Suppr超能文献

球周麻醉与球后麻醉

Peribulbar versus retrobulbar anaesthesia.

作者信息

Murdoch I E

机构信息

Eye Unit, Sutton Hospital, Surrey.

出版信息

Eye (Lond). 1990;4 ( Pt 3):445-9. doi: 10.1038/eye.1990.56.

Abstract

A prospective clinical trial comparing peribulbar with retrobulbar anaesthesia is reported. Ninety-nine consecutive patients for cataract extraction under local anaesthesia were randomly allocated to a peribulbar or retrobulbar technique. The effectiveness of the anaesthetic, the operative conditions, and the degree of patient discomfort were recorded. Pain scores (as assessed separately by the patient, surgeon, and attendant nurse) demonstrated that anaesthetic administration and surgery were less painful with the peribulbar method. This technique gave more reliable ocular akinesia and orbicularis oculi paralysis in addition to a lower operative complication rate.

摘要

本文报道了一项前瞻性临床试验,比较球周麻醉与球后麻醉。99例连续接受局部麻醉下白内障摘除术的患者被随机分配至球周麻醉组或球后麻醉组。记录麻醉效果、手术条件及患者不适程度。疼痛评分(由患者、外科医生及护理人员分别评估)显示,球周麻醉法在麻醉给药及手术过程中引起的疼痛较轻。除手术并发症发生率较低外,该技术还能提供更可靠的眼球运动麻痹及眼轮匝肌麻痹。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验