Suppr超能文献

使用实时超声低机械指数(MI)灰阶和对比增强技术对肝脏局灶性病变的特征进行描述:现场非盲法与远程盲法阅读比较。

Characterisation of focal liver lesions with unenhanced and contrast enhanced low MI real time ultrasound: on-site unblinded versus off-site blinded reading.

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Petersgraben 4, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2012 Mar;81(3):e317-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.10.015. Epub 2011 Nov 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare on-site and blinded off-site reading of baseline ultrasound (US) and contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for classification and characterisation of focal liver lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

99 patients (57 women and 42 men, age range 18-89 years, mean age: 59 years) with 53 malignant and 46 benign liver lesions were studied with unenhanced US followed by contrast enhanced US after injection of 2.4 ml SonoVue® (Bracco, Milano, Italy). Image interpretation was performed on-site with clinical information available by consensus of two readers and off-site by two independent blinded readers at two different centers. Comparison of pre and post contrast scans and of the different readers was performed. Reference examinations were histology, intraoperative US, MRI or CT.

RESULTS

Sensitivity for malignancy improved from 81/89/66% (on-site/off-site reader 1/2) before to 100/96/96% post contrast administration (p<0.05, except for reader 1). Specificity improved from 48/48/54% on baseline US to 89/80/76% on CEUS (p<0.05). Accuracy for specific lesion diagnosis was 62/59/50% pre and 90/77/72% post contrast (p<0.05). Classification and characterisation post contrast were mildly inferior for off-site reading. Agreement between on-site and off-site readers of unenhanced scans was fair (κ=0.29-0.39) while it was good for CEUS (κ=0.63-0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS improves classification and characterisation of focal liver lesions and interobserver agreement compared to conventional US. Classification and characterisation post contrast were mildly but statistically significantly better for on-site than for off-site reading.

摘要

目的

比较现场和远程阅片(盲法)对肝脏局灶性病变的基础超声(US)和对比增强超声(CEUS)的分类和特征描述。

材料与方法

对 99 例(57 名女性和 42 名男性,年龄 18-89 岁,平均年龄:59 岁)患者的 53 个恶性和 46 个良性肝脏病变进行研究,采用常规 US 后注射 2.4ml SonoVue®(意大利米兰 Bracco 公司)进行对比增强 US。图像解读由两位读者在现场根据临床信息进行共识解读,并由两个独立的远程阅片者在两个不同的中心进行盲法解读。比较了平扫和增强前后扫描以及不同读者之间的结果。参考检查为组织学、术中 US、MRI 或 CT。

结果

恶性病变的敏感性从基础 US 的 81/89/66%(现场/远程读者 1/2)提高到增强后 100/96/96%(p<0.05,读者 1 除外)。特异性从基础 US 的 48/48/54%提高到 CEUS 的 89/80/76%(p<0.05)。特定病变诊断的准确性在增强前为 62/59/50%,增强后为 90/77/72%(p<0.05)。远程阅片的分类和特征描述略差。增强前后,现场和远程读者的未增强扫描之间的一致性为中等(κ=0.29-0.39),而 CEUS 的一致性为良好(κ=0.63-0.79)。

结论

CEUS 可提高肝脏局灶性病变的分类和特征描述,并提高与常规 US 相比的观察者间一致性。增强后,现场阅片的分类和特征描述略优于远程阅片。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验