London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Health Economics and Systems Analysis Group, United Kingdom.
J Health Econ. 2012 Jan;31(1):271-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2011.10.010. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
Financial incentives are increasingly being advocated as an effective means to influence health-related behaviours. There is, however, limited evidence on whether they work in low-income countries, particularly when implemented at scale. This paper explores the impact of a national programme in Nepal that provides cash incentives to women conditional on them giving birth in a health facility. Using propensity score matching methods, we find that the programme had a positive, albeit modest, effect on the utilisation of maternity services. Women who had heard of the SDIP before childbirth were 4.2 percentage points (17 percent) more likely to deliver with a skilled attendant. The treatment effect is positively associated with the size of the financial package offered by the programme and the quality of care in facilities. Despite the positive effect on those exposed to the SDIP, low coverage of the programme suggests that few women actually benefited in the first few years.
财政激励措施作为影响健康相关行为的有效手段,越来越受到提倡。然而,关于它们在低收入国家是否有效的证据有限,尤其是在大规模实施时。本文探讨了尼泊尔的一项国家计划的影响,该计划向在卫生机构分娩的妇女提供现金奖励。利用倾向评分匹配方法,我们发现该计划对产妇服务的利用产生了积极的、但适度的影响。在分娩前听说过 SDIP 的妇女中,有熟练助产士接生的可能性高 4.2 个百分点(17%)。治疗效果与计划提供的财政一揽子计划的规模以及设施中的护理质量呈正相关。尽管 SDIP 对那些接触到该计划的人有积极影响,但该计划的低覆盖率表明,在最初的几年里,实际上只有少数妇女受益。