Guillausseau P J, Charles M A, Paolaggi F, Timsit J, Chanson P, Peynet J, Godard V, Eschwege E, Rousselet F, Lubetzki J
Department of Internal Medicine, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France.
Diabetes Care. 1990 Aug;13(8):898-900. doi: 10.2337/diacare.13.8.898.
Total glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1) and fructosamine were evaluated as screening tools for detection of glucose-tolerance abnormalities in 144 asymptomatic subjects undergoing a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test. Subjects were classified according to World Health Organization criteria as having normal (n = 78), impaired (n = 40), or diabetic (n = 26) glucose tolerance. We found good specificity for HbA1 and fructosamine (100 and 97%, respectively) but low sensitivity (15 and 19%, respectively). At the intersection of the curves of sensitivity and specificity drawn from various thresholds of normality, both sensitivity and specificity were 75% for HbA1 and 55% for fructosamine. Thus, neither HbA1 nor fructosamine seems to be suitable for the diagnosis of mild abnormalities in glucose tolerance.
对144名接受75克口服葡萄糖耐量试验的无症状受试者,评估了总糖化血红蛋白(HbA1)和果糖胺作为检测糖耐量异常的筛查工具。根据世界卫生组织标准,将受试者分为糖耐量正常(n = 78)、糖耐量受损(n = 40)或糖尿病(n = 26)。我们发现HbA1和果糖胺具有良好的特异性(分别为100%和97%),但敏感性较低(分别为15%和19%)。在根据不同正常阈值绘制的敏感性和特异性曲线的交叉点,HbA1的敏感性和特异性均为75%,果糖胺为55%。因此,HbA1和果糖胺似乎都不适合用于诊断轻度糖耐量异常。