Suppr超能文献

多中心 II 期随机试验:多西他赛/吉西他滨对比多西他赛/卡培他滨一线治疗晚期乳腺癌:意大利南部肿瘤学组研究。

A multicenter phase II randomized trial of docetaxel/gemcitabine versus docetaxel/capecitabine as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer: a Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale study.

机构信息

Division of Medical Oncology B, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Oncology. 2011;81(3-4):230-6. doi: 10.1159/000334432. Epub 2011 Nov 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate two docetaxel-based regimens as first-line treatment in advanced breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to docetaxel/gemcitabine (arm A: docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8) or docetaxel/capecitabine (arm B: docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, capecitabine 1,250 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14); both chemotherapy regimens were repeated every 21 days. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the response rate.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients were enrolled (36 each in arms A and B). Responses according to intention-to-treat analysis were as follows: arm A, 41.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 25.6-57.8]; arm B, 38.9% (95% CI 23-54.8). Median progression-free survival was 10.9 months (95% CI 8.1-13.7) in arm A and 10 months (95% CI 8.8-11.2) in arm B. Overall survival was 26 months (95% CI 22.0-30.0) in arm A and 28 months (95% CI 23.4-32.6) in arm B. Both treatments were well tolerated; myelosuppression was the dose-limiting toxicity, with grade 3-4 neutropenia in 13.8 and 19.4% of the patients in arms A and B, respectively. No relevant differences in other toxicities were observed in the two arms, except for diarrhea (13.9%) and hand-foot syndrome (11.1%), which occurred only in arm B.

CONCLUSIONS

Both regimens were active and well tolerated in advanced breast cancer.

摘要

目的

评估两种多西紫杉醇为基础的方案作为晚期乳腺癌患者的一线治疗。

方法

患者随机分配至多西紫杉醇/吉西他滨组(A 组:多西紫杉醇 75mg/m²,第 1 天;吉西他滨 1000mg/m²,第 1 天和第 8 天)或多西紫杉醇/卡培他滨组(B 组:多西紫杉醇 75mg/m²,第 1 天;卡培他滨 1250mg/m²,每天 2 次,第 1-14 天);两种化疗方案均每 21 天重复。研究的主要目的是评估反应率。

结果

共纳入 72 例患者(A 组和 B 组各 36 例)。根据意向治疗分析的结果如下:A 组,41.7%[95%置信区间(CI)25.6-57.8];B 组,38.9%(95%CI 23-54.8)。A 组无进展生存期的中位数为 10.9 个月(95%CI 8.1-13.7),B 组为 10 个月(95%CI 8.8-11.2)。A 组总生存期为 26 个月(95%CI 22.0-30.0),B 组为 28 个月(95%CI 23.4-32.6)。两种治疗均耐受良好;骨髓抑制是剂量限制毒性,A 组和 B 组分别有 13.8%和 19.4%的患者出现 3-4 级中性粒细胞减少症。除腹泻(13.9%)和手足综合征(11.1%)仅在 B 组发生外,两组之间未见其他毒性的相关差异。

结论

两种方案在晚期乳腺癌中均具有活性且耐受良好。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验