• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甲型H1N1流感大流行期间猪流感及检疫措施对患者和家庭的影响。

Impact of swine influenza and quarantine measures on patients and households during the H1N1/09 pandemic.

作者信息

Teh Benjamin, Olsen Karen, Black Jim, Cheng Allen C, Aboltins Craig, Bull Kirstin, Johnson Paul D R, Grayson M Lindsay, Torresi Joseph

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Scand J Infect Dis. 2012 Apr;44(4):289-96. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2011.631572. Epub 2011 Nov 22.

DOI:10.3109/00365548.2011.631572
PMID:22106922
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the secondary attack rates (SAR) and impact of the 2009 H1N1 epidemic in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, and the measures implemented to control household transmission.

METHODS

Patients with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed influenza A and pandemic H1N1 (pH1N1) were identified from hospital and microbiology laboratory records and asked to take part in a retrospective survey. Information obtained included: the constellation of symptoms, contact history, secondary infection, and household information, including adherence and attitudes towards quarantine measures.

RESULTS

The overall SAR of pH1N1 index patients was 30.6%, but a significantly lower SAR was noted with oseltamivir treatment (36.6% vs 22.8%, p < 0.05). The greatest reduction in SAR was observed when index patients aged 0-4 y received oseltamivir (83.3% vs 22.2%, p < 0.01). Quarantine was requested of 65.8% of patients and 92.8% self-reported adhering to recommendations. pH1N1 index patients, the number of median days bed-bound is 2.5 days, being unable or too sick to work for a median of 5.0 days, and lost a median of 7.0 days of work for reasons related to an influenza-like illness.

CONCLUSIONS

The pH1N1 influenza pandemic had a significant clinical impact on households. Public health interventions such as oseltamivir treatment of index cases were beneficial in reducing secondary attack rates, whilst quarantine measures were found to have high rates of self-reported compliance, understanding, and acceptability.

摘要

目的

评估2009年甲型H1N1流感在澳大利亚维多利亚州墨尔本的二代发病率(SAR)及其影响,以及为控制家庭传播而采取的措施。

方法

从医院和微生物实验室记录中识别出经聚合酶链反应确诊的甲型流感和大流行性H1N1(pH1N1)患者,并邀请他们参加一项回顾性调查。获得的信息包括:症状群、接触史、继发感染以及家庭信息,包括对检疫措施的依从性和态度。

结果

pH1N1指数病例的总体二代发病率为30.6%,但接受奥司他韦治疗的二代发病率显著较低(36.6%对22.8%,p<0.05)。当0 - 4岁的指数病例接受奥司他韦治疗时,二代发病率下降最为显著(83.3%对22.2%,p<0.01)。65.8%的患者被要求进行检疫,92.8%的患者自我报告遵守了建议。pH1N1指数病例卧床的中位天数为2.5天,因无法工作或病情过重而无法工作的中位天数为5.0天,因流感样疾病相关原因损失的工作中位天数为7.0天。

结论

pH1N1流感大流行对家庭产生了重大临床影响。对指数病例进行奥司他韦治疗等公共卫生干预措施有助于降低二代发病率,同时发现检疫措施的自我报告依从率、理解率和接受率较高。

