• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭健康促进计划(FHPP):一项旨在增加高危家庭结肠镜筛查的随机试验的设计和基线数据。

The Family Health Promotion Project (FHPP): design and baseline data from a randomized trial to increase colonoscopy screening in high risk families.

机构信息

University of Colorado Cancer Center, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Aurora, CO 80045-0508, United States.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Mar;33(2):426-35. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.11.005. Epub 2011 Nov 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2011.11.005
PMID:22101228
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4303240/
Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity in the United States, much of which could be prevented through adequate screening. Consensus guidelines recommend that high-risk groups initiate screening earlier with colonoscopy and more frequently than average risk persons. However, a large proportion of high risk individuals do not receive regular colonoscopic screening. The Family Health Promotion Project (FHPP) is a randomized-controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a telephone-based counseling intervention to increase adherence to risk-appropriate colonoscopy screening in high risk individuals. Unaffected members of CRC families from two national cancer family registries were enrolled (n=632) and randomized to receive either a single session telephone counseling intervention using Motivational Interviewing techniques or a minimal mail-out intervention. The primary endpoint, rate of colonoscopy screening, was assessed at 6, 12 and 24 months post-enrollment. In this paper, we describe the research design and telephone counseling intervention of the FHPP trial, and report baseline data obtained from the two high risk cohorts recruited into this trial. Results obtained at baseline confirm the need for interventions to promote colonoscopy screening among these high risk individuals, as well as highlighting several key opportunities for intervention, including increasing knowledge about risk-appropriate screening guidelines, and providing both tailored risk information and barriers counseling.

摘要

结直肠癌(CRC)是美国死亡率和发病率的重要原因,其中很大一部分可以通过充分的筛查来预防。共识指南建议高风险人群通过结肠镜检查更早开始筛查,并比一般风险人群更频繁地进行筛查。然而,很大一部分高风险人群没有接受定期结肠镜筛查。家庭健康促进计划(FHPP)是一项随机对照试验,旨在测试基于电话的咨询干预措施对增加高风险人群中风险适当的结肠镜筛查依从性的有效性。从两个国家癌症家族登记处招募了 CRC 家族中未受影响的成员(n=632),并随机分配接受单次电话咨询干预(使用动机性访谈技术)或最小邮件干预。主要终点,即结肠镜筛查率,在入组后 6、12 和 24 个月进行评估。在本文中,我们描述了 FHPP 试验的研究设计和电话咨询干预措施,并报告了从该试验招募的两个高风险队列获得的基线数据。基线结果证实了需要干预措施来促进这些高风险人群的结肠镜筛查,同时还突出了几个干预的关键机会,包括增加对风险适当筛查指南的了解,并提供个性化的风险信息和障碍咨询。

