Suppr超能文献

传统腹腔镜手术与单孔腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的短期疗效比较。

The short-term outcomes of conventional and single-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Daejeon St Mary's Hospital, the Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2011 Dec;254(6):933-40. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318237826b.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to show the safety and feasibility of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) by comparing its short-term outcomes with those following conventional laparoscopic surgery.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Single-port laparoscopic surgery maximizes the advantages of laparoscopic surgery, and therefore it can be an ultimate attainment of laparoscopic surgery. However, no comparative study has addressed its role in colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Prospectively collected data of patients who had undergone either conventional laparoscopic surgery (n = 106) or SPLS (n = 73) for colorectal cancer between March 2006 and May 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. The short-term outcomes of these 2 operative modalities were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 179 study subjects, 103 (57.5%) had colon cancer and 76 (42.5%) had rectal cancer. Various operative methods, from right hemicolectomy to abdominoperineal resection, were used according to location through either conventional laparoscopic or SPLS approach. In its comparison, mean surgical time was greater in the SPLS group (255 vs 276 minutes, P < 0.008). Acquired length of sufficient surgical margins and the number of harvested lymph nodes were comparable. Postoperative recovery was faster in the SPLS group, in terms of shorter time duration before first flatus (SPLS vs conventional laparoscopic surgery; 2.5 ± 1.2 vs 3.2 ± 1.8 days, P = 0.004), earlier initiation of free oral fluids (1.8 ± 2.2 vs 2.6 ± 1.7 days, P = 0.000) and of a solid diet (4.2 ± 2.9 vs 6.5 ± 2.7 days, P = 0.000), less frequent usage of parenteral narcotics (2.2 ± 3.2 vs 3.5 ± 4.0 times, P = 0.029), and shorter hospital stay (9.6 ± 9.6 vs 15.5 ± 9.8 days, P = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that SPLS is both safe and feasible in colorectal cancer, and that it has equivalent or better short-term outcomes than conventional laparoscopic surgery. Accordingly, the authors conclude that SPLS can be an alternative to conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过比较单孔腹腔镜手术(SPLS)与传统腹腔镜手术的短期结果,展示 SPLS 的安全性和可行性。

背景资料概要

SPLS 最大限度地发挥了腹腔镜手术的优势,因此它可以作为腹腔镜手术的终极目标。然而,尚无研究比较 SPLS 在结直肠癌中的作用。

方法

回顾性分析 2006 年 3 月至 2010 年 5 月期间接受传统腹腔镜手术(n = 106)或 SPLS(n = 73)治疗结直肠癌的患者的前瞻性收集数据。比较这两种手术方式的短期结果。

结果

179 例研究对象中,103 例(57.5%)为结肠癌,76 例(42.5%)为直肠癌。根据部位,通过传统腹腔镜或 SPLS 入路,采用各种手术方法,从右半结肠切除术到腹会阴联合切除术。在比较中,SPLS 组的手术时间更长(255 比 276 分钟,P < 0.008)。获得的足够手术切缘长度和采集的淋巴结数量相当。SPLS 组术后恢复更快,首次排气前时间(SPLS 比传统腹腔镜手术;2.5 ± 1.2 比 3.2 ± 1.8 天,P = 0.004)、开始自由口服液体(1.8 ± 2.2 比 2.6 ± 1.7 天,P = 0.000)和固体饮食(4.2 ± 2.9 比 6.5 ± 2.7 天,P = 0.000)更早,使用静脉内麻醉药物的频率更低(2.2 ± 3.2 比 3.5 ± 4.0 次,P = 0.029),住院时间更短(9.6 ± 9.6 比 15.5 ± 9.8 天,P = 0.000)。

结论

本研究表明,SPLS 治疗结直肠癌安全可行,短期结果与传统腹腔镜手术相当或更好。因此,作者得出结论,SPLS 可以作为结直肠癌的传统腹腔镜手术的替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验