• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术:前 100 例切除。

Single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: the first 100 resections.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Feb;55(2):134-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823c0ae4.

DOI:10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823c0ae4
PMID:22228155
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Single-port laparoscopy remains a novel technique in the field of colorectal surgery. Several small series have examined its safety for colon resection.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to analyze our entire experience and short-term outcomes with single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy since its introduction at our institution. We assert that this approach is feasible and safe for the wide array of patients and indications encountered by a colorectal surgeon.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively gathered data for all patients who underwent single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with the use of standard laparoscopic instrumentation, for malignant or benign disease, between July 2009 and November 2010 in a high-volume, academic, colorectal surgery practice.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Demographic, clinical, operative, and pathologic factors were reviewed and analyzed. All conversions to conventional laparoscopic or open operations were considered in this analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred patients underwent single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy during the study period. Mean age was 63 years, and 61% of the patients were men. Forty-three percent had undergone previous abdominal surgery, and the median body mass index was 26 (range, 18-46). Median ASA classification was 3 (range, 1-4). Five percent of the operations were performed urgently, and 56% were performed for carcinoma, of which half were T3 or T4 tumor stage. Median operative duration was 105 (range, 64-270) minutes. Mean and median blood loss was 106 and 50 mL. Two percent required conversion to multiport laparoscopy, and 4% converted to the open approach. Median postoperative stay was 4 (range, 2-48) days. Median lymph node number was 18 (range, 11-42). There was one mortality in this series. Morbidity, including wound infection, was 13%.

CONCLUSIONS

This represents the largest experience with single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy to date. This technique was used with acceptable morbidity and mortality and without compromise of conventional oncologic parameters by colorectal surgeons experienced in minimally invasive technique. These findings support the use of a single-port approach for patients requiring right hemicolectomy.

摘要

背景

单孔腹腔镜仍然是结直肠外科领域的一项新技术。有几个小系列研究检查了其用于结肠切除术的安全性。

目的

我们旨在分析自我院开展以来,单孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的全部经验和短期结果。我们认为,对于结直肠外科医生遇到的广泛的患者和适应证,这种方法是可行且安全的。

设计

这是对 2009 年 7 月至 2010 年 11 月期间,在一家高容量的学术性结直肠外科手术实践中,使用标准腹腔镜器械对因恶性或良性疾病而接受单孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的所有患者的前瞻性采集数据进行的回顾性分析。

主要观察指标

回顾和分析了人口统计学、临床、手术和病理因素。所有转换为常规腹腔镜或开放手术的情况均包括在本分析中。

结果

研究期间共有 100 例患者接受了单孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术。平均年龄为 63 岁,61%的患者为男性。43%的患者曾接受过腹部手术,中位数体重指数为 26(范围 18-46)。中位数美国麻醉师协会(ASA)分级为 3 级(范围 1-4 级)。5%的手术为紧急手术,56%的手术为癌,其中一半为 T3 或 T4 肿瘤分期。中位手术时间为 105 分钟(范围 64-270 分钟)。平均和中位数出血量分别为 106 和 50 毫升。2%的患者需要转换为多孔腹腔镜,4%的患者转为开放手术。中位术后住院时间为 4 天(范围 2-48 天)。中位数淋巴结数量为 18 个(范围 11-42 个)。本系列中有 1 例死亡。包括伤口感染在内的发病率为 13%。

结论

这是目前为止关于单孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的最大经验总结。该技术由经验丰富的微创技术结直肠外科医生使用,具有可接受的发病率和死亡率,并且不会影响常规肿瘤学参数。这些发现支持为需要右半结肠切除术的患者使用单孔方法。

