Suppr超能文献

新生儿复苏:你的学员表现是否如你所想?一项对新生儿医学学员进行的结构化复苏评估的回顾性研究,时间跨度为 8 年。

Neonatal resuscitation: are your trainees performing as you think they are? A retrospective review of a structured resuscitation assessment for neonatal medical trainees over an 8-year period.

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, UK.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012 Jul;97(4):F246-8. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-300548. Epub 2011 Nov 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To ascertain whether Newborn Life Support Course (NLS) accredited trainees could demonstrate resuscitation skills appropriate to their level of training by providing standardised assessments of both junior and senior paediatric trainees during their induction period.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of medical staff resuscitation assessments over an 8-year period from 2003 to 2010.

SETTING

A network-lead tertiary neonatal service with over 11 000 deliveries annually.

PARTICIPANTS

Neonatal medical staff: junior (speciality trainee(ST) of years 1-3) and senior trainees (ST 4-8 with tier 2 on-call responsibilities).

INTERVENTION

A standardised criterion-referenced assessment was performed by two NLS instructors. Junior trainee assessment focused on the basic airway skills learnt on an NLS course. Senior trainees demonstrated resuscitation of a baby with meconium-stained liquor, focusing on advanced life support, including intubation of the mannequin.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Assessment outcomes were pass/fail; fails were categorised as algorithm failure, technical skills failure or both. For trainees who failed the first assessment, the outcome of the second assessment following appropriate feedback was recorded.

RESULTS

Two hundred and sixty-two assessments were performed: 160 junior and 102 senior trainees; 98/160 (61%) of junior and 57/102 (56%) of senior trainees passed their first assessment; 69% of junior trainees who failed the first assessment had a second assessment recorded. There was a 79% pass rate at second assessment; 89% of senior trainees who failed a first assessment had a second assessment recorded. There was an 85% pass rate at second assessment. The majority of trainees who failed an assessment had problems with both the resuscitation algorithm and technical skills.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant numbers of trainees who have been formally trained in neonatal resuscitation skills previously do not pass the standardised resuscitation assessment, thus require an additional input to maintain their competence in neonatal resuscitation.

摘要

目的

通过对初级和高级儿科受训人员在入职期间进行标准化评估,确定新生儿生命支持课程(NLS)认证受训人员是否能够展示与其培训水平相适应的复苏技能。

设计

对 2003 年至 2010 年 8 年间的医护人员复苏评估进行回顾性分析。

设置

拥有每年超过 11000 例分娩的网络主导型三级新生儿服务。

参与者

新生儿医护人员:初级(1-3 年专业受训者(ST))和高级受训者(4-8 年 ST,具有二级随叫随到职责)。

干预措施

由两名 NLS 讲师进行标准化基准参照评估。初级受训者评估侧重于 NLS 课程中学到的基本气道技能。高级受训者演示了羊水胎粪污染婴儿的复苏,重点是高级生命支持,包括对模型的插管。

主要观察指标

评估结果为通过/不通过;失败分为算法失败、技术技能失败或两者兼有。对于首次评估失败的受训者,记录在适当反馈后进行的第二次评估的结果。

结果

共进行了 262 次评估:160 名初级和 102 名高级受训者;98/160(61%)名初级和 57/102(56%)名高级受训者通过了第一次评估;69%的首次评估失败的初级受训者有第二次评估记录。第二次评估的通过率为 79%;89%的首次评估失败的高级受训者有第二次评估记录。第二次评估的通过率为 85%。大多数评估失败的受训者在复苏算法和技术技能方面都存在问题。

结论

许多以前接受过新生儿复苏技能正规培训的受训人员未能通过标准化复苏评估,因此需要额外的投入来保持他们在新生儿复苏方面的能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验