Esa K, Azarinah I, Muhammad M, Helmi M A, Jaafar M Z
Department of Anaesthesiology & Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (UKMMC), Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, 56000 Cheras, Kuala Lumpur.
Med J Malaysia. 2011 Aug;66(3):182-6.
This was a prospective randomized study comparing the ease of insertion, haemodynamic changes, quality of airway seal, oxygenation and ventilation parameters and complications between Laryngeal Tube Suction II (LTS II) with Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway (PLMA), both are supraglottic airway incorporated with gastric passage. Fifty-four ASA I and II patients were randomly allocated to receive either LTS II or PLMA. Both devices provided a secure airway even under conditions of elevated intra-abdominal pressure up to 17 mmHg. In this study, there were no differences concerning ease of insertion, haemodynamic changes, quality of airway seal, oxygenation and ventilation parameters and complications between LTS II and PLMA.
这是一项前瞻性随机研究，比较了带有胃管通道的喉罩通气道二代（LTS II）与双管喉罩通气道（PLMA）在插入的难易程度、血流动力学变化、气道密封质量、氧合和通气参数以及并发症方面的差异。54例美国麻醉医师协会（ASA）分级为I级和II级的患者被随机分配接受LTS II或PLMA。即使在腹腔内压力升高至17 mmHg的情况下，两种装置均能提供安全的气道。在本研究中，LTS II和PLMA在插入的难易程度、血流动力学变化、气道密封质量、氧合和通气参数以及并发症方面没有差异。
