研究影响这些计划的背景因素。探索性询问的现实主义逻辑,嵌套在复杂适应系统的宏观框架内,构成了这项研究的总体方法,包括五个阶段:从当地 LST 计划中汲取理论、文献综述、访谈、研讨会和在线调查。使用 NVivo 软件程序对访谈、研讨会和调查数据进行主题分析。我们确定了关键要素,并通过识别 LST 计划实施的各种背景下触发的机制,解释了成功(结果)的变化。

结果

研究发现,新西兰卫生系统需要具备 10 个关键要素,才能增加 LST 计划实施成功的机会。这些要素是:(i)结盟的工作方式;(ii)对《怀唐伊条约》的承诺;(iii)对公平的理解;(iv)临床领导力和参与;(v)相关人员、家庭和社区;(vi)明智的委托;(vii)持续改进;(viii)综合健康信息;(ix)分析能力;和(x)专用资源和时间。研究确定了影响 LST 计划实施的五个背景因素:共同工作的历史、资金提供者的分布式领导力、联盟的成熟度、改进的能力和能力,以及持续改进的文化。研究发现,信任的关键机制是通过高级卫生领导人通过实践分布式领导力来分享权力,随着时间的推移建立和培养的,这继而创造了共同工作的积极历史,并提高了联盟的成熟度。

讨论

两位作者(KMS 和 PBJ)领导了当地 LST 计划的制定和实施。这种先前的知识和经验为研究提供了独特的视角,但也带来了利益冲突和潜在的偏见,这些通过广泛的数据分析方法和参与者的知情同意得到了管理。本研究产生的成功实施 LST 计划的循证依据包含了负责领导这些计划的系统高级领导人的知识和经验。这个证据基础使决策者能够理解成功实施 LST 计划所涉及的复杂过程。

结论

在新西兰卫生系统中,使用基于非正式信任的网络为 LST 计划的成功实施提供了一个关键平台。这些网络的成熟度取决于网络成员之间建立和维持高信任关系。地方和中央机构以及政府的作用是提供政策环境和条件,使基于信任的网络能够蓬勃发展。

其他

本研究已获得惠灵顿维多利亚大学人类伦理委员会的批准(伦理批准号 27,356)。该研究得到了惠灵顿维多利亚大学研究基金(222,809 美元)和奥克兰大学医学系研究基金(H10779)的支持。

相似文献

1
Key elements and contextual factors that influence successful implementation of large-system transformation initiatives in the New Zealand health system: a realist evaluation.影响新西兰卫生系统中大型系统转型计划成功实施的关键要素和背景因素:一项现实主义评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 10;24(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10497-5.
2
A self-assessment maturity matrix to support large-scale change using collaborative networks in the New Zealand health system.支持新西兰卫生系统中使用协作网络进行大规模变革的自我评估成熟度矩阵。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 24;24(1):838. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11284-6.
3
Large-system transformation in health care: a realist review.医疗保健中的大系统转型:一个现实主义的综述。
Milbank Q. 2012 Sep;90(3):421-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2012.00670.x.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
6
How did New Zealand's regional District Health Board groupings work to improve service integration and health outcomes: a realist evaluation.新西兰地区卫生委员会如何努力改善服务整合和健康结果:一个实际评估。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 11;13(12):e079268. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079268.
7
Lessons learnt from the implementation of new models of care delivery through alliance governance in the Southern health region of New Zealand: a qualitative study.通过联盟治理在新西兰南部卫生区域实施新的护理提供模式的经验教训:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 31;12(10):e065635. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065635.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
10
Explanation of context, mechanisms and outcomes in adult community mental health crisis care: the MH-CREST realist evidence synthesis.成人社区心理健康危机护理中的背景、机制和结果解释:MH-CREST 真实证据综合研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;11(15):1-161. doi: 10.3310/TWKK5110.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging intermediaries' skillsets to build implementation research and practice infrastructure: a qualitative case study.利用中介机构的技能来构建实施研究与实践基础设施:一项定性案例研究。
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Aug 2;6(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00765-2.
2
A self-assessment maturity matrix to support large-scale change using collaborative networks in the New Zealand health system.支持新西兰卫生系统中使用协作网络进行大规模变革的自我评估成熟度矩阵。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 24;24(1):838. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11284-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Why do some inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work when others do not? A realist review.为什么有些医疗保健领域的组织间合作能够成功,而有些则不能?一项现实主义综述。
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 22;10(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01630-8.
2
Strengthening prevention in communities through systems change: lessons from the evaluation of Healthy Families NZ.通过系统变革加强社区预防:新西兰健康家庭评估的经验教训。
Health Promot Int. 2020 Oct 1;35(5):947-957. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daz092.
3
New Zealand health system: universalism struggles with persisting inequities.
新西兰医疗体系:全民医保与持续存在的不平等现象作斗争。
Lancet. 2019 Aug 3;394(10196):432-442. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31238-3.
4
The contribution of avoidable mortality to the life expectancy gap in Māori and Pacific populations in New Zealand-a decomposition analysis.可避免死亡率对新西兰毛利人和太平洋岛民人口预期寿命差距的影响——一项分解分析。
N Z Med J. 2019 Mar 29;132(1492):46-60.
5
Mechanisms, contexts and points of contention: operationalizing realist-informed research for complex health interventions.机制、背景和争议点:为复杂健康干预措施实施基于现实主义的研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Dec 27;18(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0641-4.
6
The application of triple aim framework in the context of primary healthcare: A systematic literature review.三重目标框架在基层医疗中的应用:系统文献回顾。
Health Policy. 2018 Aug;122(8):900-907. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
7
Changing how we think about healthcare improvement.改变我们对医疗保健改善的看法。
BMJ. 2018 May 17;361:k2014. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2014.
8
Do different approaches to clinical governance development and implementation make a difference? Findings from Ireland and New Zealand.不同的临床治理发展和实施方法是否有区别?来自爱尔兰和新西兰的发现。
J Health Organ Manag. 2017 Oct 9;31(7-8):682-695. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-04-2017-0069.
9
Organizational Context and Capabilities for Integrating Care: A Framework for Improvement.整合医疗的组织背景与能力:改进框架
Int J Integr Care. 2016 Aug 31;16(3):15. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2416.
10
Sustaining organizational culture change in health systems.维持卫生系统中的组织文化变革。
J Health Organ Manag. 2016;30(1):2-30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-07-2014-0117.