• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估弱势群体的吸烟状况:计算机自报式问卷评估是否准确且可接受?

Assessing smoking status in disadvantaged populations: is computer administered self report an accurate and acceptable measure?

机构信息

Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle, Hunter Medical Research Institute, Room 230A, Level 2, David Maddison Building, Callaghan NSW 2308 Australia.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Nov 21;11:153. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-153.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-11-153
PMID:22099396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3233509/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Self report of smoking status is potentially unreliable in certain situations and in high-risk populations. This study aimed to determine the accuracy and acceptability of computer administered self-report of smoking status among a low socioeconomic (SES) population.

METHODS

Clients attending a community service organisation for welfare support were invited to complete a cross-sectional touch screen computer health survey. Following survey completion, participants were invited to provide a breath sample to measure exposure to tobacco smoke in expired air. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated.

RESULTS

Three hundred and eighty three participants completed the health survey, and 330 (86%) provided a breath sample. Of participants included in the validation analysis, 59% reported being a daily or occasional smoker. Sensitivity was 94.4% and specificity 92.8%. The positive and negative predictive values were 94.9% and 92.0% respectively. The majority of participants reported that the touch screen survey was both enjoyable (79%) and easy (88%) to complete.

CONCLUSIONS

Computer administered self report is both acceptable and accurate as a method of assessing smoking status among low SES smokers in a community setting. Routine collection of health information using touch-screen computer has the potential to identify smokers and increase provision of support and referral in the community setting.

摘要

背景

在某些情况下和高危人群中,自我报告的吸烟状况可能不可靠。本研究旨在确定在社会经济地位较低(SES)人群中,计算机管理的自我报告吸烟状况的准确性和可接受性。

方法

邀请参加福利支持社区服务组织的客户完成横断面触摸屏计算机健康调查。完成调查后,邀请参与者提供呼气样本以测量呼出空气中的烟草烟雾暴露量。计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。

结果

383 名参与者完成了健康调查,其中 330 名(86%)提供了呼气样本。在纳入验证分析的参与者中,59%报告为每日或偶尔吸烟者。敏感性为 94.4%,特异性为 92.8%。阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 94.9%和 92.0%。大多数参与者表示,触摸屏调查既愉快(79%)又容易(88%)完成。

结论

在社区环境中,计算机管理的自我报告是评估 SES 较低的吸烟者吸烟状况的一种既可接受又准确的方法。使用触摸屏计算机常规收集健康信息有可能在社区环境中识别吸烟者并增加支持和转介服务。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dfc/3233509/37ede50d24ea/1471-2288-11-153-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dfc/3233509/37ede50d24ea/1471-2288-11-153-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dfc/3233509/37ede50d24ea/1471-2288-11-153-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing smoking status in disadvantaged populations: is computer administered self report an accurate and acceptable measure?评估弱势群体的吸烟状况:计算机自报式问卷评估是否准确且可接受?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Nov 21;11:153. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-153.
2
A survey of smoking prevalence and interest in quitting among social and community service organisation clients in Australia: a unique opportunity for reaching the disadvantaged.澳大利亚社会和社区服务组织客户的吸烟流行率和戒烟意愿调查:为弱势群体提供服务的独特机会。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Oct 26;11:827. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-827.
3
Money as motivation to quit: a survey of a non-random Australian sample of socially disadvantaged smokers' views of the acceptability of cash incentives.金钱作为戒烟的动力:对澳大利亚社会劣势吸烟者对现金奖励可接受性看法的非随机抽样调查。
Prev Med. 2012 Aug;55(2):122-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.06.001. Epub 2012 Jun 10.
4
A cross-sectional survey of health risk behaviour clusters among a sample of socially disadvantaged Australian welfare recipients.一项横断面调查研究,调查了澳大利亚社会弱势群体福利接受者样本中的健康风险行为群。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2013 Apr;37(2):118-23. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12028.
5
Financial Stress and Smoking within a Large Sample of Socially Disadvantaged Australians.澳大利亚大量社会弱势群体中的经济压力与吸烟情况
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Feb 25;14(3):231. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14030231.
6
A cross-sectional survey assessing the acceptability and feasibility of self-report electronic data collection about health risks from patients attending an Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Service.一项横断面调查评估了在一家土著社区控制的医疗服务机构就诊的患者自我报告健康风险相关电子数据采集的可接受性和可行性。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Apr 16;14:34. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-34.
7
RCT of a client-centred, caseworker-delivered smoking cessation intervention for a socially disadvantaged population.以客户为中心、个案工作者提供的针对社会弱势群体的戒烟干预的随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jan 31;11(1):70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-70.
8
A cross sectional survey of internet use among a highly socially disadvantaged population of tobacco smokers.一项针对高度社会劣势的吸烟人群中互联网使用情况的横断面调查。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2019 Oct 15;14(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13722-019-0168-y.
9
Missed opportunities: general practitioner identification of their patients' smoking status.错失的机会:全科医生对其患者吸烟状况的识别
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Feb 4;16:8. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0228-7.
10
Self-Exempting Beliefs and Intention to Quit Smoking within a Socially Disadvantaged Australian Sample of Smokers.澳大利亚社会弱势群体吸烟者中的自我豁免信念与戒烟意愿
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Jan 11;13(1):118. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13010118.

