Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Water Res. 2012 Dec 15;46(20):6775-86. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.10.017. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
The hydraulic performance of grass swales as a highway stormwater control measure was evaluated in a field-scale study adjacent to a Maryland highway. Two common swale design alternatives, pretreatment grass filter strips and vegetated check dams, were compared during 52 storm events over 4.5 years. Swale performance is described via three regimes, dependent on the relative size of the rainfall event. Overall, half of the events were small enough that the entire flow was stored, infiltrated, and evapotranspirated by the swales, resulting in no net swale discharge. Swales significantly reduced total volume and flow magnitudes generally during events with rainfall less than 3 cm. While the majority of improvement can be attributed to the swales, inclusion of check dams increases swale effectiveness. Pretreatment grass filter strips produced mixed effects. The swales demonstrated essentially no volumetric reduction during large storm events, functioning instead as conveyance, and smoothing fluctuations in flow.
在马里兰州一条公路旁的实地研究中,评估了草沟作为公路雨水控制措施的水力性能。在 4.5 年的 52 次暴雨事件中,比较了两种常见的草沟设计方案:预处理草过滤带和植被消力坎。通过三个依赖于降雨事件相对大小的阶段来描述草沟的性能。总体而言,一半的事件小到足以让整个水流被草沟储存、渗透和蒸发,从而没有净草沟排放。在降雨量小于 3 厘米的事件中,草沟通常显著降低总水量和流量。虽然大部分改善可以归因于草沟,但消力坎的加入增加了草沟的有效性。预处理草过滤带产生了混合效果。在大暴雨事件中,草沟基本上没有减少水量,而是起到了输送和减缓水流波动的作用。