Urban Water Engineering, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.
Urban Water Engineering, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jun 15;669:431-447. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.072. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
Increasing interest in urban drainage green infrastructure brings attention to grass swales and filter strips (GS&GFS) and their role in stormwater management. While the understanding of the hydrology and hydraulics of these stormwater control measures is adequate for current needs, there are knowledge gaps in understanding the water quality processes in GS&GFS and such a finding motivated preparation of the review paper that follows. The review revealed that most of the empirical studies of GS&GFS flow quality focused on the removal of pollutants associated with road runoff, and particularly solids, with relatively few studies addressing nutrients, traffic associated hydrocarbons, oxygen demanding substances, chloride, and faecal indicator bacteria. The reported results suffer from limitations caused by experimental conditions often representing a steady flow used to irrigate GS&GFS and generate runoff, non-submerged flows, no lateral inflows along swale side slopes, constant dosing of solids, emphasis on larger-than-typical solids, incomplete descriptions of experimental conditions, and limited attention to experimental uncertainties. Besides settling, other treatment processes, like adsorption/desorption, plant uptake, chemical precipitation and microbial degradation are often acknowledged, but without attempting to quantify their effects on flow quality. The modelling of GS&GFS flow quality would be beneficial for an improved understanding of green urban drainage infrastructure, but currently it is infeasible without a better knowledge of stormwater quality processes in GS&GFS facilities.
人们对城市排水绿色基础设施越来越感兴趣,这引起了人们对草沟和过滤带(GS&GFS)及其在雨水管理中的作用的关注。虽然这些雨水控制措施的水文学和水力学的理解足以满足当前的需求,但在理解 GS&GFS 中的水质过程方面仍存在知识空白,正是这种发现促使我们编写了以下综述论文。综述表明,大多数关于 GS&GFS 水流质量的实证研究都集中在去除与道路径流相关的污染物上,特别是固体污染物,而很少有研究涉及营养物、交通相关烃类、需氧物质、氯化物和粪便指示细菌。所报告的结果受到实验条件的限制,实验条件通常代表用于灌溉 GS&GFS 和产生径流的稳定流、非淹没流、沿草沟边坡没有侧向流入、固体的恒定剂量、强调大于典型的固体、对实验条件的描述不完整以及对实验不确定性的关注有限。除沉降外,其他处理过程,如吸附/解吸、植物吸收、化学沉淀和微生物降解通常也得到承认,但没有试图量化它们对水流质量的影响。GS&GFS 水流质量的建模有助于更好地理解绿色城市排水基础设施,但如果对 GS&GFS 设施中的雨水水质过程没有更好的了解,目前是不可行的。