• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高危无保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果。

Outcome in high risk patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jan 1;75(1):101-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22205.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.22205
PMID:19670299
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We examined mortality, risk of myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR) in high-risk patients with unprotected left main (LM) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Western Denmark.

BACKGROUND

PCI of left main coronary artery lesions may be an alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting in high-risk surgical patients.

METHODS

From January 2005 to May 2007, all patients who had unprotected LM PCI with stent implantation were identified in the Western Denmark Heart Registry. The indications for PCI were: (1) ST segment elevation MI (STEMI), (2) non-STEMI (NSTEMI) or unstable angina, and (3) stable angina. All patients were followed up for 18 months.

RESULTS

A total of 344 patients were treated with LM PCI (STEMI: 71, NSTEMI/unstable angina: 157, and stable angina: 116). In STEMI patients, the median logistic EuroSCORE was 22.5 (interquartile range 12.5-39.5), in non-STEMI (NSTEMI)/unstable angina patients 13.8 (4.8-23.9), and in stable angina patients 4.8 (2.2-10.4). Mortality after 18 months 38.0, 18.5, and 11.2% (P < 0.001) in patients with STEMI, NSTEMI/unstable angina, and stable angina, respectively. MI after 18 months was 9.9, 6.4, and 6.0% (P = ns), respectively. Four subacute and one late definite stent thrombosis were seen. TLR occurred in 5.6, 4.5, and 6.9% (P = ns) of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

After PCI, patients with STEMI and LM culprit lesion have a high-mortality risk, whereas long-term outcome for patients with NSTEMI and stable angina pectoris is comparable with other high surgical risk patients with unprotected left main lesion. Further, TLR rates and risk of stent thrombosis were low.

摘要

目的

我们研究了丹麦西部高危无保护左主干(LM)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者的死亡率、心肌梗死(MI)风险和靶病变血运重建(TLR)。

背景

左主干冠状动脉病变的 PCI 可能是高危手术患者冠状动脉旁路移植术的替代方法。

方法

2005 年 1 月至 2007 年 5 月,在丹麦西部心脏注册中心确定了所有接受无保护 LM PCI 加支架植入的患者。PCI 的适应证为:(1)ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI);(2)非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)或不稳定型心绞痛;(3)稳定型心绞痛。所有患者均随访 18 个月。

结果

共 344 例患者接受 LM PCI 治疗(STEMI:71 例,NSTEMI/不稳定型心绞痛:157 例,稳定型心绞痛:116 例)。STEMI 患者的中位数 logistic EuroSCORE 为 22.5(四分位间距 12.5-39.5),NSTEMI/不稳定型心绞痛患者为 13.8(4.8-23.9),稳定型心绞痛患者为 4.8(2.2-10.4)。18 个月后死亡率分别为 STEMI、NSTEMI/不稳定型心绞痛和稳定型心绞痛患者的 38.0%、18.5%和 11.2%(P<0.001)。18 个月后 MI 分别为 9.9%、6.4%和 6.0%(P=ns)。有 4 例亚急性和 1 例晚期明确支架血栓形成。TLR 分别发生在 5.6%、4.5%和 6.9%(P=ns)的患者中。

结论

PCI 后,STEMI 患者和 LM 罪犯病变死亡率高,而 NSTEMI 患者和稳定型心绞痛患者的长期预后与其他高危、无保护左主干病变患者相似。此外,TLR 发生率和支架血栓形成风险较低。

