Suppr超能文献

了解家族史对结直肠癌风险的影响及其临床意义:一项科学现状综述。

Understanding the contribution of family history to colorectal cancer risk and its clinical implications: A state-of-the-science review.

作者信息

Lowery Jan T, Ahnen Dennis J, Schroy Paul C, Hampel Heather, Baxter Nancy, Boland C Richard, Burt Randall W, Butterly Lynn, Doerr Megan, Doroshenk Mary, Feero W Gregory, Henrikson Nora, Ladabaum Uri, Lieberman David, McFarland Elizabeth G, Peterson Susan K, Raymond Martha, Samadder N Jewel, Syngal Sapna, Weber Thomas K, Zauber Ann G, Smith Robert

机构信息

Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado.

School of Medicine and Gastroenterology of the Rockies, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado.

出版信息

Cancer. 2016 Sep 1;122(17):2633-45. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30080. Epub 2016 Jun 3.

Abstract

Persons with a family history (FH) of colorectal cancer (CRC) or adenomas that are not due to known hereditary syndromes have an increased risk for CRC. An understanding of these risks, screening recommendations, and screening behaviors can inform strategies for reducing the CRC burden in these families. A comprehensive review of the literature published within the past 10 years has been performed to assess what is known about cancer risk, screening guidelines, adherence and barriers to screening, and effective interventions in persons with an FH of CRC and to identify FH tools used to identify these individuals and inform care. Existing data show that having 1 affected first-degree relative (FDR) increases the CRC risk 2-fold, and the risk increases with multiple affected FDRs and a younger age at diagnosis. There is variability in screening recommendations across consensus guidelines. Screening adherence is <50% and is lower in persons under the age of 50 years. A provider's recommendation, multiple affected relatives, and family encouragement facilitate screening; insufficient collection of FH, low knowledge of guidelines, and poor family communication are important barriers. Effective interventions incorporate strategies for overcoming barriers, but these have not been broadly tested in clinical settings. Four strategies for reducing CRC in persons with familial risk are suggested: 1) improving the collection and utilization of the FH of cancer, 2) establishing a consensus for screening guidelines by FH, 3) enhancing provider-patient knowledge of guidelines and communication about CRC risk, and 4) encouraging survivors to promote screening within their families and partnering with existing screening programs to expand their reach to high-risk groups. Cancer 2016. © 2016 American Cancer Society. Cancer 2016;122:2633-2645. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

摘要

有结直肠癌(CRC)或腺瘤家族史(FH)但非由已知遗传综合征引起的人群患CRC的风险增加。了解这些风险、筛查建议和筛查行为可为减轻这些家族的CRC负担提供策略依据。我们对过去10年发表的文献进行了全面综述,以评估关于CRC家族史人群的癌症风险、筛查指南、筛查依从性和障碍以及有效干预措施的已知情况,并确定用于识别这些个体并指导护理的FH工具。现有数据表明,有1名受影响的一级亲属(FDR)会使CRC风险增加2倍,且风险会随着多名受影响的FDR以及诊断时年龄较小而增加。不同的共识指南在筛查建议方面存在差异。筛查依从性低于50%,且在50岁以下人群中更低。医生的建议、多名受影响的亲属以及家庭鼓励有助于筛查;FH收集不足、对指南了解不足以及家庭沟通不畅是重要障碍。有效的干预措施纳入了克服障碍的策略,但这些措施尚未在临床环境中广泛测试。建议采取四种降低家族性风险人群CRC的策略:1)改善癌症FH的收集和利用;2)就FH筛查指南达成共识;3)增强医生和患者对指南的了解以及关于CRC风险的沟通;4)鼓励幸存者在其家庭中促进筛查,并与现有筛查项目合作,将其覆盖范围扩大到高危人群。癌症2016。©2016美国癌症协会。癌症2016;122:2633 - 2645。©2016美国癌症协会。

相似文献

3
Effects of Family History on Relative and Absolute Risks for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Dec;17(13):2657-2667.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.09.007. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
5
Increased risk of colorectal neoplasia among family members of patients with colorectal cancer: a population-based study in Utah.
Gastroenterology. 2014 Oct;147(4):814-821.e5; quiz e15-6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
9
10
Use of Family History and Genetic Testing to Determine Risk of Colorectal Cancer.
Gastroenterology. 2020 Jan;158(2):389-403. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.11.029. Epub 2019 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

4
Novel colorectal cancer screening methods - opportunities and challenges.
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2025 Jun 6. doi: 10.1038/s41571-025-01037-7.
6
Gut microbiome differences and disease risk in colorectal cancer relatives and healthy individuals.
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Mar 24;15:1573216. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1573216. eCollection 2025.
10
Comparing Ancestry Standardization Approaches for a Transancestry Colorectal Cancer Polygenic Risk Score.
Genet Epidemiol. 2025 Jan;49(1):e22590. doi: 10.1002/gepi.22590. Epub 2024 Sep 24.

本文引用的文献

1
American Gastroenterological Association Institute Guideline on the Diagnosis and Management of Lynch Syndrome.
Gastroenterology. 2015 Sep;149(3):777-82; quiz e16-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.07.036. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
2
Tailored telephone counseling increases colorectal cancer screening.
Health Educ Res. 2015 Aug;30(4):622-37. doi: 10.1093/her/cyv021. Epub 2015 May 28.
4
5
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Colonoscopic Examination of Individuals With a Family History of Colorectal Cancer.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Aug;13(8):1487-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.02.038. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
6
Awareness and uptake of family screening in patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer at a young age.
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:194931. doi: 10.1155/2015/194931. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
7
ACG clinical guideline: Genetic testing and management of hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb;110(2):223-62; quiz 263. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2014.435. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
8
Sessile serrated polyps: detection, eradication, and prevention of the evil twin.
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar;13(1):156-70. doi: 10.1007/s11938-015-0046-y.
9
Familial colorectal cancer risk by subsite of primary cancer: a population-based study in Utah.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Mar;41(6):573-80. doi: 10.1111/apt.13086. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
10
Family history and the natural history of colorectal cancer: systematic review.
Genet Med. 2015 Sep;17(9):702-12. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.188. Epub 2015 Jan 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验