• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对接受冠状动脉介入治疗的不稳定型心绞痛和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的危险因素及临床结局预测因素的队列研究。

A cohort study of risk factors and clinical outcome predictors for patients presenting with unstable angina and non ST segment elevation myorardial infraction undergoing coronary intervention.

作者信息

Chong E, Shen L, Tan H C, Poh K K

机构信息

Cardiology Department, Jurong Health, Alexandra Hospital and National University Hospital, 378 Alexandra Road, Singapore 159964.

出版信息

Med J Malaysia. 2011 Aug;66(3):249-52.

PMID:22111450
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score has been used to predict outcomes in patients presenting with unstable angina (UA) and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Our study assessed other clinical predictors for patients with UA/NSTEMI undergoing early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cohort of 3822 patients presented with UA/NSTEMI from June 2001 to March 2008 in our center were recruited. Patients underwent PCI during admission. We analyzed the potential risk predictors for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and death at 1 month and 6 month.

RESULTS

Median age was 57.1 +/- 11.1, 78.1 percent men, 34.5 percent had diabetes, 58.8 percent had hypertension. Coronary lesions involving left main and proximal left anterior descending artery was 27.6 percent. 36.1 percent had NSTEMI. Significant predictors for mortality at 6 months were age older than 70 years (p = 0.001, OR = 5.5), female gender (p = 0.001, OR = 2.98), anaemia (p < 0.001 OR = 8.47), baseline renal impairment (P < 0.001, OR = 7.38) and development of contrast nephropathy (CIN) which was defined as 25% or 0.5 mg/dl increase from baseline Creatinine within 48 h after PCI (p = 0.005, OR = 5.8). Diabetes was a predictor of MACE at 6 months (p = 0.003, OR = 1.51) but not mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with UA/NSTEMI, our study showed that MACE and mortality were increased in elderly, female and presence of anaemia. Mortality, but not MACE was increased in chronic renal impairment and development of CIN; while diabetes increased only MACE, but not mortality.

SUMMARY

We analyzed a cohort of 3822 patients with UA/NSTEMI underwent PCI and found that elderly, female, presence of anemia, diabetes and chronic renal impairment were high risk predictors for adverse clinical outcome. In addition, development of CIN increased mortality.

摘要

引言

心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)评分已被用于预测不稳定型心绞痛(UA)和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)患者的预后。我们的研究评估了接受早期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的UA/NSTEMI患者的其他临床预测因素。

材料与方法

招募了2001年6月至2008年3月在我们中心就诊的3822例UA/NSTEMI患者。患者在入院期间接受了PCI。我们分析了1个月和6个月时主要不良心脏事件(MACE)和死亡的潜在风险预测因素。

结果

中位年龄为57.1±11.1岁,男性占78.1%,34.5%患有糖尿病,58.8%患有高血压。累及左主干和左前降支近端的冠状动脉病变占27.6%。36.1%为NSTEMI。6个月时死亡的显著预测因素为年龄大于70岁(p = 0.001,OR = 5.5)、女性(p = 0.001,OR = 2.98)、贫血(p < 0.001,OR = 8.47)、基线肾功能损害(P < 0.001,OR = 7.38)以及造影剂肾病(CIN)的发生,CIN定义为PCI后48小时内肌酐较基线升高25%或0.5mg/dl(p = 0.005,OR = 5.8)。糖尿病是6个月时MACE的预测因素(p = 0.003,OR = 1.51),但不是死亡的预测因素。

结论

在UA/NSTEMI患者中,我们的研究表明,老年人、女性和贫血患者的MACE和死亡率增加。慢性肾功能损害和CIN的发生会增加死亡率,但不会增加MACE;而糖尿病仅增加MACE,不增加死亡率。

总结

我们分析了3822例接受PCI的UA/NSTEMI患者队列,发现老年人、女性、贫血、糖尿病和慢性肾功能损害是不良临床结局的高风险预测因素。此外,CIN的发生会增加死亡率。

相似文献

1
A cohort study of risk factors and clinical outcome predictors for patients presenting with unstable angina and non ST segment elevation myorardial infraction undergoing coronary intervention.一项针对接受冠状动脉介入治疗的不稳定型心绞痛和非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的危险因素及临床结局预测因素的队列研究。
Med J Malaysia. 2011 Aug;66(3):249-52.
2
Comparison of long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients treated for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus those with unstable and stable angina pectoris.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者与不稳定型和稳定型心绞痛患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的长期死亡率比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Aug 1;104(3):333-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.03.052. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
3
Fractional flow reserve in unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction experience from the FAME (Fractional flow reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.不稳定型心绞痛和非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中从 FAME(血流储备分数与血管造影多血管评估)研究中获得的经验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Nov;4(11):1183-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.08.008.
4
Improved in-hospital outcomes in acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina/non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction) despite similar TIMI risk scores.尽管急性冠状动脉综合征(不稳定型心绞痛/非ST段抬高型心肌梗死)患者的心肌梗死溶栓治疗(TIMI)风险评分相似,但住院结局仍有所改善。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2003 Sep;15(9):502-6.
5
Early cardiac catheterization is associated with lower mortality only among high-risk patients with ST- and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: observations from the OPUS-TIMI 16 trial.早期心脏导管插入术仅在伴有ST段和非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征的高危患者中与较低死亡率相关:来自OPUS-TIMI 16试验的观察结果
Am Heart J. 2005 Feb;149(2):275-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.05.055.
6
Outcome in high risk patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.高危无保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jan 1;75(1):101-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22205.
7
[Prognosis after acute coronary syndrome. Lack of difference according to the sex].[急性冠状动脉综合征后的预后。按性别无差异]
Bull Acad Natl Med. 2004;188(3):383-97; discussion 397-9.
8
Comparison of long-term mortality across the spectrum of acute coronary syndromes.急性冠状动脉综合征各类型的长期死亡率比较。
Am Heart J. 2006 May;151(5):1065-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.05.019.
9
Comparison of outcomes of patients ≥ 80 years of age having percutaneous coronary intervention according to presentation (stable vs unstable angina pectoris/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction vs ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction).比较按临床表现(稳定型 vs 不稳定型心绞痛/非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死 vs ST 段抬高型心肌梗死)进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的≥80 岁患者的结局。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Nov 15;108(10):1395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.06.062. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
10
Left circumflex artery-related myocardial infarction: does ST elevation matter? Results from the Euro Heart Survey PCI registry.左旋支动脉相关心肌梗死:ST 段抬高是否重要?来自 Euro Heart Survey PCI 注册研究的结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 15;168(6):5239-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.08.024. Epub 2013 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Contrast-induced acute kidney injury and adverse clinical outcomes risk in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis.对比剂诱导的急性肾损伤与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者不良临床结局风险:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Nephrol. 2018 Dec 22;19(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-1161-5.
2
Clinical characteristics, management and 1-year outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome in Iran: the Iranian Project for Assessment of Coronary Events 2 (IPACE2).伊朗急性冠状动脉综合征患者的临床特征、管理及1年预后:伊朗冠状动脉事件评估项目2(IPACE2)
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 15;5(12):e007786. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007786.