相似文献

1
Outcome in high risk patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.高危无保护左主干冠状动脉狭窄患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jan 1;75(1):101-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22205.
2
Clinical outcomes after PCI for acute coronary syndrome in unprotected left main coronary artery disease: insights from the Swiss Acute Left Main Coronary Vessel Percutaneous Management (SALVage) study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病急性冠状动脉综合征的临床结局:来自瑞士急性左主干冠状动脉血管经皮管理(SALVage)研究的结果。
EuroIntervention. 2011 Oct 30;7(6):697-704. doi: 10.4244/EIJV7I6A112.
3
Comparison of long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients treated for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction versus those with unstable and stable angina pectoris.急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者与不稳定型和稳定型心绞痛患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的长期死亡率比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2009 Aug 1;104(3):333-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.03.052. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
4
Impact of diabetes mellitus on patients with unprotected left main coronary artery lesion disease treated with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary-artery bypass grafting.糖尿病对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术的无保护左主干冠状动脉病变患者的影响。
Coron Artery Dis. 2012 Aug;23(5):322-9. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283564961.
5
Comparison of outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention among different coronary subsets (stable and unstable angina pectoris and ST-segment and non-ST-segment myocardial infarction).比较不同冠状动脉亚组(稳定性和不稳定性心绞痛以及 ST 段和非 ST 段心肌梗死)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的结局。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jun 1;113(11):1794-801. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.03.007. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
6
Six-month clinical follow-up of the Tryton side branch stent for the treatment of bifurcation lesions: a two center registry analysis.Tryton 分支支架治疗分叉病变的 6 个月临床随访:一项两中心注册研究分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 May 1;77(6):798-806. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22767. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
7
Incidence of definite stent thrombosis or in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation for treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis: from Western Denmark Heart Registry.药物洗脱支架置入治疗冠状动脉支架内再狭窄后明确的支架血栓形成或支架内再狭窄发生率:来自丹麦西部心脏注册研究。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb;81(2):260-5. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24398. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
8
Retrospective multicenter observational study of the interventional management of coronary disease in the very elderly: the NINETY.回顾性多中心观察研究:高龄患者的冠状动脉疾病介入治疗:NINETY。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Sep 1;82(3):414-21. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24406. Epub 2013 Jun 3.
9
Long-term follow-up after percutaneous treatment of the unprotected left main stenosis in high risk patients not suitable for bypass surgery.经皮治疗不适合搭桥手术的高危患者无保护左主干狭窄后的长期随访。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2012 Jun;65(6):530-7. doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2011.12.020. Epub 2012 Apr 21.
10
Comparison of outcomes of patients ≥ 80 years of age having percutaneous coronary intervention according to presentation (stable vs unstable angina pectoris/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction vs ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction).比较按临床表现(稳定型 vs 不稳定型心绞痛/非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死 vs ST 段抬高型心肌梗死)进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的≥80 岁患者的结局。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Nov 15;108(10):1395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.06.062. Epub 2011 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug-coated balloon-only strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention of de novo left main coronary artery disease: the importance of proper lesion preparation.单纯药物涂层球囊策略用于初发左主干冠状动脉疾病的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:合适病变预处理的重要性
Front Med. 2023 Feb;17(1):75-84. doi: 10.1007/s11684-022-0950-1. Epub 2022 Dec 23.
2
Cardiogenic shock due to left main related myocardial infarction: is revascularization enough?左主干相关心肌梗死所致心源性休克:血运重建是否足够?
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2022 Feb 28;19(2):152-157. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2022.02.005.
3
A study of unprotected left main intervention in the ACS population 2013-2018.
2013 年至 2018 年 ACS 人群中未经保护的左主干介入治疗的研究。
Indian Heart J. 2021 Jul-Aug;73(4):492-496. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2021.06.010. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
4
Temporal Trends and Site Variation in High-Risk Coronary Intervention and the Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support: Insights From the Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking (CART) Program.高危冠状动脉介入治疗和机械循环支持的时间趋势和部位差异:来自退伍军人事务临床评估报告和跟踪(CART)计划的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Dec 17;8(24):e014906. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014906. Epub 2019 Dec 7.
5
Therapeutic effect of interventional therapy for unprotected left main coronary artery lesions in aged patients.老年患者无保护左主干冠状动脉病变的介入治疗效果
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2015 Nov;12(6):634-40. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2015.06.005.
6
High-risk diabetic patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: characteristics and medium-term outcomes of percutaneous revascularization with drug-eluting stents.患有无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病的高危糖尿病患者:药物洗脱支架经皮血运重建的特征及中期结果
Tex Heart Inst J. 2011;38(4):386-91.
7
Existing data sources for clinical epidemiology: The Western Denmark Heart Registry.临床流行病学的现有数据源:丹麦西部心脏注册研究。
Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Aug 9;2:137-44. doi: 10.2147/clep.s10190.