Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College, 500 College Avenue, Swarthmore, PA 19081, USA.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Mar;38(2):295-311. doi: 10.1037/a0025862. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
Are processes of figurative comparison and figurative categorization different? An experiment combining alternative-sense and matched-sense metaphor priming with a divided visual field assessment technique sought to isolate processes of comparison and categorization in the 2 cerebral hemispheres. For target metaphors presented in the right visual field/left cerebral hemisphere (RVF/LH), only matched-sense primes were facilitative. Literal primes and alternative-sense primes had no effect on comprehension time compared to the unprimed baseline. The effects of matched-sense primes were additive with the rated conventionality of the targets. For target metaphors presented to the left visual field/right cerebral hemisphere (LVF/RH), matched-sense primes were again additively facilitative. However, alternative-sense primes, though facilitative overall, seemed to eliminate the preexisting advantages of conventional target metaphor senses in the LVF/RH in favor of metaphoric senses similar to those of the primes. These findings are consistent with tightly controlled categorical coding in the LH and coarse, flexible, context-dependent coding in the RH.
比喻的比较和分类过程是否不同?一项结合了替代意义和匹配意义隐喻启动以及分视评估技术的实验旨在分离大脑两个半球中的比较和分类过程。对于呈现在右视野/左半球(RVF/LH)的目标隐喻,只有匹配意义的启动词才是促进性的。与未启动的基线相比,字面意义的启动词和替代意义的启动词对理解时间没有影响。匹配意义的启动词与目标的常规性评价呈相加效应。对于呈现在左视野/右半球(LVF/RH)的目标隐喻,匹配意义的启动词再次具有相加的促进作用。然而,替代意义的启动词虽然总体上是促进性的,但似乎消除了在 LVF/RH 中常规目标隐喻意义的预先存在的优势,而倾向于与启动词相似的隐喻意义。这些发现与左半球中严格控制的类别编码和右半球中粗糙、灵活、依赖上下文的编码一致。