Department of Clinical Psychology and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Nov;72(11):1102-9. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.1516.
Current guidelines recommend treating severe depression with pharmacotherapy. Randomized clinical trials as well as traditional meta-analyses have considerable limitations in testing for moderators of treatment outcomes.
To conduct a systematic literature search, collect primary data from trials, and analyze baseline depression severity as a moderator of treatment outcomes between cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and antidepressant medication (ADM).
A total of 14 902 abstracts were examined from a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and Cochrane Registry of Controlled Trials from 1966 to January 1, 2014.
Randomized clinical trials in which CBT and ADM were compared in patients with a DSM-defined depressive disorder were included.
Study authors were asked to provide primary data from their trial. Primary data from 16 of 24 identified trials (67%), with 1700 outpatients (794 from the CBT condition and 906 from the ADM condition), were included. Missing data were imputed with multiple imputation methods. Mixed-effects models adjusting for study-level differences were used to examine baseline depression severity as a moderator of treatment outcomes.
Seventeen-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).
There was a main effect of ADM over CBT on the HAM-D (β = -0.88; P = .03) and a nonsignificant trend on the BDI (β = -1.14; P = .08, statistical test for trend), but no significant differences in response (odds ratio [OR], 1.24; P = .12) or remission (OR, 1.18; P = .22). Mixed-effects models using the HAM-D indicated that baseline depression severity does not moderate reductions in depressive symptoms between CBT and ADM at outcome (β = 0.00; P = .96). Similar results were seen using the BDI. Baseline depression severity also did not moderate the likelihood of response (OR, 0.99; P = .77) or remission (OR, 1.00; P = .93) between CBT and ADM.
Baseline depression severity did not moderate differences between CBT and ADM on the HAM-D or BDI or in response or remission. This finding cannot be extrapolated to other psychotherapies, to individual ADMs, or to inpatients. However, it offers new and substantial evidence that is of relevance to researchers, physicians and therapists, and patients.
目前的指南建议使用药物治疗严重的抑郁症。随机临床试验以及传统的荟萃分析在检测治疗结果的调节剂方面存在相当大的局限性。
进行系统文献检索,从试验中收集原始数据,并分析基线抑郁严重程度作为认知行为疗法(CBT)和抗抑郁药(ADM)治疗结果之间的调节剂。
从 1966 年至 2014 年 1 月 1 日,在 PubMed、PsycINFO、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 对照试验注册中心进行了全面文献检索,共检查了 14902 篇摘要。
纳入了将 CBT 和 ADM 与 DSM 定义的抑郁障碍患者进行比较的随机临床试验。
要求研究作者提供其试验的原始数据。来自 24 项确定试验中的 16 项(67%)的主要数据,其中包括 1700 名门诊患者(CBT 组 794 名,ADM 组 906 名)。使用多种插补方法对缺失数据进行插补。使用调整研究水平差异的混合效应模型来检查基线抑郁严重程度作为治疗结果的调节剂。
17 项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)和贝克抑郁量表(BDI)。
ADM 在 HAM-D 上优于 CBT(β=-0.88;P=0.03),BDI 上有不显著的趋势(β=-1.14;P=0.08,趋势检验),但反应(优势比[OR],1.24;P=0.12)或缓解(OR,1.18;P=0.22)无显著差异。使用 HAM-D 的混合效应模型表明,基线抑郁严重程度并不能调节 CBT 和 ADM 治疗结果之间的抑郁症状减轻(β=0.00;P=0.96)。BDI 也有类似的结果。基线抑郁严重程度也不能调节 CBT 和 ADM 之间的反应(OR,0.99;P=0.77)或缓解(OR,1.00;P=0.93)的可能性。
基线抑郁严重程度并未调节 HAM-D 或 BDI 上 CBT 和 ADM 之间的差异,也未调节反应或缓解。这一发现不能外推到其他心理疗法、个体抗抑郁药或住院患者。然而,它提供了新的、实质性的证据,与研究人员、医生和治疗师以及患者有关。