• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为持续提高内窥镜标准而努力:结肠镜检查评估表的验证。

Towards continuous improvement of endoscopy standards: validation of a colonoscopy assessment form.

机构信息

National Surgical Training Centre, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2012 Sep;14(9):1126-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02883.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02883.x
PMID:22093083
Abstract

AIM

The assessment of procedural colonoscopy skills is important and topical. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a competency-based colonoscopy assessment form that would be easy to use, suitable for the assessment of junior and senior endoscopists and potentially a useful instrument to detect differences in performance standards following different training interventions.

METHOD

A standardized assessment form was developed incorporating a checklist with dichotomous yes/no responses and a global assessment section incorporating several different elements. This form was used prospectively to evaluate colonoscopy cases during the period of the study in several university teaching hospitals. Results were analysed using ANOVA with Bonferroni corrections for post hoc analysis.

RESULTS

Eighty-one procedures were assessed, performed by eight consultant and 19 trainee endoscopists. There were no serious errors. When divided into three groups based on previous experience (novice, intermediate and expert) the assessment form demonstrated statistically significant differences between all three groups (P<0.05). When separate elements were taken into account, the global assessment section was a better discriminator of skill level than the checklist.

CONCLUSION

This form is a valid, easy-to-use assessment method. We intend to use it to assess the value of simulator training in trainee endoscopists. It also has the potential to be a useful training tool when feedback is given to the trainee.

摘要

目的

评估结肠镜检查技术非常重要且具有现实意义。本研究旨在开发并验证一种基于能力的结肠镜检查评估表,该评估表易于使用,适用于评估初级和高级内镜医生,并且可能是一种有用的工具,可用于检测不同培训干预措施后绩效标准的差异。

方法

采用包含二项式“是/否”回答的检查表和包含几个不同要素的整体评估部分,制定了标准化评估表。该评估表在几个大学教学医院的研究期间前瞻性地用于评估结肠镜检查病例。使用方差分析(ANOVA)和事后 Bonferroni 校正进行结果分析。

结果

评估了 81 例由 8 名顾问和 19 名受训内镜医生进行的操作。没有严重错误。根据先前的经验(新手、中级和专家)将参与者分为三组,评估表显示三组之间存在统计学差异(P<0.05)。当分别考虑各个要素时,整体评估部分比检查表更能区分技能水平。

结论

该评估表是一种有效且易于使用的评估方法。我们打算用它来评估模拟器培训对受训内镜医生的价值。当向受训者提供反馈时,它也有可能成为一种有用的培训工具。

相似文献

1
Towards continuous improvement of endoscopy standards: validation of a colonoscopy assessment form.为持续提高内窥镜标准而努力:结肠镜检查评估表的验证。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Sep;14(9):1126-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02883.x.
2
Training and transfer of colonoscopy skills: a multinational, randomized, blinded, controlled trial of simulator versus bedside training.结肠镜检查技能的培训和转移:一项关于模拟器与床旁培训的多国、随机、盲法、对照试验。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Feb;71(2):298-307. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.07.017. Epub 2009 Nov 3.
3
The gastrointestinal endoscopy competency assessment tool for pediatric colonoscopy.儿童结肠镜检查的胃肠道内镜检查能力评估工具
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015 Apr;60(4):474-80. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000686.
4
Validation of the second-generation Olympus colonoscopy simulator for skills assessment.第二代奥林巴斯结肠镜模拟器的技能评估验证。
Endoscopy. 2009 Nov;41(11):952-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1215193. Epub 2009 Oct 2.
5
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Competency Assessment Tool: reliability and validity evidence.胃肠道内镜能力评估工具:可靠性和有效性证据。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(6):1417-1424.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.11.030. Epub 2015 Mar 7.
6
Procedural performance in gastrointestinal endoscopy: an assessment and self-appraisal tool.胃肠内镜检查中的操作表现:一种评估与自我评估工具。
Am J Surg. 2008 Sep;196(3):450-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.10.024. Epub 2008 Jun 30.
7
Construct validation of a physical model colonoscopy simulator.构建物理模型结肠镜模拟器的验证。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jul;76(1):144-50. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.03.246.
8
Validation of a novel method for assessing competency in polypectomy.验证一种评估息肉切除术能力的新方法。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Mar;75(3):568-75. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.028. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
9
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Competency Assessment Tool: development of a procedure-specific assessment tool for colonoscopy.胃肠道内镜能力评估工具:结肠镜检查专用评估工具的开发。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 May;79(5):798-807.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.10.035. Epub 2013 Dec 8.
10
Evaluation of hands-on training in colonoscopy: is a computer-based simulator useful?结肠镜检查操作培训评估:基于计算机的模拟器是否有用?
Dig Liver Dis. 2012 Jul;44(7):580-4. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2012.03.014. Epub 2012 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Peer evaluation and feedback for invasive medical procedures: a systematic review.同行评议和反馈在有创医疗操作中的应用:系统综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jul 29;22(1):581. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03652-9.
2
Detecting Task Difficulty of Learners in Colonoscopy: Evidence from Eye-Tracking.结肠镜检查中学习者任务难度的检测:来自眼动追踪的证据
J Eye Mov Res. 2021 Jul 13;14(2). doi: 10.16910/jemr.14.2.5. eCollection 2021.