Cardiovascular Division, Cardiology Department, AP-HP, Bichat Hospital, 46 rue Henri Huchard, Paris, France.
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Apr;13(4):324-9. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jer244. Epub 2011 Nov 18.
Quantitative assessment of the severity of mitral regurgitation (MR) is based on the calculation of the effective regurgitant orifice (ERO), a measure of lesion severity, and of the regurgitant volume (RVol), a measure of left ventricular volume overload. We aimed at evaluating the determinants of RVol in both organic (OMR) and functional mitral regurgitation (FMR).
MR severity was quantitatively assessed using the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method in 240 patients, 142 with OMR and 98 patients with FMR. By definition, ERO and RVol were strongly correlated both in patients with OMR and FMR (both R = 0.90, P < 0.0001) but the slopes of the regression lines were significantly different (P < 0.0001). This difference remained significant in patients with elevated systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP > 40 mmHg, P < 0.0001) but not in patients with normal SPAP (≤40 mmHg, P = 0.09). In multivariate analysis, independent determinants of RVol were ERO (P < 0.0001), MR mechanism (FMR/OMR) (P = 0.0003) and SPAP (P = 0.03). In patients with elevated SPAP, ERO (P < 0.0001), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (P = 0.03), and MR mechanism (P = 0.03) were independently associated with RVol, whereas in patients with normal SPAP, ERO (P < 0.0001) was the only independent determinant of RVol.
In the present study, we evaluated the contrasting effect of similar lesion severity in OMR and FMR and showed that similar ERO were associated with lower RVol in FMR compared with OMR. The regurgitant volume is the result of complex interactions of anatomic lesions, LVEF, and SPAP and our results highlight the importance of taking into account these parameters when interpreting RVol values in clinical practice, especially in FMR.
二尖瓣反流(MR)严重程度的定量评估基于有效反流口(ERO)的计算,这是病变严重程度的衡量标准,以及反流容积(RVol),这是左心室容积超负荷的衡量标准。我们旨在评估有机性(OMR)和功能性二尖瓣反流(FMR)中 RVol 的决定因素。
在 240 例患者中,使用近端等速表面积(PISA)方法定量评估 MR 严重程度,其中 142 例为 OMR,98 例为 FMR。根据定义,ERO 和 RVol 在 OMR 和 FMR 患者中均高度相关(均 R = 0.90,P < 0.0001),但回归线的斜率有显著差异(P < 0.0001)。在肺动脉收缩压升高(SPAP > 40 mmHg,P < 0.0001)的患者中,这种差异仍然显著,但在 SPAP 正常(≤40 mmHg,P = 0.09)的患者中则不显著。多元分析表明,RVol 的独立决定因素为 ERO(P < 0.0001)、MR 机制(FMR/OMR)(P = 0.0003)和 SPAP(P = 0.03)。在 SPAP 升高的患者中,ERO(P < 0.0001)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)(P = 0.03)和 MR 机制(P = 0.03)与 RVol 独立相关,而在 SPAP 正常的患者中,ERO(P < 0.0001)是 RVol 的唯一独立决定因素。
在本研究中,我们评估了 OMR 和 FMR 中相似病变严重程度的对比效果,并表明在 FMR 中,相似的 ERO 与 OMR 相比,与较低的 RVol 相关。反流容积是解剖病变、LVEF 和 SPAP 复杂相互作用的结果,我们的研究结果强调了在临床实践中解释 RVol 值时考虑这些参数的重要性,特别是在 FMR 中。