• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哮喘控制测试评估:疾病稳定性的可靠决定因素,也是未来加重的预测指标。

Evaluation of the asthma control test: a reliable determinant of disease stability and a predictor of future exacerbations.

机构信息

Departments of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Respirology. 2012 Feb;17(2):370-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.02105.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.02105.x
PMID:22107482
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the asthma control test (ACT) cut-off values for asthma control according to the Global Initiative for Asthma guideline in adults and the effectiveness of ACT scores in predicting exacerbations and serial changes in ACT scores over time in relation to treatment decisions.

METHODS

Subjects completed ACT together with same-day spirometry and fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measurement at baseline and at 3 months. Physicians, blinded to the ACT scores and FeNO values, assessed the patient's asthma control in the past month and adjusted the asthma medications according to management guidelines. Asthma exacerbations and urgent health-care utilization (HCU) at 6 months were recorded.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy-nine (120 men) asthmatics completed the study. The ACT cut-off for uncontrolled and partly controlled asthma were ≤19 (sensitivity 0.74, specificity 0.67, % correctly classified 69.5) and ≤22, respectively (sensitivity 0.73, specificity 0.71, % correctly classified 72.1). Baseline ACT score had an odds ratio of 2.34 (95% confidence interval: 1.48-3.69) and 2.66 (1.70-4.18) for urgent HCU and exacerbations, respectively, at 6 months (P < 0.0001). However, baseline FeNO and spirometry values had no association with urgent HCU and exacerbations. The 3-month ACT score of ≤20 correlated best with step-up of asthma medications (sensitivity 0.65, specificity 0.81, % correctly classified 72.8). For serial changes of ACT scores over 3 months, the cut-off value was best at ≤3 for treatment decisions with low sensitivity (0.23) and % correctly classified (57.3%) values.

CONCLUSIONS

Single measurement of ACT is useful for assessing asthma control, prediction of exacerbation and changes in treatment decisions.

摘要

背景和目的

本研究评估了成人哮喘全球倡议指南中哮喘控制测试(ACT)的截断值,以及 ACT 评分在预测 6 个月时哮喘恶化和 ACT 评分随时间变化方面的有效性,以评估治疗决策。

方法

受试者在基线和 3 个月时同时完成 ACT 以及当日的肺活量测定和呼出一氧化氮(FeNO)浓度测定。医生根据管理指南,在不知道 ACT 评分和 FeNO 值的情况下,评估患者过去一个月的哮喘控制情况,并调整哮喘药物。记录 6 个月时的哮喘恶化和紧急医疗保健利用(HCU)。

结果

379 名(120 名男性)哮喘患者完成了研究。未控制和部分控制哮喘的 ACT 截断值分别为≤19(敏感性 0.74,特异性 0.67,分类正确率为 69.5%)和≤22(敏感性 0.73,特异性 0.71,分类正确率为 72.1%)。基线 ACT 评分与 6 个月时的紧急 HCU 和恶化分别具有 2.34(95%置信区间:1.48-3.69)和 2.66(1.70-4.18)的优势比(P<0.0001)。然而,基线 FeNO 和肺活量值与紧急 HCU 和恶化无关。3 个月时的 ACT 评分≤20 与哮喘药物升级最相关(敏感性 0.65,特异性 0.81,分类正确率为 72.8%)。对于 3 个月内 ACT 评分的变化,最佳截断值为≤3,治疗决策的敏感性较低(0.23),分类正确率(57.3%)。

