Suppr超能文献

基于吉西他滨的化疗作为晚期乳腺癌患者治疗的可行选择:一项荟萃分析与文献综述

Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy as a viable option for treatment of advanced breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis and literature review.

作者信息

Xie Zhibo, Zhang Yifan, Jin Chen, Fu Deliang

机构信息

Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Institute, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200011, China.

出版信息

Oncotarget. 2017 Dec 19;9(6):7148-7161. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23426. eCollection 2018 Jan 23.

Abstract

This meta-analysis was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-based regimens for the treatment advanced breast cancer (ABC). Altogether 15 studies involving 8195 ABC patients were retrieved for analysis. Compared with non-gemcitabine-based chemotherapies, patients receiving gemcitabine-based therapy exhibited better overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) (HR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.19; HR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.30; HR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.24). Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was significantly high but manageable in gemcitabine-based groups. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy had better OS (HR = 1.19, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.32), PFS (HR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.27), and ORR (RR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.32). In addition, additional gemcitabine chemotherapy also showed better OS (HR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.30), PFS (HR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.30) and ORR (RR = 1.23, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.42) than gemcitabine replacement therapy. Furthermore, patients receiving gemcitabine-taxanes-based regimens had better OS (HR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.28), PFS (HR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.20) and ORR (RR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.35) than patients with non-gemcitabine-taxanes-based chemotherapy. These findings indicate that gemcitabine combination regimens could serve as a promising regimen for ABC patients, though increased hematologic toxicity should be considered with caution.

摘要

本荟萃分析旨在比较以吉西他滨为基础的方案治疗晚期乳腺癌(ABC)的疗效和安全性。共检索到15项研究,涉及8195例ABC患者并进行分析。与非吉西他滨为基础的化疗相比,接受吉西他滨为基础治疗的患者总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和客观缓解率(ORR)更佳(HR = 1.12,95%CI 1.05至1.19;HR = 1.16,95%CI 1.03至1.30;HR = 1.14,95%CI 1.04至1.24)。3/4级血液学毒性在以吉西他滨为基础的组中显著更高,但可控制。亚组分析显示,接受一线吉西他滨为基础化疗的患者OS更佳(HR = 1.19,95%CI 1.07至1.32)、PFS更佳(HR = 1.17,95%CI 1.08至1.27)以及ORR更佳(RR = 1.16,95%CI 1.02至1.32)。此外,额外的吉西他滨化疗与吉西他滨替代疗法相比,OS(HR = 1.17,95%CI 1.06至1.30)、PFS(HR = 1.20,95%CI 1.11至1.30)和ORR(RR = 1.23,95%CI 1.06至1.42)也更好。此外,接受吉西他滨 - 紫杉烷类方案的患者与非吉西他滨 - 紫杉烷类化疗的患者相比,OS(HR = 1.17,95%CI 1.06至1.28)、PFS(HR = 1.12,95%CI 1.04至1.20)和ORR(RR = 1.17,95%CI 1.01至1.35)更佳。这些发现表明,吉西他滨联合方案可能是ABC患者的一种有前景的方案,不过应谨慎考虑血液学毒性增加的问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a8e/5805543/f8341a8e725f/oncotarget-09-7148-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验