Agar John W M, Hawley Carmel M, Kerr Peter G
Department of Renal Medicine, Geelong Hospital, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.
Semin Dial. 2011 Nov-Dec;24(6):658-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2011.00992.x. Epub 2011 Nov 22.
After early strong support, home hemodialysis (HHD) has all but disappeared as a viable modality in most western countries--except in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ), where a mean 12.9% of all HD (June 2010) is home-based. The reasons for this unique difference are neither demographic nor geographic; rather, they result from a strong belief held by ANZ nephrologists, nurses, and funding agencies in the clinical outcome and economic benefits of HHD. This "hemodialysis is best at home" approach has permitted ANZ programs to take full advantage of a renewed interest in extended hour and higher frequency dialysis. This article explores the reasons for the success of HHD in this region.
在早期得到大力支持之后,家庭血液透析(HHD)在大多数西方国家几乎已不再是一种可行的治疗方式——澳大利亚和新西兰(ANZ)除外,在那里,2010年6月所有血液透析(HD)病例中有12.9%是在家中进行的。造成这种独特差异的原因既不是人口统计学因素,也不是地理因素;相反,是澳大利亚和新西兰的肾病学家、护士以及资助机构坚信家庭血液透析的临床效果和经济效益。这种“血液透析在家中进行最佳”的方法使澳大利亚和新西兰的项目能够充分利用人们对延长透析时间和增加透析频率重新产生的兴趣。本文探讨了该地区家庭血液透析成功的原因。