相似文献

1
Impact of swine influenza and quarantine measures on patients and households during the H1N1/09 pandemic.甲型H1N1流感大流行期间猪流感及检疫措施对患者和家庭的影响。
Scand J Infect Dis. 2012 Apr;44(4):289-96. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2011.631572. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
2
Serologically confirmed household transmission of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus during the first pandemic wave--New York City, April-May 2009.血清学确诊的 2009 年大流行流感 A(H1N1)病毒在第一波大流行期间的家庭传播——纽约市,2009 年 4 月至 5 月。
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Sep;53(5):455-62. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir437.
3
Secondary attack rate of pandemic influenza A(H1N1) 2009 in Western Australian households, 29 May-7 August 2009.2009 年 5 月 29 日至 8 月 7 日,西澳大利亚州家庭中甲型 H1N1 流感大流行的二次发病率。
Euro Surveill. 2011 Jan 20;16(3):19765.
4
Household transmission of the 2009 pandemic A/H1N1 influenza virus: elevated laboratory‐confirmed secondary attack rates and evidence of asymptomatic infections.家庭传播 2009 年大流行 A/H1N1 流感病毒:实验室确诊的二次攻击率升高和无症状感染的证据。
Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Nov 1;51(9):1033-41. doi: 10.1086/656582.
5
Sources, perceived usefulness and understanding of information disseminated to families who entered home quarantine during the H1N1 pandemic in Victoria, Australia: a cross-sectional study.澳大利亚维多利亚州甲型 H1N1 流感大流行期间实施家庭隔离的家庭对信息来源、感知有用性和理解程度的调查:一项横断面研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2011 Jan 4;11:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-2.
6
Household transmission of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) and nonpharmaceutical interventions among households of high school students in San Antonio, Texas.德克萨斯州圣安东尼奥市高中生家庭中 2009 年甲型 H1N1 流感的家庭传播和非药物干预措施。
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Jan 1;52 Suppl 1:S146-53. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq057.
7
Clinical features of the initial cases of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus infection in China.中国 2009 年甲型 H1N1 流感大流行病毒感染初始病例的临床特征。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 24;361(26):2507-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0906612. Epub 2009 Dec 9.
8
Household transmission of 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus after a school-based outbreak in New York City, April-May 2009.2009 年甲型 H1N1 流感病毒在纽约市基于学校的暴发后的家庭传播,2009 年 4 月至 5 月。
J Infect Dis. 2010 Apr 1;201(7):984-92. doi: 10.1086/651145.
9
Risk factors for laboratory-confirmed household transmission of pandemic H1N1 2009 infection.人感染甲型 H1N1 流感病毒 2009 株家庭聚集性病例的危险因素分析。
Am J Infect Control. 2010 Dec;38(10):e43-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.05.017.
10
Nosocomial vs community-acquired pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009: a nested case-control study.医院获得性与社区获得性 2009 年甲型 H1N1 流感:巢式病例对照研究。
J Hosp Infect. 2012 Oct;82(2):94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2012.07.006. Epub 2012 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Did mpox knowledge, attitudes and beliefs affect intended behaviour in the general population and men who are gay, bisexual and who have sex with men? An online cross-sectional survey in the UK.在英国进行的一项在线横断面调查:猴痘知识、态度和信念是否会影响普通人群和男同性恋、双性恋以及与男性发生性关系的男性的预期行为?
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 12;13(10):e070882. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070882.
2
Factors influencing physical distancing compliance among young adults during COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia: A photovoice mixed methods study.印度尼西亚新冠疫情期间影响年轻人遵守物理距离规定的因素:一项摄影发声混合方法研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Jan 13;2(1):e0000035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000035. eCollection 2022.
3
Ability and willingness to work during COVID-19 pandemic:Perspectives of front-line hotel employees.
新冠疫情期间的工作能力与意愿:一线酒店员工的观点
Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 Feb;93:102770. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102770. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
4
Stay-at-home orders during COVID-19 pandemic: an experience from general population in Damietta Governorate, Egypt.新冠疫情期间的居家令:埃及达米埃塔省普通民众的经历
J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2022 Oct 3;97(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s42506-022-00115-3.
5
Quarantine preparedness - the missing factor in COVID-19 behaviour change? Qualitative insights from Australia.隔离准备——在 COVID-19 行为改变中缺失的因素?来自澳大利亚的定性见解。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Sep 23;22(1):1806. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14185-7.
6
Trust in Institutions and the COVID-19 Threat: A Cross-Sectional Study on the Public Perception of Official Recommendations and of Othering in Switzerland.信任机构与新冠疫情威胁:瑞士公众对官方建议与“他者化”认知的横断面研究。
Int J Public Health. 2022 Jan 10;66:1604223. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2021.1604223. eCollection 2021.
7
How Much Money Should be Paid for a Patient to Isolate During the COVID-19 Outbreak? A Discrete Choice Experiment in Iran.在 COVID-19 疫情期间,应该为患者隔离支付多少钱?伊朗的一项离散选择实验。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Sep;19(5):709-719. doi: 10.1007/s40258-021-00671-3. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
8
Self-Isolation and Quarantine during the UK's First Wave of COVID-19. A Mixed-Methods Study of Non-Adherence.英国第一波 COVID-19 期间的自我隔离和检疫。不遵守规定的混合方法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 30;18(13):7015. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137015.
9
Emotional Attitudes of Chinese Citizens on Social Distancing During the COVID-19 Outbreak: Analysis of Social Media Data.新冠疫情期间中国公民对社交距离的情绪态度:基于社交媒体数据的分析
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Mar 16;9(3):e27079. doi: 10.2196/27079.
10
The COVID-19 Symptom to Isolation Cascade in a Latinx Community: A Call to Action.拉丁裔社区中新冠病毒疾病症状至隔离的连锁反应:行动呼吁
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 20;8(2):ofab023. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab023. eCollection 2021 Feb.