Moses Helen, Powers David, Keeler Jarrod, Erdmann Detlev, Marcus Jeff, Puscas Liana, Woodard Charles
Division of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Division of Plastic, Reconstructive, Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2016 Mar;9(1):76-81. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1566160. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
The provision of trauma care is a financial burden, continually associated with low reimbursement, and shifts the economic burden to major trauma centers and providers. Meanwhile, the volume of craniomaxillofacial (CMF) trauma and the number of surgically managed facial fractures are unchanged. Past financial analyses of cost and reimbursement for facial trauma are limited to mandibular and midface injuries, consistently revealing low reimbursement. The incurred financial burden also coincides with the changing landscape of health insurance. The goal of this study is to determine the opportunity cost of operative management of facial trauma at our institution. From our CMF database of greater than 3,000 facial fractures, the physician charges, collections, and relative value units (RVUs) for CMF trauma per year from 2007 to 2013 were compared with a general plastic surgery and otolaryngology population undergoing operative management during this same period. Collection rates were analyzed to assess if a significant difference exists between reimbursement for CMF and non-CMF cases. Results revealed a significant difference between the professional collection rate for operative CMF trauma and that for other operative procedures (17.25 vs. 29.61%, respectively; p < 0.0001). The average number of RVUs billed per provider for CMF trauma declines significantly, from greater than 700 RVUs to 300 over the study period, despite a stable volume. Surgical management of CMF trauma generates an unfavorable financial environment. The large opportunity cost associated with offering this service is a potential threat to the sustainability of providing care for this population.
创伤护理的提供是一项经济负担,一直伴随着低报销率,并将经济负担转移到主要创伤中心和提供者身上。与此同时,颅颌面(CMF)创伤的数量和手术治疗的面部骨折数量没有变化。过去对面部创伤成本和报销的财务分析仅限于下颌骨和中面部损伤,一直显示报销率较低。所产生的财务负担也与不断变化的医疗保险格局相吻合。本研究的目的是确定在我们机构对面部创伤进行手术治疗的机会成本。从我们拥有超过3000例面部骨折的CMF数据库中,将2007年至2013年每年CMF创伤的医生收费、收款和相对价值单位(RVUs)与同期接受手术治疗的普通整形外科和耳鼻喉科人群进行比较。分析收款率以评估CMF和非CMF病例的报销之间是否存在显著差异。结果显示,CMF创伤手术的专业收款率与其他手术程序的收款率之间存在显著差异(分别为17.25%和29.61%;p < 0.0001)。尽管数量稳定,但在研究期间,每个提供者为CMF创伤开出的RVUs平均数量从超过700个显著下降到300个。CMF创伤的手术管理产生了不利的财务环境。提供这项服务所带来的巨大机会成本对为这一人群提供护理的可持续性构成了潜在威胁。