结论

单次测量 ACT 可用于评估哮喘控制、预测恶化和改变治疗决策。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the asthma control test: a reliable determinant of disease stability and a predictor of future exacerbations.哮喘控制测试评估:疾病稳定性的可靠决定因素,也是未来加重的预测指标。
Respirology. 2012 Feb;17(2):370-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.02105.x.
2
[Comparison of the Asthma Control Test (ACT) with lung function, levels of exhaled nitric oxide and control according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA)].[哮喘控制测试(ACT)与肺功能、呼出气一氧化氮水平以及根据全球哮喘防治创议(GINA)的控制情况的比较]
Arch Bronconeumol. 2010 Jul;46(7):370-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2010.04.003.
3
Asthma Control Test correlates well with the treatment decisions made by asthma specialists.哮喘控制测试与哮喘专科医生做出的治疗决策具有良好的相关性。
Respirology. 2009 May;14(4):559-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2009.01514.x. Epub 2009 Mar 25.
4
The strategy for predicting future exacerbation of asthma using a combination of the Asthma Control Test and lung function test.使用哮喘控制测试和肺功能测试相结合的方法预测哮喘未来加重情况的策略。
J Asthma. 2009 Sep;46(7):677-82. doi: 10.1080/02770900902972160.
5
Identifying uncontrolled asthma in children with the childhood asthma control test or exhaled nitric oxide measurement.使用儿童哮喘控制测试或呼出气一氧化氮测量来识别儿童未控制的哮喘。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012 Jul;109(1):36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2012.05.011. Epub 2012 May 31.
6
Asthma control test is correlated to FEV1 and nitric oxide in Greek asthmatic patients: influence of treatment.哮喘控制测试与希腊哮喘患者的第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)和一氧化氮相关:治疗的影响。
J Asthma. 2011 Nov;48(9):901-6. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2011.611958. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
7
Predicting changes in clinical status of young asthmatics: clinical scores or objective parameters?预测年轻哮喘患者临床状态的变化:临床评分还是客观参数?
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2009 May;44(5):442-9. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20977.
8
Association of asthma education with asthma control evaluated by asthma control test, FEV1, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide.通过哮喘控制测试、第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)和呼出一氧化氮分数评估哮喘教育与哮喘控制的相关性。
J Asthma. 2013 Feb;50(1):97-102. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2012.741638. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
9
Role of spirometry and exhaled nitric oxide to predict exacerbations in treated asthmatics.肺量计和呼出一氧化氮在预测接受治疗的哮喘患者病情加重中的作用。
Chest. 2006 Jun;129(6):1492-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.6.1492.
10
Discrepancy between clinical asthma control assessment tools and fractional exhaled nitric oxide.临床哮喘控制评估工具与呼出一氧化氮分数之间的差异。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Aug;101(2):124-9. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60199-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Detection of Inadequately Controlled Asthma in Adults Using Impulse Oscillometry and Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide.使用脉冲振荡法和呼出一氧化氮分数检测成人哮喘控制不佳情况
J Asthma Allergy. 2025 Apr 25;18:637-647. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S516257. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinical remission of mild-to-moderate asthma: Rates, contributing factors, and stability.轻度至中度哮喘的临床缓解:发生率、影响因素及稳定性
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2025 Jan 30;4(2):100431. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2025.100431. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Differences in the effectiveness of single, dual, and triple inhaled corticosteroid therapy for reducing future risk of severe asthma exacerbation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
单药、双联和三联吸入性糖皮质激素疗法在降低重度哮喘加重未来风险方面的疗效差异:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。
Heliyon. 2024 May 16;10(12):e31186. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31186. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
4
Psychometric Properties of the Short Scale Anxiety Sensitivity Index Among Adults with Chronic Respiratory Disease.慢性呼吸道疾病成人中短版焦虑敏感性指数的心理测量特性
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2024 Mar;31(1):186-196. doi: 10.1007/s10880-023-09976-y. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
5
Relationship Between Asthma Control Status and Health-Related Quality of Life in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study.中日哮喘控制状况与健康相关生活质量的关系:一项横断面混合方法研究。
Adv Ther. 2023 Nov;40(11):4857-4876. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02660-5. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
6
Suboptimally controlled asthma in patients treated with inhaled ICS/LABA: prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes.吸入性 ICS/LABA 治疗患者中哮喘控制不佳:流行率、风险因素和结局。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2023 May 8;33(1):19. doi: 10.1038/s41533-023-00336-9.
7
How to step down asthma preventer treatment in patients with well-controlled asthma - more is not always better.哮喘控制良好的患者如何逐步减少哮喘预防药物治疗——并非越多越好。
Aust Prescr. 2022 Aug;45(4):125-129. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2022.033. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
8
Phenotype-Guided Asthma Therapy: An Alternative Approach to Guidelines.基于表型的哮喘治疗:指南的另一种方法
J Asthma Allergy. 2021 Mar 12;14:207-217. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S266999. eCollection 2021.
9
2020 Focused Updates to the Asthma Management Guidelines: A Report from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program Coordinating Committee Expert Panel Working Group.2020 年哮喘管理指南重点更新:国家哮喘教育和预防计划协调委员会专家小组工作组的报告。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Dec;146(6):1217-1270. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.10.003.
10
A Proposed Approach to Chronic Airway Disease (CAD) Using Therapeutic Goals and Treatable Traits: A Look to the Future.采用治疗目标和可治疗特征的慢性气道疾病(CAD)治疗方法:展望未来。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Sep 4;15:2091-2100. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S263430. eCollection 2020.