Suppr超能文献

UPLIFT® COPD 试验中的病因特异性死亡率判定:结果与建议。

Cause-specific mortality adjudication in the UPLIFT® COPD trial: findings and recommendations.

机构信息

Centre for Infection and Immunity, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland, UK.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2012 Apr;106(4):515-21. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.10.009. Epub 2011 Nov 18.

Abstract

Mortality is an important endpoint in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) trials, although accurately determining cause of death is difficult. In the Understanding the Potential Long-term Impacts on Function with Tiotropium (UPLIFT®) trial, a mortality adjudication committee (MAC) provided systematic, independent and blinded assessment of cause-specific mortality of all 981 reported deaths. Here we describe this process of mortality adjudication and methodological revisions introduced to help standardise the adjudication of two areas recognised to pose particular difficulty; firstly, the classification of fatal COPD exacerbations that occur in the setting of pneumonia and secondly, the categorisation of sudden death. In addition MAC determined cause of death was compared with that reported by site investigators (SIs). MAC-assigned causes of death were: respiratory, 35%; cancer, 25%; cardiovascular, 11%; sudden cardiac death, 4.4%; sudden death, 3.4%; other, 8.8%; unknown, 12.4%. Cancer/cardiac deaths were more common in Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage II, respiratory deaths in stages III and IV. Agreement between MAC and SI regarding cause of death was complete (50.2%), incomplete (18.5%) or none (31.3%). The SI classified deaths as cardiac three-fold more frequently than MAC (incidence rate [IR]/100 patient-years 0.797 vs. 0.257), although IR ratios for cardiac deaths for tiotropium vs. control were similar between SI and MAC. Discrepancies between MAC- and SI-adjudicated causes of death are common, especially increased reporting of cardiac deaths by the SI. Future multicentre COPD trials should plan appropriate infrastructure before study initiation to ensure collection and interpretation of fatal events data.

摘要

死亡率是慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)试验中的一个重要终点,尽管准确确定死因较为困难。在噻托溴铵治疗对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者潜在长期影响研究(UPLIFT®)中,死因判定委员会(MAC)对所有 981 例报告的死亡病例进行了系统、独立和盲法的死因评估。本文介绍了死因判定的过程以及为了帮助规范判定两个具有特殊困难的领域而引入的方法学修订,第一个是在肺炎背景下发生的致命性 COPD 加重的分类,第二个是猝死的分类。此外,MAC 还确定了死亡原因与研究地点研究者(SI)报告的死亡原因是否相符。MAC 分配的死因是:呼吸原因,35%;癌症,25%;心血管原因,11%;心源性猝死,4.4%;猝死,3.4%;其他,8.8%;未知,12.4%。在全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病倡议 II 期,癌症/心脏死亡更为常见,而在 III 期和 IV 期,呼吸死亡更为常见。MAC 和 SI 对死因的判断完全一致(50.2%)、不完全一致(18.5%)或无一致意见(31.3%)。SI 对死亡原因的分类是心脏原因的三倍(发病率[IR]/100 患者年 0.797 比 0.257),尽管噻托溴铵与安慰剂相比,SI 和 MAC 报告的心脏死亡的 IR 比值相似。MAC 和 SI 判定的死因存在差异较为常见,尤其是 SI 报告的心脏死亡增加。未来的多中心 COPD 试验应在研究启动前规划适当的基础设施,以确保致命事件数据的收集和解释。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验