相似文献

1
The Family Health Promotion Project (FHPP): design and baseline data from a randomized trial to increase colonoscopy screening in high risk families.家庭健康促进计划(FHPP):一项旨在增加高危家庭结肠镜筛查的随机试验的设计和基线数据。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Mar;33(2):426-35. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.11.005. Epub 2011 Nov 12.
2
A randomized trial to increase colonoscopy screening in members of high-risk families in the colorectal cancer family registry and cancer genetics network.一项旨在提高结直肠癌家族登记处和癌症遗传学网络中高危家族成员结肠镜检查筛查率的随机试验。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Apr;23(4):601-10. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1085. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
3
Colonoscopy uptake for high-risk individuals with a family history of colorectal neoplasia: A multicenter, randomized trial of tailored counseling versus standard information.有结直肠肿瘤家族史的高危个体的结肠镜检查接受情况:一项关于个性化咨询与标准信息的多中心随机试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug;95(33):e4303. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004303.
4
Motivational interviewing and colorectal cancer screening: a peek from the inside out.动机性访谈与结直肠癌筛查:从内而外的窥探
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Aug;72(2):210-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.03.023. Epub 2008 May 8.
5
[Family risk information for colorectal cancer. Perspectives on the effectiveness of a tailored intervention].[结直肠癌的家族风险信息。关于定制干预措施有效性的观点]
Sante Publique. 2019;S2(HS2):79-89. doi: 10.3917/spub.197.0079.
6
Improving adherence to surveillance and screening recommendations for people with colorectal cancer and their first degree relatives: a randomized controlled trial.提高结直肠癌患者及其一级亲属遵循监测和筛查建议的依从性:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Cancer. 2012 Feb 8;12:62. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-62.
7
Telephone versus in-person colorectal cancer risk and screening intervention for first-degree relatives: A randomized controlled trial.电话干预与面对面干预在一级亲属结直肠癌风险和筛查中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Cancer. 2019 Jul 1;125(13):2272-2282. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32032. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
8
Invitation to Screening Colonoscopy in the Population at Familial Risk for Colorectal Cancer.家族性结直肠癌高危人群的结肠镜筛查邀请。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2018 Oct 26;115(43):715-722. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0715.
9
A Randomized Trial to Compare a Tailored Web-Based Intervention and Tailored Phone Counseling to Usual Care for Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening.一项比较基于网络的个性化干预与个性化电话咨询和常规护理对提高结直肠癌筛查的随机试验
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Dec;27(12):1433-1441. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0180. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
10
Association of Race and Socioeconomic Status With Colorectal Cancer Screening, Colorectal Cancer Risk, and Mortality in Southern US Adults.种族和社会经济地位与美国南部成年人结直肠癌筛查、结直肠癌风险和死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1917995. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17995.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Effectiveness of Two Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening for Those at Increased Risk Based on Family History: Results of a Randomized Trial.基于家族史的风险增加人群的两种干预措施增加结直肠癌筛查的比较效果:一项随机试验的结果。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Jan;29(1):3-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0797. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
2
Examining intrafamilial communication of colorectal cancer risk status to family members and kin responses to colonoscopy: a qualitative study.探究结直肠癌风险状况在家族内部向家庭成员的传达以及亲属对结肠镜检查的反应:一项定性研究。
Hered Cancer Clin Pract. 2019 Jun 26;17:16. doi: 10.1186/s13053-019-0114-8. eCollection 2019.
3
Understanding the contribution of family history to colorectal cancer risk and its clinical implications: A state-of-the-science review.了解家族史对结直肠癌风险的影响及其临床意义:一项科学现状综述。
Cancer. 2016 Sep 1;122(17):2633-45. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30080. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
4
Knowledge and Uptake of Genetic Counseling and Colonoscopic Screening Among Individuals at Increased Risk for Lynch Syndrome and their Endoscopists from the Family Health Promotion Project.家庭健康促进项目中林奇综合征风险增加个体及其内镜医师对遗传咨询和结肠镜筛查的认知与接受情况
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb;111(2):285-93. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.397. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
5
Tailored telephone counseling increases colorectal cancer screening.量身定制的电话咨询可提高结直肠癌筛查率。
Health Educ Res. 2015 Aug;30(4):622-37. doi: 10.1093/her/cyv021. Epub 2015 May 28.
6
Practical opportunities to improve early detection and prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) in members of high-risk families.改善高危家庭成员结直肠癌(CRC)早期检测和预防的实际机会。
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Mar;60(3):748-61. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3567-2. Epub 2015 Feb 20.
7
A randomized trial to increase colonoscopy screening in members of high-risk families in the colorectal cancer family registry and cancer genetics network.一项旨在提高结直肠癌家族登记处和癌症遗传学网络中高危家族成员结肠镜检查筛查率的随机试验。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Apr;23(4):601-10. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1085. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
8
Telehealth personalized cancer risk communication to motivate colonoscopy in relatives of patients with colorectal cancer: the family CARE Randomized controlled trial.远程医疗个性化癌症风险沟通以激励结直肠癌患者亲属进行结肠镜检查:家庭关怀随机对照试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar 1;32(7):654-62. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.51.6765. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
9
Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.关于进行筛查测试的明智决策的个性化风险沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Feb 28;2013(2):CD001865. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001865.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Colorectal cancer screening barriers and facilitators in older persons.老年人结直肠癌筛查的障碍和促进因素。
Prev Med. 2010 Jan-Feb;50(1-2):3-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.12.005. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
2
Toward a theory of motivational interviewing.迈向动机性访谈理论
Am Psychol. 2009 Sep;64(6):527-37. doi: 10.1037/a0016830.
3
The effectiveness and applicability of motivational interviewing: a practice-friendly review of four meta-analyses.动机性访谈的有效性和适用性:四项荟萃分析的实用友好综述。
J Clin Psychol. 2009 Nov;65(11):1232-45. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20638.
4
Motivational interviewing and colorectal cancer screening: a peek from the inside out.动机性访谈与结直肠癌筛查:从内而外的窥探
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Aug;72(2):210-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.03.023. Epub 2008 May 8.
5
Screening participation in individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer: a review.对有结直肠癌家族史个体的筛查参与情况:一项综述
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2008 May;17(3):221-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00834.x.
6
Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology.《2008年结直肠癌和腺瘤性息肉早期检测的筛查与监测:美国癌症协会、美国结直肠癌多学会特别工作组和美国放射学会联合指南》
Gastroenterology. 2008 May;134(5):1570-95. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
7
Validation of self-reported colorectal cancer screening behavior from a mixed-mode survey of veterans.对退伍军人混合模式调查中自我报告的结直肠癌筛查行为的验证。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Apr;17(4):768-76. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0759. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
8
Accuracy of self-reported cancer-screening histories: a meta-analysis.自我报告的癌症筛查史的准确性:一项荟萃分析。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Apr;17(4):748-57. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2629. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
9
Reliability and validity of a questionnaire to measure colorectal cancer screening behaviors: does mode of survey administration matter?一份用于测量结直肠癌筛查行为的问卷的信效度:调查实施方式重要吗?
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Apr;17(4):758-67. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2855. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
10
Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States.美国一般风险老年成年人结直肠癌筛查行为的预测因素。
Cancer Causes Control. 2008 May;19(4):339-59. doi: 10.1007/s10552-007-9100-y. Epub 2007 Dec 18.