相似文献

1
Single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: the first 100 resections.单孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术:前 100 例切除。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Feb;55(2):134-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823c0ae4.
2
Single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a safe alternative to conventional laparoscopy.单孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术:传统腹腔镜的安全替代方法。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Nov;53(11):1467-72. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181f23ca0.
3
Utility and short-term outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a single-institution experience in 1103 patients.手助腹腔镜结直肠手术的实用性和短期结果:单中心 1103 例经验。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Sep;54(9):1076-81. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3182155904.
4
[Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis. Technical aspects and personal experience].[腹腔镜右半结肠切除术伴体内吻合术。技术要点及个人经验]
Minerva Chir. 2003 Aug;58(4):621-7.
5
Clinical outcome of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with transvaginal resection, anastomosis, and retrieval of specimen.经阴道切除、吻合和取出标本的腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的临床结果。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2010 Nov;53(11):1473-9. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181f1cc17.
6
Laparoscopic versus open hemicolectomy.腹腔镜与开放半结肠切除术
Minerva Chir. 2003 Aug;58(4):491-502, 502-7.
7
Single port laparoscopic right colonic resection using a 'vessel-first' approach.经端口腹腔镜右半结肠切除术采用“血管优先”方法。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Sep;14(9):1138-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02898.x.
8
Single-incision right hemicolectomy for malignancy: a feasible technique with standard laparoscopic instrumentation.单孔右半结肠切除术治疗恶性肿瘤:一种使用标准腹腔镜器械可行的技术。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Nov;14(11):e764-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03175.x.
9
Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic assisted right colectomy for cancer.全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助右半结肠癌根治术的比较。
Int J Surg. 2012;10(6):290-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.04.020. Epub 2012 May 4.
10
Laparoscopic medial-to-lateral approach for the curative resection of right-sided colon cancer.腹腔镜由内侧向外侧入路治疗右侧结肠癌根治术
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Jun;14(6):1878-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9153-2. Epub 2007 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
European association for endoscopic surgery (EAES) consensus statement on single-incision endoscopic surgery.欧洲内镜外科学会(EAES)关于单切口内镜手术的共识声明。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Apr;33(4):996-1019. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06693-2. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
2
Comparison of single-port and conventional laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection.单孔与传统腹腔镜腹会阴联合切除术的比较。
J Minim Access Surg. 2018 Jan-Mar;14(1):27-32. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_38_17.
3
Short-Term Outcomes of Single-Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Diseases: Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Prospective Evidence.
单切口与传统腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠疾病的短期疗效比较:随机和前瞻性证据的荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Nov;21(11):1931-1945. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3520-0. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
4
Single-Incision Laparoscopic Right Hemi-Colectomy: a Systematic Review.单孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术:一项系统评价
Indian J Surg. 2015 Aug;77(4):301-12. doi: 10.1007/s12262-015-1282-z. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
5
Single-incision (with multi-input single-port) laparoscopic colorectal procedures: Early results.单切口(多通道单孔)腹腔镜结直肠手术:早期结果
Ulus Cerrahi Derg. 2013 Sep 1;29(3):119-23. doi: 10.5152/UCD.2013.2351. eCollection 2013.
6
New trends in colorectal surgery: single port and natural orifice techniques.结直肠手术的新趋势:单孔和自然腔道技术。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 28;20(48):18104-20. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i48.18104.
7
A randomized pilot study on single-port versus conventional laparoscopic rectal surgery: effects on postoperative pain and the stress response to surgery.单孔与传统腹腔镜直肠手术的随机对照试验研究:对术后疼痛及手术应激反应的影响
Tech Coloproctol. 2015 Jan;19(1):11-22. doi: 10.1007/s10151-014-1237-6. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
8
Analysis of outcomes for single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) right colectomy reveals a minimal learning curve.单切口腹腔镜手术(SILS)右半结肠切除术的疗效分析显示其学习曲线很短。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jun;29(6):1356-62. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3803-4. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
9
Single-site laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease.炎症性肠病的单孔腹腔镜手术
JSLS. 2014 Apr-Jun;18(2):258-64. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13753907292872.
10
Single-incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer: state of art.单切口腹腔镜结直肠癌手术:现状
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 May 28;20(20):6073-80. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.6073.