Suppr超能文献

与既往指征相比,绒毛取样用于异常筛查时的染色体核型异常患病率。

Chorionic villus sampling for abnormal screening compared to historical indications: prevalence of abnormal karyotypes.

作者信息

Marshall Nicole E, Fraley Gwen, Feist Cori, Burns Michael J, Pereira Leonardo

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239-3098, USA.

出版信息

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Aug;25(8):1463-6. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.640727. Epub 2011 Dec 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of abnormal karyotype results in women undergoing chorionic villus sampling (CVS) for abnormal first trimester screening compared to CVS for historical indications (advanced maternal age (AMA) or prior aneuploidy).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort of all patients undergoing CVS at Oregon Health & Science University from January 2006 to June 2010. Patients were separated based on CVS indication: (1) positive ultrasound (U/S) or serum screening; or (2) AMA or prior aneuploidy with normal or no screening. Prevalence of abnormal karyotype results were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Fetal karyotyping was successful in 500 of 506 CVS procedures performed. 203 CVS were performed for positive screening with 69 abnormal karyotypes (34.0%). 264 CVS were performed for historical indications with 11 abnormal karyotypes (4.2%). This difference was statistically significant (χ(2) 71.9, p < 0.001; OR 11.8 [95% CI 5.8, 24.6]). There were two age-related aneuplodies in AMA women without positive screening. 42 out of 44 AMA women diagnosed with aneuploidy (95.5%) had abnormal U/S and/or serum screening (35 U/S, 4 serum, 3 U/S and serum).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined ultrasound and serum screening should be recommended to all women, including AMA women, prior to undergoing invasive testing to improve risk-based counseling and minimize morbidity.

摘要

目的

确定与因既往指征(高龄产妇(AMA)或既往非整倍体)而行绒毛取样(CVS)的女性相比,因孕早期筛查异常而行CVS的女性中异常核型结果的患病率。

方法

对2006年1月至2010年6月在俄勒冈健康与科学大学接受CVS的所有患者进行回顾性队列研究。根据CVS指征将患者分组:(1)超声(U/S)或血清筛查阳性;或(2)AMA或既往非整倍体且筛查正常或未筛查。比较两组间异常核型结果的患病率。

结果

506例CVS操作中有500例胎儿核型分析成功。203例因筛查阳性而行CVS,其中69例核型异常(34.0%)。264例因既往指征而行CVS,其中11例核型异常(4.2%)。这种差异具有统计学意义(χ(2) 71.9,p < 0.001;OR 11.8 [95% CI 5.8, 24.6])。在未筛查阳性的AMA女性中有两例与年龄相关的非整倍体。44例被诊断为非整倍体的AMA女性中有42例(95.5%)U/S和/或血清筛查异常(35例U/S异常,4例血清异常,3例U/S和血清均异常)。

结论

在进行侵入性检测前,应向所有女性,包括AMA女性,推荐联合超声和血清筛查,以改善基于风险的咨询并将发病率降至最低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验