• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[2005 - 2006年美国食品药品监督管理局医疗器械召回分析]

[Analysis of FDA medical device recall in 2005-2006].

作者信息

Zhang Qiang, Liu Shenglin, Yan Yi, Fang Pengqian

机构信息

School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College of HUST, Wuhan, 430030, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi. 2011 Jul;35(4):280-3.

PMID:22097754
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To analyze medical device recall information of FDA U.S. and to address the safety issue of medical device.

METHOD

For each report, the recall class, product name, product class and recall reason were recorded and classified for analysis.

RESULTS

3093 reports were identified; the recalling reasons of the three classes were significantly different. It is found that the main recall reason for medical material is package problems (39%) and design defectiveness (19%), for medical tools are design defectiveness (27%) and package problems (26%), and for medical equipment are design defectiveness (45%) and system failures (39%). The number of software recalled is 109. The main recall reason for high risk equipment is design defectiveness, and the I class level of high risk equipment recalled was decline in 2006 compared to that in 2005.

CONCLUSION

Monitoring and application of medical device recall information should be strengthened, and the objective law of medical device safety issue should be summed up, in order to provide reference for supervision of medical device.

摘要

目的

分析美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的医疗器械召回信息,探讨医疗器械安全问题。

方法

记录每份报告的召回类别、产品名称、产品类别及召回原因,并进行分类分析。

结果

共识别出3093份报告;三类产品的召回原因存在显著差异。发现医用材料的主要召回原因是包装问题(39%)和设计缺陷(19%),医用工具是设计缺陷(27%)和包装问题(26%),医疗设备是设计缺陷(45%)和系统故障(39%)。召回的软件数量为109件。高风险设备的主要召回原因是设计缺陷,2006年召回的高风险设备I级水平与2005年相比有所下降。

结论

应加强医疗器械召回信息的监测与应用,总结医疗器械安全问题的客观规律,为医疗器械监管提供参考。

相似文献

1
[Analysis of FDA medical device recall in 2005-2006].[2005 - 2006年美国食品药品监督管理局医疗器械召回分析]
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi. 2011 Jul;35(4):280-3.
2
Overview of high-risk medical device recalls in obstetrics and gynecology from 2002 through 2016: implications for device safety.2002年至2016年妇产科高风险医疗器械召回概述:对器械安全性的影响
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;217(1):42-46.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.021. Epub 2017 May 10.
3
Medical device recall authority--FDA. Final rule.医疗器械召回管理局——美国食品药品监督管理局。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 1996 Nov 20;61(225):59004-22.
4
Software-Related Recalls of Health Information Technology and Other Medical Devices: Implications for FDA Regulation of Digital Health.与软件相关的健康信息技术及其他医疗设备召回:对美国食品药品监督管理局数字健康监管的影响
Milbank Q. 2017 Sep;95(3):535-553. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12278.
5
Medical Device Recalls in Radiation Oncology: Analysis of US Food and Drug Administration Data, 2002-2015.放射肿瘤学中的医疗器械召回:对美国食品药品监督管理局2002 - 2015年数据的分析
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jun 1;98(2):438-446. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.006. Epub 2017 Feb 12.
6
US Congress considers new tracking system for medical devices after excessive recalls.在过多召回事件后,美国国会考虑为医疗设备建立新的追踪系统。
BMJ. 2012 Apr 23;344:e2915. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2915.
7
Managing medical device hazards and recalls. ECRI's guide for setting up an effective program.
Health Devices. 2004 Feb;33(2):33-43.
8
Medical device recalls and the FDA approval process.医疗器械召回与美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的审批流程。
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jun 13;171(11):1006-11. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.30. Epub 2011 Feb 14.
9
The FDA and the medical device approval process.美国食品药品监督管理局与医疗器械审批流程。
Dent Implantol Update. 2012 May;23(5):33-7.
10
Myths and realities in medical packaging.医疗包装中的 myths 和 realities。(这里“myths”和“realities”可根据语境灵活翻译,比如“误区”和“真相”等)
Med Device Technol. 2003 Mar;14(2):16-7.