McCombs J S, Kasper J D, Riley G F
School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90033.
Health Serv Res. 1990 Oct;25(4):593-613.
Charge data from two Medicare HMO demonstration projects were analyzed to determine if prepaid plans achieved cost savings for enrolled beneficiaries. Fallon Community Health Plan of Massachusetts did not reduce total charges significantly for survivors in their first year postenrollment. However, the plan enjoyed reductions in total charges per month after the first year of nearly 38 percent (41 percent for Part A; 31 percent for Part B). Savings for decedents were more modest, reducing total charges per month by around 27 percent (19 percent, Part A; 68 percent, Part B). Greater Marshfield Community Health Plan of Wisconsin was not successful in controlling charges during the demonstration period. Marshfield incurred losses in the first postenrollment year for survivors due to a 38 percent increase in total charges per month (18 percent, Part A; 73 percent, Part B). In the second year postenrollment, the Marshfield plan was able to reduce losses for survivors to roughly 11 percent (-6 percent, Part A; 44 percent, Part B). For decedents, Marshfield experienced an increase in total charges per month of approximately 21 percent relative to fee-for-service comparisons, with Part B charges again much higher than those of the comparison group (47 percent).
对来自两个医疗保险健康维护组织示范项目的费用数据进行了分析,以确定预付计划是否为参保受益人节省了成本。马萨诸塞州的法伦社区健康计划在参保后第一年并未显著降低幸存者的总费用。然而,该计划在第一年之后每月总费用降低了近38%(A部分降低41%;B部分降低31%)。死者的费用节省较为有限,每月总费用降低了约27%(A部分降低19%;B部分降低68%)。威斯康星州的大沼泽地社区健康计划在示范期间未能成功控制费用。由于每月总费用增加38%(A部分增加18%;B部分增加73%),大沼泽地在参保后的第一年,幸存者出现了亏损。在参保后的第二年,大沼泽地计划能够将幸存者的亏损降至约11%(A部分为-6%;B部分为44%)。对于死者,与按服务收费的比较相比,大沼泽地每月总费用增加了约21%,B部分费用再次远高于比较组(47%)。