引用本文的文献

1
Smoking Status and Survival in Patients With Early-Stage Primary Cutaneous Melanoma.早期原发性皮肤黑色素瘤患者的吸烟状况与生存情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e2354751. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.54751.
2
Multidimensional pain profiling in people living with obesity and attending weight management services: a protocol for a longitudinal cohort study.多维疼痛评估在肥胖人群和参加体重管理服务中的应用:一项纵向队列研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 16;12(12):e065188. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065188.
3
Planning a Change Easily (PACE) for smokers who are not ready to quit: a telephone-based, randomized controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Delivering smoking cessation support to disadvantaged groups: a qualitative study of the potential of community welfare organizations.为弱势群体提供戒烟支持:社区福利组织潜力的定性研究。
Health Educ Res. 2010 Dec;25(6):979-90. doi: 10.1093/her/cyq051. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
2
Using breath carbon monoxide to validate self-reported tobacco smoking in remote Australian Indigenous communities.利用呼吸一氧化碳验证偏远的澳大利亚原住民社区的自我报告吸烟情况。
Popul Health Metr. 2010 Feb 20;8(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1478-7954-8-2.
3
The validity and reliability of an interactive computer tobacco and alcohol use survey in general practice.
针对尚未准备好戒烟的吸烟者,实施轻松计划改变(PACE):一项基于电话的随机对照试验。
Addiction. 2022 Jun;117(6):1748-1757. doi: 10.1111/add.15796. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
4
Correlation between radiographic knee osteoarthritis and lifetime cigarette smoking amount in a Korean population: A cross-sectional study.韩国人群中膝关节影像学骨关节炎与终生吸烟量的相关性:一项横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 26;99(26):e20839. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020839.
5
A comparison of self-reported to cotinine-detected smoking status among adults in Georgia.乔治亚州成年人自我报告与可替宁检测到的吸烟状况比较。
Eur J Public Health. 2020 Oct 1;30(5):1007-1012. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa093.
6
A Web-Based Communication Platform to Improve Home Care Services in Norway (DigiHelse): Pilot Study.挪威用于改善家庭护理服务的基于网络的通信平台(DigiHelse):试点研究
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Jan 20;4(1):e14780. doi: 10.2196/14780.
7
Patterns of cigarette, e-cigarette, and cannabis use among adult smokers in primary care 2014-2015.2014-2015 年初级保健中成年吸烟者的香烟、电子烟和大麻使用模式。
Addict Behav. 2020 Jan;100:106109. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106109. Epub 2019 Aug 25.
8
Cancer Screening Patterns Among Current, Former, and Never Smokers in the United States, 2010-2015.美国当前、曾经和从不吸烟者在 2010-2015 年间的癌症筛查模式。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e193759. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3759.
9
The BeHealthyR Study: a randomized trial of a multicomponent intervention to reduce stress, smoking and improve financial health of low-income residents in Rotterdam.BeHealthyR 研究:一项随机试验,旨在通过多组分干预措施降低鹿特丹低收入居民的压力、吸烟率并改善其金融健康状况。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jul 18;18(1):891. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5728-7.
10
Smoking and Accelerated Lung Function Decline in HIV-Positive Individuals: A Secondary Analysis of the START Pulmonary Substudy.HIV 阳性个体中吸烟与肺功能加速下降:START 肺部子研究的二次分析。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018 Nov 1;79(3):e85-e92. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001797.
一般实践中交互式计算机烟草和酒精使用调查的有效性和可靠性。
Addict Behav. 2010 May;35(5):492-8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.12.030. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
4
Assessing the accuracy of self-reported smoking status and impact of passive smoke exposure among pregnant Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women using cotinine biochemical validation.使用可替宁生物化学验证评估吸烟状况自我报告的准确性和被动吸烟暴露对土著和托雷斯海峡岛民孕妇的影响。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2010 Jan;29(1):35-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00078.x.
5
Biomedical risk assessment as an aid for smoking cessation.生物医学风险评估辅助戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15(2):CD004705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004705.pub3.
6
Computerized assessment of surgical patients for tobacco use: accuracy and acceptability.手术患者烟草使用情况的计算机化评估:准确性与可接受性。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2007 Jun;29(2):183-5. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdm015. Epub 2007 Apr 24.
7
Expired carbon monoxide levels in self-reported smokers and nonsmokers in prison.监狱中自我报告的吸烟者和非吸烟者的呼出一氧化碳水平。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Oct;8(5):653-9. doi: 10.1080/14622200600789684.
8
Touch-screen computer systems in the rheumatology clinic offer a reliable and user-friendly means of collecting quality-of-life and outcome data from patients with rheumatoid arthritis.风湿病诊所中的触摸屏计算机系统提供了一种可靠且用户友好的方式,用于收集类风湿性关节炎患者的生活质量和治疗结果数据。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006 Jan;45(1):66-71. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kei100. Epub 2005 Nov 1.
9
Cut-off levels for breath carbon monoxide as a marker for cigarette smoking.作为吸烟标志物的呼出气一氧化碳截断水平。
Addiction. 2005 Feb;100(2):159-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00957.x.
10
Measurements for active cigarette smoke exposure in prevalence and cessation studies: why simply asking pregnant women isn't enough.在患病率和戒烟研究中测量主动吸烟暴露情况:为何仅仅询问孕妇是不够的。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2004 Apr;6 Suppl 2:S141-51. doi: 10.1080/14622200410001669141.