Faculty of Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Sciences, Research Centre for Adapted Physical Activity and Psychomotor Rehabilitation, Catholic University of Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium.
Res Dev Disabil. 2012 Jan-Feb;33(1):196-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.08.033. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
The study was designed to investigate the discriminant validity of the Motor Behavior Checklist (MBC) for distinguishing four group of children independently classified with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, (ADHD; N=22), Conduct Disorder (CD; N=17), Learning Disabilities (LD; N=24) and Autistic Spectrum Disorders (ASD; N=20). Physical education teachers used the MBC for children to rate their pupils based on their motor related behaviors. A multivariate analysis revealed significant differences among the groups on different problem scales. The results indicated that the MBC for children may be effective in discriminating children with similar disruptive behaviors (e.g., ADHD, CD) and autistic disorders, based on their motor behavior characteristics, but not children with Learning Disabilities (LD), when used by physical education teachers in school settings.
本研究旨在探讨运动行为检查表（MBC）在区分以下四个群体方面的判别效度：注意力缺陷/多动障碍（ADHD；N=22）、品行障碍（CD；N=17）、学习障碍（LD；N=24）和自闭症谱系障碍（ASD；N=20）。体育教师使用 MBC 对儿童进行评分，依据的是他们与运动相关的行为。多变量分析显示，各组在不同问题量表上存在显著差异。结果表明，体育教师在学校环境中使用 MBC 可能可以有效区分具有类似破坏性行为（如 ADHD、CD）和自闭症障碍的儿童，但不能区分具有学习障碍（LD）的儿童，依据是他们的运动行为特征。
