Suppr超能文献

新型基于单克隆抗体的散射比浊法检测游离轻链 κ 和 λ 与基于多克隆抗体的检测方法和免疫固定电泳的临床比较。

Clinical comparison of new monoclonal antibody-based nephelometric assays for free light chain kappa and lambda to polyclonal antibody-based assays and immunofixation electrophoresis.

机构信息

Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011 Nov 23;50(3):489-95. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.793.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

New monoclonal antibody-based assays for serum-free light chains (FLC) have become available.

METHODS

In a clinical study with 541 patients, the new N Latex FLC assays were compared with the Freelite FLC assays and immunofixation electrophoresis (IF).

RESULTS

Comparison of the different FLC kappa (κ) assays showed a slope of 0.99 with a deviation of 5.0%, rs=0.92, for FLC lambda (λ) a slope of 1.22, deviation 13.8%, rs=0.90 and for the κ/λ ratio a slope of 0.72, deviation -4.6%, rs=0.72. The concordance for the FLC κ assays was 91%, for FLC λ 85% and κ/λ ratio 95%. The clinical sensitivity and specificity of the κ/λ ratios in the study were comparable: 60% and 99% for the N Latex FLC assay and 61% and 97% for the Freelite assay. In IF-FLC positive samples, the N Latex FLC κ/λ ratio scored 20/23 (87%) samples outside the reference range and Freelite 21/23 (91%). For IF-FLC negative samples, N Latex FLC assay κ/λ ratio scored 338/350 (97%) within the reference range and Freelite scored 332/350 (95%).

CONCLUSIONS

The concordance scores and the clinical sensitivity and specificity of the new N Latex FLC assays and Freelite assays appeared comparable, but there are some differences in measurement of concentrations between the methods.

摘要

背景

新型基于单克隆抗体的血清游离轻链(FLC)检测方法已经问世。

方法

在一项包含 541 名患者的临床研究中,新的 N Latex FLC 检测方法与 Freelite FLC 检测方法和免疫固定电泳(IFE)进行了比较。

结果

不同κ(κ)型 FLC 检测方法的比较显示斜率为 0.99,偏差为 5.0%,rs=0.92;λ(λ)型 FLC 的斜率为 1.22,偏差为 13.8%,rs=0.90;κ/λ 比值的斜率为 0.72,偏差为-4.6%,rs=0.72。κ 型 FLC 检测方法的一致性为 91%,λ 型 FLC 为 85%,κ/λ 比值为 95%。在该研究中,κ/λ 比值的临床灵敏度和特异性相当:N Latex FLC 检测方法为 60%和 99%,Freelite 检测方法为 61%和 97%。在 IF-FLC 阳性样本中,N Latex FLC κ/λ 比值在参考范围内的 23 份样本中得分 20/23(87%),Freelite 为 21/23(91%)。对于 IF-FLC 阴性样本,N Latex FLC 检测方法 κ/λ 比值在参考范围内的 350 份样本中得分 338/350(97%),Freelite 得分 332/350(95%)。

结论

新的 N Latex FLC 检测方法和 Freelite 检测方法的一致性评分以及临床灵敏度和特异性相当,但两种方法在浓度测量方面存在一些差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验