Suppr超能文献

与开放填塞相比,真空辅助闭合胸骨切开术后纵隔炎

Vacuum-assisted closure of post-sternotomy mediastinitis as compared to open packing.

作者信息

Vos Roemer J, Yilmaz Alaaddin, Sonker Uday, Kelder Johannes C, Kloppenburg Geoffrey T L

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Jan;14(1):17-21. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivr049. Epub 2011 Nov 16.

Abstract

Post-sternotomy mediastinitis is a rare but serious complication of cardiac surgery leading to prolonged hospital stay and higher mortality. In the last decades several treatment modalities have been described, of which vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) shows the most promising results. The aim of this study is to describe clinical outcomes of VAC as compared to open packing and to predict risk factors for mortality. We performed a retrospective analysis of 113 patients with mediastinitis undergoing VAC (n = 89) or open packing (n = 24) between January 2000 and July 2010. Patient characteristics, risk factors and procedure-related variables were analysed. C-reactive protein and leukocyte counts were determined on admission and at regular intervals during hospital stay. We compared length of treatment, treatment failure, hospital stay and mortality. We also analysed risk factors predicting mortality. In-hospital mortality in the VAC group was 12.4% compared to 41.7% in the conventional group (P = 0.0032). Intensive care stay was 6.8 ± 14.4 days with VAC therapy compared to 18.5 ± 21.0 days with open packing (P = 0.0081). Significant risk factors for mortality were pre-operative renal failure and obesity. Our findings indicate that VAC therapy is superior to open packing, resulting in shorter intensive care stay and improved survival.

摘要

胸骨切开术后纵隔炎是心脏手术中一种罕见但严重的并发症,会导致住院时间延长和死亡率升高。在过去几十年里,已经描述了几种治疗方式,其中负压封闭引流(VAC)显示出最有前景的效果。本研究的目的是描述与开放填塞相比,VAC的临床结果,并预测死亡的危险因素。我们对2000年1月至2010年7月期间113例患有纵隔炎并接受VAC治疗(n = 89)或开放填塞治疗(n = 24)的患者进行了回顾性分析。分析了患者特征、危险因素和与手术相关的变量。在入院时以及住院期间定期测定C反应蛋白和白细胞计数。我们比较了治疗时间、治疗失败情况、住院时间和死亡率。我们还分析了预测死亡的危险因素。VAC组的院内死亡率为12.4%,而传统组为41.7%(P = 0.0032)。VAC治疗的重症监护住院时间为6.8±14.4天,而开放填塞为18.5±21.0天(P = 0.0081)。死亡的显著危险因素是术前肾衰竭和肥胖。我们的研究结果表明,VAC治疗优于开放填塞,可缩短重症监护住院时间并提高生存率。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
In search of a standardized treatment for poststernotomy mediastinitis.寻找胸骨切开术后纵隔炎的标准化治疗方法。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Feb;59(1):15-20. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1250335. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
5
Risk factors for 1-year mortality after postoperative mediastinitis.术后纵隔炎后1年死亡率的危险因素。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Sep;132(3):537-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.04.037.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验