Terrence Donnelly Heart Centre, Division of Cardiology, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Can J Cardiol. 2012 Jan-Feb;28(1):48-53. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2011.09.003. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
The role of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA [aspirin]) and warfarin in secondary prevention after acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is well established. However, there are sparse data comparing the presentation and outcomes of patients who present with ACS while on ASA and/or warfarin therapy and those on neither.
Using data from the Canadian Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE), we stratified 14,090 ACS patients into 4 groups according to prior use of antithrombotic therapies and compared in-hospital management and outcomes.
Among 14,090 ACS patients, 7411 (52.6%) were not on prior ASA or warfarin therapy, 5724 (40.6%) were on ASA only, 593 (4.2%) were on warfarin only, and 362 (2.6%) were on both ASA and warfarin. ACS patients taking ASA and/or warfarin were older with more comorbidities than the patients on neither drug. Patients receiving prior warfarin only or ASA and warfarin were less likely to receive guideline-recommended therapies. Patients who were taking prior warfarin only had higher unadjusted rates of death, death and/or reinfarction (re-MI), congestive heart failure (CHF), and major bleeding as compared with patients on no prior therapy. Furthermore, patients who were taking ASA and warfarin had higher unadjusted rates of death and/or re-MI and CHF than patients on prior ASA only.
ACS patients on prior warfarin are a high-risk population, yet they receive less guideline-recommended therapies and have higher unadjusted adverse event rates during their index hospitalization. With the increasing use of oral anticoagulants, clinical trials are needed to guide the optimal management of these ACS patients.
乙酰水杨酸(ASA[阿司匹林])和华法林在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)后的二级预防中的作用已得到充分证实。然而,关于正在接受 ASA 和/或华法林治疗的 ACS 患者与未接受这两种药物治疗的 ACS 患者的临床表现和结局比较的数据很少。
利用来自加拿大急性冠状动脉事件全球注册(GRACE)的数据,我们根据先前使用抗血栓治疗情况将 14090 例 ACS 患者分为 4 组,并比较了住院期间的管理和结局。
在 14090 例 ACS 患者中,7411 例(52.6%)未服用先前的 ASA 或华法林,5724 例(40.6%)仅服用 ASA,593 例(4.2%)仅服用华法林,362 例(2.6%)同时服用 ASA 和华法林。正在服用 ASA 和/或华法林的 ACS 患者比未服用这两种药物的患者年龄更大,合并症更多。接受过单独华法林治疗或 ASA 和华法林治疗的患者不太可能接受指南推荐的治疗。与未接受任何先前治疗的患者相比,仅接受过单独华法林治疗的患者的死亡、死亡和/或再梗死(再 MI)、充血性心力衰竭(CHF)和大出血的未调整发生率更高。此外,与仅接受过 ASA 治疗的患者相比,同时服用 ASA 和华法林的患者的死亡和/或再 MI 和 CHF 的未调整发生率更高。
正在服用华法林的 ACS 患者是高危人群,但他们在住院期间接受的指南推荐治疗更少,且未调整的不良事件发生率更高。随着口服抗凝剂的应用日益增多,需要开展临床试验来指导这些 ACS 患者的最佳治疗。