Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 May 1;83(1):340-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.070. Epub 2011 Nov 19.
Several surgical series have identified subcarinal, contralateral, and multilevel nodal involvement as predictors of poor overall survival in patients with Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with definitive resection. This retrospective study evaluates the impact of extent and location of mediastinal lymph node (LN) involvement on survival in patients with Stage III NSCLC treated with definitive radiotherapy.
We analyzed 106 consecutive patients with T1-4 N2-3 Stage III NSCLC treated with definitive radiotherapy at the University of Pennsylvania between January 2003 and February 2009. For this analysis, mediastinal LN stations were divided into four mutually exclusive groups: supraclavicular, ipsilateral mediastinum, contralateral mediastinum, and subcarinal. Patients' conditions were then analyzed according to the extent of involvement and location of mediastinal LN stations.
The majority (88%) of patients received sequential or concurrent chemotherapy. The median follow-up time for survivors was 32.6 months. By multivariable Cox modeling, chemotherapy use (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.21 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.07-0.63]) was associated with improved overall survival. Increasing primary tumor [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose avidity (HR: 1.11 [CI: 1.06-1.19]), and subcarinal involvement (HR: 2.29 [CI: 1.11-4.73]) were significant negative predictors of overall survival. On univariate analysis, contralateral nodal involvement (HR: 0.70 [CI: 0.33-1.47]), supraclavicular nodal involvement (HR: 0.78 [CI: 0.38-1.67]), multilevel nodal involvement (HR: 0.97 [CI: 0.58-1.61]), and tumor size (HR: 1.04 [CI: 0.94-1.14]) did not predict for overall survival. Patients with subcarinal involvement also had lower rates of 2-year nodal control (51.2% vs. 74.9%, p = 0.047) and 2-year distant control (28.4% vs. 61.2%, p = 0.043).
These data suggest that the factors that determine oncologic outcome in Stage III NSCLC patients treated with definitive radiotherapy are distinct from those observed in patients who undergo surgical resection. The ultimate efficacy of radiation in locally advanced NSCLC is dependent on the intrinsic biology of the tumor.
几项外科手术系列研究已经确定,在接受根治性切除术的 III 期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中,肺门旁、对侧和多水平淋巴结受累是总生存的不良预测因素。本回顾性研究评估了在宾夕法尼亚大学接受根治性放疗的 III 期 NSCLC 患者中,纵隔淋巴结(LN)受累程度和位置对生存的影响。
我们分析了 2003 年 1 月至 2009 年 2 月期间在宾夕法尼亚大学接受根治性放疗的 106 例 T1-4 N2-3 III 期 NSCLC 连续患者。在此分析中,将纵隔 LN 站分为四个互斥组:锁骨上、同侧纵隔、对侧纵隔和肺门旁。然后根据纵隔 LN 站受累程度和位置分析患者情况。
大多数(88%)患者接受了序贯或同步化疗。幸存者的中位随访时间为 32.6 个月。多变量 Cox 模型表明,化疗的使用(风险比[HR]:0.21 [95%置信区间(CI):0.07-0.63])与总体生存改善相关。原发肿瘤[18F]-氟-2-脱氧葡萄糖摄取率增加(HR:1.11 [CI:1.06-1.19])和肺门旁受累(HR:2.29 [CI:1.11-4.73])是总体生存的显著负预测因素。单变量分析显示,对侧淋巴结受累(HR:0.70 [CI:0.33-1.47])、锁骨上淋巴结受累(HR:0.78 [CI:0.38-1.67])、多水平淋巴结受累(HR:0.97 [CI:0.58-1.61])和肿瘤大小(HR:1.04 [CI:0.94-1.14])均不能预测总体生存。肺门旁受累患者的 2 年淋巴结控制率(51.2% vs. 74.9%,p = 0.047)和 2 年远处控制率(28.4% vs. 61.2%,p = 0.043)也较低。
这些数据表明,决定接受根治性放疗的 III 期 NSCLC 患者肿瘤学结局的因素与接受手术切除的患者不同。局部晚期 NSCLC 中放疗的最终疗效取决于肿瘤的内在生物学特性。