Suppr超能文献

耳鼻喉科医生治疗面部创伤的成本:美国耳鼻喉科学会-头颈外科学会调查。

The otolaryngologist's cost in treating facial trauma: American Academy of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery survey.

机构信息

Yokota Air Base, Japan.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Mar;146(3):366-71. doi: 10.1177/0194599811429007. Epub 2011 Nov 16.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

(1) To define practice patterns and perceptions of junior otolaryngologists treating maxillofacial/neck trauma. (2) To identify manners in which the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) can meet future trauma needs.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

Academic and private otolaryngology practices.

METHODS

A 26-question survey was designed to identify demographics, practice patterns, perceptions, and areas for improvement in maxillofacial/neck trauma care. It was distributed anonymously to AAO-HNS members completing residency from 2005 to 2009. Analysis included descriptive statistics and χ(2) comparisons.

RESULTS

Of 1343 otolaryngologists, 444 (33%) responded. A total of 85% of responding physicians treat maxillofacial/neck trauma, and 64% identify trauma as an ideal part of their practice. Sense of duty (54%), institutional requirements (33%), and enjoyment (32%) are the most common reasons for treating trauma. Major deterrents include patient noncompliance (60%) and lifestyle limitations (47%). Five respondents (3.1%) have been involved in a trauma-related lawsuit. While insufficient reimbursement is a major deterrent to treating trauma (52%), only 36% would increase their volume if reimbursement improved. Increased educational opportunities represent the most common request to the AAO-HNS (59%), followed by AAO-HNS focus on improved reimbursement and tort reform (28%).

CONCLUSION

Most junior otolaryngologists treat maxillofacial/neck trauma on a monthly basis. A total of 64% identify trauma as a component of their ideal practice. They report being well to very well trained in all facets of trauma, with the exception of vascular and laryngotracheal injuries; but they desire additional education, such as courses and panels. Universal concerns include inadequate reimbursement, limited pool of treating physicians, and lack of practice guidelines.

摘要

目的

(1) 定义初级耳鼻喉科医生治疗颌面/颈部创伤的实践模式和认知。(2) 确定美国耳鼻喉科学院-头颈外科学会 (AAO-HNS) 未来满足创伤需求的方式。

研究设计

横断面调查。

设置

学术和私人耳鼻喉科实践。

方法

设计了一个包含 26 个问题的调查,旨在确定颌面/颈部创伤护理的人口统计学、实践模式、认知和改进领域。它匿名分发给 2005 年至 2009 年完成住院医师培训的 AAO-HNS 成员。分析包括描述性统计和 χ(2)比较。

结果

在 1343 名耳鼻喉科医生中,有 444 名(33%)做出了回应。共有 85%的应答医生治疗颌面/颈部创伤,64%的医生认为创伤是他们理想实践的一部分。使命感(54%)、机构要求(33%)和享受(32%)是治疗创伤的最常见原因。主要障碍包括患者不遵医嘱(60%)和生活方式限制(47%)。有 5 名(3.1%)医生涉及与创伤相关的诉讼。尽管收入不足是治疗创伤的主要障碍(52%),但如果收入增加,只有 36%的人会增加他们的治疗量。增加教育机会是对 AAO-HNS 的最常见要求(59%),其次是 AAO-HNS 专注于提高报销和侵权改革(28%)。

结论

大多数初级耳鼻喉科医生每月治疗颌面/颈部创伤。共有 64%的人将创伤视为他们理想实践的一部分。他们报告在创伤的各个方面都受过良好到非常好的培训,除了血管和喉气管损伤;但他们希望获得更多的教育,如课程和小组讨论。普遍关注的问题包括报销不足、治疗医生人数有限以及缺乏实践指南。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验